open access

Vol 18, No 1 (2012)
Original papers
Published online: 2012-04-03
Get Citation

Preliminary results from the first Polish screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province

Arkadiusz Jawień, Bartosz Fórmankiewicz, Tadeusz Dereziński, Paweł Brazis, Arkadiusz Migdalski, Radosław Piotrowicz, Łukasz Woda, Dariusz M. Górecki
Acta Angiologica 2012;18(1):9-17.

open access

Vol 18, No 1 (2012)
Original papers
Published online: 2012-04-03

Abstract

Background. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is called a widening of the aorta below the renal arteries with a diameter more than 3 cm. The prevalence of AAA is estimated at 4–8% in men aged 65 years or more. The mortality rate for patients with ruptured AAA is 65%, while the mortality rate for aortic aneurysm repair surgery in elective patients undergoing pre-screened is 3%. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of AAA among men aged 60 years and older undergoing targeted ultrasonography of abdominal aorta. The additional aim was to determine the relationship between specific risk factors and the AAA, and to determine the prevalence of AAA in patients subgroups specified by the criteria for the screening programmes for AAA.

Material and methods. Based on available data from the literature, study populations was defined as men aged 60 years and older. Applied research methods were as follow: 1) the questionnaire; 2) measurement of physical characteristics of aorta (diameter of abdominal aorta by ultrasound scan). The questionnaire consisted of two parts: 1) identification and demographic data; 2) the presence of risk factors. Analysis of data from the questionnaire determined the relationship between the risk factors and the AAA, whereas ultrasonography of the aorta, detected the disease (abdominal aortic aneurysm) and its prevelance. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the software STATISTICA 9 (StatSoft, Inc., 2009).

Results. Based on 1556 ultrasound scans, the abdominal aortic aneurysm was diagnosed in 94 men aged 60 years and older. The prevalence of AAA in the study group was 6.0%. Risk factors associated with the AAA were analyzed in two groups: I — AAA (n = 94) and II — normal aorta (n = 1464). The three risk factors were significantly associated with the AAA: age, smoking and family history, whereas the incidence of AAA in males at 65 years old was 4.0%, and a group of men between 65 and 75 years of age, smoking cigarettes ever, was 7.4%.

Conclusions. In the obtained data the prevalence of AAA was similar to that of literature. Additionally, the positive relationship between age, smoking, and AAA was detected.

Acta Angiol 2012; 18, 1: 9–17

Abstract

Background. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is called a widening of the aorta below the renal arteries with a diameter more than 3 cm. The prevalence of AAA is estimated at 4–8% in men aged 65 years or more. The mortality rate for patients with ruptured AAA is 65%, while the mortality rate for aortic aneurysm repair surgery in elective patients undergoing pre-screened is 3%. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of AAA among men aged 60 years and older undergoing targeted ultrasonography of abdominal aorta. The additional aim was to determine the relationship between specific risk factors and the AAA, and to determine the prevalence of AAA in patients subgroups specified by the criteria for the screening programmes for AAA.

Material and methods. Based on available data from the literature, study populations was defined as men aged 60 years and older. Applied research methods were as follow: 1) the questionnaire; 2) measurement of physical characteristics of aorta (diameter of abdominal aorta by ultrasound scan). The questionnaire consisted of two parts: 1) identification and demographic data; 2) the presence of risk factors. Analysis of data from the questionnaire determined the relationship between the risk factors and the AAA, whereas ultrasonography of the aorta, detected the disease (abdominal aortic aneurysm) and its prevelance. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the software STATISTICA 9 (StatSoft, Inc., 2009).

Results. Based on 1556 ultrasound scans, the abdominal aortic aneurysm was diagnosed in 94 men aged 60 years and older. The prevalence of AAA in the study group was 6.0%. Risk factors associated with the AAA were analyzed in two groups: I — AAA (n = 94) and II — normal aorta (n = 1464). The three risk factors were significantly associated with the AAA: age, smoking and family history, whereas the incidence of AAA in males at 65 years old was 4.0%, and a group of men between 65 and 75 years of age, smoking cigarettes ever, was 7.4%.

Conclusions. In the obtained data the prevalence of AAA was similar to that of literature. Additionally, the positive relationship between age, smoking, and AAA was detected.

Acta Angiol 2012; 18, 1: 9–17
Get Citation

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm; ultrasonography; screening

About this article
Title

Preliminary results from the first Polish screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province

Journal

Acta Angiologica

Issue

Vol 18, No 1 (2012)

Pages

9-17

Published online

2012-04-03

Bibliographic record

Acta Angiologica 2012;18(1):9-17.

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm
ultrasonography
screening

Authors

Arkadiusz Jawień
Bartosz Fórmankiewicz
Tadeusz Dereziński
Paweł Brazis
Arkadiusz Migdalski
Radosław Piotrowicz
Łukasz Woda
Dariusz M. Górecki

References (37)
  1. Perrin MR, Guex JJ, Ruckley CV, et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 8(4): 233–245.
  2. Hach W, Dieter J, Hach Wunderle V, et al. Chirurgia żył. Podręcznik dla chirurgów ogólnych, chirurgów naczyniowych, dermatologów i flebologów i angiologów. 2007: 141.
  3. Ramelet AA, Monti M. Flebologia. Przewodnik. Dupleksowa ocena sposobu zaopatrzenia ujść odpiszczelowo-udowych i odpiszczelowo-podkolanowych u pacjentów z żylakami nawrotowymi 2003: 333–337.
  4. Pawlaczyk K, Zieliński P, Krasiński Z, et al. Dupleksowa ocena sposobu zaopatrzenia ujść odpiszczelowo-udowych i odpiszczelowo-podkolanowych u pacjentów z żylakami nawrotowymi. Acta Angiol. 2010; 16: 114–112.
  5. Perrin MR, Guex JJ, Ruckley CV, et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 8(4): 233–245.
  6. Wong JKF, Duncan JL, Nichols DM. Whole-leg duplex mapping for varicose veins: observations on patterns of reflux in recurrent and primary legs, with clinical correlation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 25(3): 267–275.
  7. Sieroń A, Cierpki L, Rybak Z, Stanek A. Podręcznik angiologii. Alfa Medica Press, Bielsko-Biała 2009: 246–264.
  8. Hawro P, Krawczyk-Kropka A, Lekston A, et al. Zmienność ujścia żyły odstrzałkowej. Przegląd Flebologiczny. 2006; 14.
  9. Kawecki P. Ultrasonografia żył kończyn dolnych. Medipage, Warszawa 2013: 14–74.
  10. Duplex Ultrasound Investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. UIP Consensus Document. Part II. Anatomy 2013.
  11. Hawro P, Krawczyk-Kropka A, Lekston A, et al. Poglądy na anatomię i mianownictwo żyły odpiszczelowej oraz jej dopływów. Przegląd Flebologiczny. 2006; 14.
  12. Cagiatti A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P, et al. Nomenclature of the venis of the lower limbs; an international inerdyscyplinary consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 416–422.
  13. Blanchemaison P, Camponovo J, Greney P. Atlas anatomiczny żył powierzchownych kończyn dolnych część 1. Servier Polska, Warszawa 2003: 32–35.
  14. Kosiński K. Kilka uwag o powierzchownym układzie żylnym kończyny dolnej. PZWL, Warszawa 1986: 16–26.
  15. Hach W, Dieter J, Hach Wunderle V, Junger M. Hach Wunderle V., Junger M. Chirurgia żył. W: (red.). Podręcznik dla chirurgów ogólnych, chirurgów naczyniowych, dermatologów i flebologów i angiologów. Galaktyka 2009: 88–172.
  16. Hanrahan LM, Araki CT, Rodriguez AA, et al. Distribution of valvular incompetence in patients with venous stasis ulceration. J Vasc Surg. 1991; 13(6): 805–11; discussion 811.
  17. Ioannou CV, Giannoukas AD, Kostas T, et al. Patterns of venous reflux in limbs with venous ulcers. Implications for treatment. Int Angiol. 2003; 22(2): 182–187.
  18. Kostas T, Ioannou CV, Touloupakis E, et al. Recurrent varicose veins after surgery: a new appraisal of a common and complex problem in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 27(3): 275–282.
  19. Quigley FG, Raptis S, Cashman M. Duplex ultrasonography of recurrent varicose veins. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994; 2(6): 775–777.
  20. Dzieciuchowicz L, Espinosa G, Páramo JA. Haemostatic activation and inflammatory response after three methods of treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. 2014; 29(3): 154–163.
  21. Perrin MR, Guex JJ, Ruckley CV, et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 8(4): 233–245.
  22. Galanopoulos G, Lambidis C. Minimally invasive treatment of varicose veins: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Int J Surg. 2012; 10(3): 134–139.
  23. van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, et al. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49(1): 230–239.
  24. Luebke T, Gawenda M, Heckenkamp J, et al. Meta-Analysis of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration of the Great Saphenous Vein in Primary Varicosis. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2008; 15(2): 213–223.
  25. Siribumrungwong B, Noorit P, Wilasrusmee C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 44(2): 214–223.
  26. van Ruijven PWM, van den Bos RR, Alazard LM, et al. Temperature measurements for dose-finding in steam ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(5): 1454–1456.
  27. Rathbun S, Norris A, Morrison N, et al. Efficacy and safety of endovenous foam sclerotherapy: meta-analysis for treatment of venous disorders. Phlebology. 2012; 27(3): 105–117.
  28. Zubilewicz T. Doświadczenia własne w EVLT niewydolnej żyły odstrzałkowej — Katedra i Klinika Chirurgii Naczyń i Angiologii Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lublinie 2012.
  29. Wasilewski K. Leczenie wewnątrzżylne jest współcześnie najlepszą metodą leczenia niewydolności żyły odpiszczelowej. Dubai Care City. 2012.
  30. Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(5 Suppl): 2S–48S.
  31. van den Bos RR, van Ruijven PWM, van der Geld CWM, et al. Endovenous simulated laser experiments at 940 nm and 1470 nm suggest wavelength-independent temperature profiles. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 44(1): 77–81.
  32. Rass K, Frings N, Glowacki P, et al. Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(1): 49–58.
  33. Gloviczki P. Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery: indications and results. Vasc Med. 1999; 4(3): 173–180.
  34. Kostas T, Ioannou CV, Touloupakis E, et al. Recurrent varicose veins after surgery: a new appraisal of a common and complex problem in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 27(3): 275–282.
  35. Pukacki F, Zieliński P, Checiński P, et al. [Short saphenous vein incompetence as a cause of recurrent varicose veins]. Wiad Lek. 2003; 56(1-2): 28–33.
  36. Zubilewicz T, Terlecki P. Jak sobie radzić z chorobami żył? Via Medica, Gdańsk 2011.
  37. Labropoulos N, Touloupakis E, Giannoukas AD, et al. Recurrent varicose veins: investigation of the pattern and extent of reflux with color flow duplex scanning. Surgery. 1996; 119(4): 406–409.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl