Vol 16, No 1 (2011)
Published online: 2011-01-01

open access

Page views 144
Article views/downloads 171
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Monte Carlo dose calculation of GZP6 Co stepping source based on a matrix shift technique

Mohammad Taghi Toossi1, Malihe Abdollahi, Mahdi Ghorbani1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.11.005
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2011;16(1):10-13.

Abstract

Background

As a routine method for stepping source simulation, a Monte Carlo program is run according to the number of steps and then the summation of dose from each run is taken to obtain total dose distribution. This method is time consuming.

Aim

As an alternative method, a matrix shift based technique was applied to simulate a stepping source for brachytherapy.

Materials and methods

The stepping source of GZP6 brachytherapy unit was simulated. In a matrix shift method, it is assumed that a radiation source is stationary and instead the data matrix is shifted based on the number of steps. In this study, by running MCNPX program for one point and calculation of the dose matrix using the matrix shift method, the isodose curves for the esophageal cancer tumor lengths of 4 and 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm were obtained and compared with the isodose curves obtained by running MCNPX programs in each step position separately (15 and 23 steps for esophageal cancer tumor lengths of 4 and 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm, respectively).

Results

The difference between the two dose matrixes for the stepping and matrix shift methods based on the average dose differences are 3.85[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10−4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy and 5.19[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10−4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy for treatment length of 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm and 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm, respectively. Dose differences are insignificant and these two methods are equally valid.

Conclusions

The matrix shift method presented in this study can be used for calculation of dose distribution for a brachytherapy stepping source as a quicker tool compared to other routine Monte Carlo based methods.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy