Vol 15, No 6 (2010)
Published online: 2010-11-01

open access

Page views 183
Article views/downloads 229
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Air kerma strength characterization of a GZP6 Cobalt-60 brachytherapy source

Mohammad Taghi Toossi1, Mahdi Ghorbani1, Ali Asghar Mowlavi2, Mojtaba Taheri3, Mohsen Layegh4, Yasha Makhdoumi3, Ali Soleimani Meigooni5
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.10.002
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010;15(6):190-194.

Abstract

Background

Task group number 40 (TG-40) of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) has recommended calibration of any brachytherapy source before its clinical use. GZP6 afterloading brachytherapy unit is a 60Co high dose rate (HDR) system recently being used in some of the Iranian radiotherapy centers.

Aim

In this study air kerma strength (AKS) of 60Co source number three of this unit was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation and in air measurements.

Materials and methods

Simulation was performed by employing the MCNP-4C Monte Carlo code. Self-absorption of the source core and its capsule were taken into account when calculating air kerma strength. In-air measurements were performed according to the multiple distance method; where a specially designed jig and a 0.6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm3 Farmer type ionization chamber were used for the measurements. Monte Carlo simulation, in air measurement and GZP6 treatment planning results were compared for primary air kerma strength (as for November 8th 2005).

Results

Monte Carlo calculated and in air measured air kerma strength were respectively equal to 17240.01[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]μGym2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]h−1 and 16991.83[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]μGym2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]h−1. The value provided by the GZP6 treatment planning system (TPS) was “15355[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]μGym2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]h−1”.

Conclusion

The calculated and measured AKS values are in good agreement. Calculated-TPS and measured-TPS AKS values are also in agreement within the uncertainties related to our calculation, measurements and those certified by the GZP6 manufacturer. Considering the uncertainties, the TPS value for AKS is validated by our calculations and measurements, however, it is incorporated with a large uncertainty.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy