open access

Vol 13, No 3 (2007)
Research paper
Published online: 2007-07-04
Get Citation

Large vessel injuries - own experience

Mirosław Dziekiewicz, Andrzej Obara, Marek Maruszyński, Marek Najdecki, Krzysztof Paśnik, Tadeusz Przystasz
Acta Angiologica 2007;13(3):95-103.

open access

Vol 13, No 3 (2007)
Original papers
Published online: 2007-07-04

Abstract


Background. The aim of the authors was to present the characteristics of large vessel injuries in patients wounded during 1966-2004 and their management in the Department of General, Oncological and Vascular Surgery and Department of General, Oncological and Thoracic Surgery of the Military Institute of Health Service in Warsaw.
Material and methods. Retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of 249 patients treated for large vessel injuries e.g. vessels of the neck, chest, abdomen and extremities. According to the type of injury and vessel localization, different types of reconstruction were performed. All possible methods of vessel reconstruction were done.
Results. A total of 249 patients presenting large vessel injuries were recorded. 59% (115/193) presented femoral artery injuries, 24% (47/193) - popliteal artery injuries, 10% (20/193) - brachial artery injuries, 1% (2/193) - common carotid artery injuries, 1% (2/193) - aorta injuries, 1% (2/193) pulmonary artery injuries and 0.5% (1/193) mesenteric artery injuries. Then 32% (25/76) of inferior vein cava injuries, 21% (16/76) - popliteal vein, 11% (9/76) - femoral vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - brachial vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - subclavian vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - axillary vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - renal vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - iliac vein injuries, 2.5% (2/76) - jugular vein injuries, 2.5% (2/76) - pulmonary vein injuries and 2.5% (2/76) - transverse vein of neck were treated. The time from injury and hospital admittance ranged from 40 minutes up to 87 hours. In 4 cases, facing evident peripheral necrotic lesions of the leg, amputation was performed.
Conclusions. These injuries require prompt treatment to save life. The wounds have to be treated individually. Early and adequate primary treatment, combined with early reparation and reconstruction of vessel wall, establishment of circulation and closure of soft tissue defects gives the best functional and aesthetic results, decreased mortality, morbidity and cost of treatment.

Abstract


Background. The aim of the authors was to present the characteristics of large vessel injuries in patients wounded during 1966-2004 and their management in the Department of General, Oncological and Vascular Surgery and Department of General, Oncological and Thoracic Surgery of the Military Institute of Health Service in Warsaw.
Material and methods. Retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of 249 patients treated for large vessel injuries e.g. vessels of the neck, chest, abdomen and extremities. According to the type of injury and vessel localization, different types of reconstruction were performed. All possible methods of vessel reconstruction were done.
Results. A total of 249 patients presenting large vessel injuries were recorded. 59% (115/193) presented femoral artery injuries, 24% (47/193) - popliteal artery injuries, 10% (20/193) - brachial artery injuries, 1% (2/193) - common carotid artery injuries, 1% (2/193) - aorta injuries, 1% (2/193) pulmonary artery injuries and 0.5% (1/193) mesenteric artery injuries. Then 32% (25/76) of inferior vein cava injuries, 21% (16/76) - popliteal vein, 11% (9/76) - femoral vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - brachial vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - subclavian vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - axillary vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - renal vein injuries, 5% (4/76) - iliac vein injuries, 2.5% (2/76) - jugular vein injuries, 2.5% (2/76) - pulmonary vein injuries and 2.5% (2/76) - transverse vein of neck were treated. The time from injury and hospital admittance ranged from 40 minutes up to 87 hours. In 4 cases, facing evident peripheral necrotic lesions of the leg, amputation was performed.
Conclusions. These injuries require prompt treatment to save life. The wounds have to be treated individually. Early and adequate primary treatment, combined with early reparation and reconstruction of vessel wall, establishment of circulation and closure of soft tissue defects gives the best functional and aesthetic results, decreased mortality, morbidity and cost of treatment.
Get Citation

Keywords

gunshot wounds; penetrating injuries; surgery

About this article
Title

Large vessel injuries - own experience

Journal

Acta Angiologica

Issue

Vol 13, No 3 (2007)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

95-103

Published online

2007-07-04

Page views

1133

Article views/downloads

1504

Bibliographic record

Acta Angiologica 2007;13(3):95-103.

Keywords

gunshot wounds
penetrating injuries
surgery

Authors

Mirosław Dziekiewicz
Andrzej Obara
Marek Maruszyński
Marek Najdecki
Krzysztof Paśnik
Tadeusz Przystasz

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl