Vol 19, No 5 (2023)
Review paper
Published online: 2022-10-06

open access

Page views 364
Article views/downloads 393
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Selected neurological complications of oncological treatment — literature overview

Anita Gorzelak-Magiera12, Agnieszka Bobola12, Amanda Robek12, Ewa Krzystanek34, Iwona Gisterek25
Oncol Clin Pract 2023;19(5):346-355.


Treatment in oncology may lead to several adverse side effects, including those affecting the nervous system. These side effects may reduce the quality of life of patients, both during and after treatment, and may necessitate changes in the treatment regimen or reduction of drug doses, thus reducing the effectiveness of therapy. The knowledge of therapy-induced side effects is essential for their early recognition and differentiation from symptoms resulting from the progression of neoplastic disease, metabolic disorders, or infections, requiring prompt initiation of causal treatment. This article presents the current state of knowledge regarding central and peripheral neurotoxicity of treatment in oncology. Adverse effects described after chemo- and radiotherapy are better known but still limit the potential possibilities of the applied treatment. Neurotoxicities of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which are of increasing importance in the era of personalization of treatment, are presented.


Oncology in Clinical Practice

DOI: 10.5603/OCP.2022.0032

Copyright © 2023 Via Medica

ISSN 2450–1654

e-ISSN 2450–6478

Selected neurological complications of oncological treatment literature overview

Anita Gorzelak-Magiera12Agnieszka Bobola12Amanda Robek12Ewa Krzystanek34Iwona Gisterek25
1Department of Clinical Oncology, University Clinical Center in Katowice, Poland
2Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
3Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
4Department of Neurology, Upper Silesia Medical Center in Katowice, Poland
5Department of Radiotherapy, University Clinical Center in Katowice, Poland

Address for correspondence:

Anita Gorzelak-Magiera, MD

Department of Clinical Oncology

University Clinical Center in Katowice

ul. Ceglana 35, 40–514 Katowice, Poland

e-mail: anitagor@op.pl

Received: 29.03.2022 Accepted: 13.06.2022 Early publication date: 06.10.2022


Treatment in oncology may lead to several adverse side effects, including those affecting the nervous system. These side effects may reduce the quality of life of patients, both during and after treatment, and may necessitate changes in the treatment regimen or reduction of drug doses, thus reducing the effectiveness of therapy. The knowledge of therapy-induced side effects is essential for their early recognition and differentiation from symptoms resulting from the progression of neoplastic disease, metabolic disorders, or infections, requiring prompt initiation of causal treatment. This article presents the current state of knowledge regarding central and peripheral neurotoxicity of treatment in oncology. Adverse effects described after chemo- and radiotherapy are better known but still limit the potential possibilities of the applied treatment. Neurotoxicities of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which are of increasing importance in the era of personalization of treatment, are presented.

Keywords: neurotoxicity, chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy, acute polyneuropathy, chemobrain, ototoxicity, plexopathy

Oncol Clin Pract 2023; 19, 5: 347355


Neurotoxicity of systemic treatment in oncology is the second dose-limiting effect of chemotherapy, after myelotoxicity. Toxicity affects both the central and peripheral nervous systems: it can occur already during treatment and many years after its completion. The probability of its occurrence depends on the dose of the drug, the rhythm of treatment, concomitant use of other drugs and neurotoxic substances, comorbidities of the nervous system, and individual predisposition [1, 2]. Non-selective damage of cellular DNA by chemotherapy, excessive response of the immune system against normal cells induced by immunotherapy, and in the case of radiotherapy, direct or indirect damage of nerve cells, endocrine disorders, or fibrosis of neuronal structures contribute to the development of neurotoxicity [2]. In this article, we present a review of neurological complications of treatment applied in oncology concerning the peripheral and central nervous systems.

Adverse side effects of the peripheral nervous system

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common nervous adverse system side effects associated with oncological treatment. It is estimated that this problem affects 3040% of patients undergoing chemotherapy [3]. It is most commonly induced by platinum derivatives, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib, or thalidomide. CIPN can occur after a single dose of a drug or after exceeding a cumulative dose [3, 4]. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy most often appears in the first two months of treatment and increases in the course of its duration [5]. There is a phenomenon of “the coasting effect” of chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy after treatment with platinum derivatives [6, 7]. The predisposing factors of CIPN are older age, pre-existing polyneuropathy, chronic renal failure, current or past smoking, concomitant use of other neurotoxic substances, genetic predisposition [single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a higher risk of CIPN] [4, 5]. CIPN manifests itself in many ways. Nerve fibers with a small cross-sectional area (C fibers) are mainly damaged, resulting in burning pain, hypersensitivity, and then loss of pain and temperature sensation. Initially, the disorder involves fingers and toes, then spreads proximally and involves larger areas of the extremities (the so-called glove and sock symptom). Patients report numbness, tingling, paresthesia, dysesthesia, and sensory disturbances. These symptoms may be accompanied by pain, lack of deep sensation, balance problems, gait impairment, and loss of ability to perform fine movements. The occurrence of peripheral polyneuropathy during chemotherapy often leads to a reduction of drug doses and sometimes to discontinuation of treatment. Both during and after treatment, peripheral polyneuropathy can significantly reduce quality of life (QoL) and have a negative impact on health status, increasing the risk of falls, inducing sleep disturbances, and contributing to psychiatric disorders (Tab. 1) [3, 6, 8]. The only drug whose efficacy in relieving the symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy has been confirmed in phase III clinical trials is duloxetine [9, 10]. Last January the results of a prospective study were published to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in a group of 100 patients who developed peripheral polyneuropathy during cancer treatment. The response to treatment was evaluated using the PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) scale, in which 1 represented no response and 7 represented an excellent response. In this analysis, higher scores, and thus higher treatment efficacy, were obtained in the group of women and those displaying CIPN symptoms for a shorter period. Fifty-seven percent of patients discontinued taking duloxetine early due to adverse effects (37%) and lack of treatment efficacy (20%); men predominated in this subgroup of patients [11].

Table 1. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy of the most commonly used chemotherapeutics: pathomechanism and clinical presentation [4, 6–8]

Drug group

Mechanism of CIPN

CIPN Symptoms


  • cisplatin
  • oxaliplatin
  • carboplatin
  • mitochondrial DNA damage
  • atrophy of dorsal root ganglion cells
  • dysfunction of ion channels
  • impairment of intracellular signaling
  • increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines

Oxaliplatin is a drug that can induce both chronic peripheral and acute neuropathy

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral polyneuropathy is purely sensory with glove and sock distribution and occurs in 5070% of those undergoing treatment

Cisplatin causes chronic polyneuropathy after 12 months in 520% of treated

Neurotoxicity resulting mainly from damage to large-diameter fibers is manifested by disturbances of vibration and position sensation

Carboplatin has the lowest neurotoxicity in this group. Polyneuropathy is experienced by 1342% of those treated


  • paclitaxel
  • docetaxel
  • cabasitaxel
  • nab-paclitaxel
  • influence on pore permeability within mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum
  • increased synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF alpha and IL-1 beta), decreased synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10)
  • altered expression and function of ion channels leading to morphological and biochemical changes in the dorsal roots of spinal nerves
  • direct damage to sensory neurons through degeneration of nerve fibers and their demyelination

Taxanes primarily cause damage to small-diameter fibers manifesting as paresthesias, dysesthesias, or numbness in the stocking-and-glove distribution, loss of proprioception, and impairment of fine motor movements

Motor neuron function and autonomic nervous system function may be impaired

Paclitaxel induces sensory neuropathy of severe severity (G3 and G4) in 2035% of patients receiving 250 mg/m2 of chemotherapeutic agent every 3 weeks, and in 512% of patients treated with < 200 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks

Vinca alkaloids

  • vincristine
  • vinorelbine
  • vindesine
  • vinblastine
  • impaired axonal transport inducing distal axonopathy
  • changes in axons and dorsal root ganglion neurons leading to primary axonal degeneration called Waller’s degeneration
  • changes in the activity of ion channels and hyperactivity of peripheral nervous system neurons
  • increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines

Symptoms of polyneuropathy involve both sensory and autonomic nerves. Patients most commonly report numbness, tingling, and neuropathic pain in the extremities. Distribution of glove- and sock-like symptoms in 3545% of those treated

The substance with the highest neuropathic potential in this group of cytostatics is vincristine. Severe polyradiculopathies resembling Guillain-Barré syndrome have been reported. Autonomic nervous system disorders after the use of vinca alkaloids are manifested by constipation, urinary retention, and sometimes orthostatic hypotension


Treatments used in oncology can induce plexopathy, i.e. damage to nerve plexuses. It mainly affects the brachial and lumbosacral plexuses. Symptoms are muscle weakness, sensory disturbances, and impaired deep reflexes which may be accompanied by pain [2]. The injury of the plexus is mainly induced by radiotherapy to the thoracic region. The symptoms of plexopathy usually appear with a delay, from 6 months to even 30 years after the end of radiotherapy [2, 12]. In differentiating between plexus cancer infiltration and radiation damage, the etiology secondary to treatment is indicated by mild pain, involvement of the upper part of the plexus, and accompanying lymphedema of the limb. Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography may be helpful in the diagnosis. Lumbosacral plexopathy is usually associated with radiotherapy to the pelvic region. The predominant symptoms are paresis of the lower extremities, and, less frequently, sensory disturbances [12]. Symptoms of plexus injury, although much less frequent, may occur after treatment with cytarabine, IL-2, or INF-alpha [2].

Acute polyneuropathy

Paclitaxel is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent in oncology that, in addition to causing chronic polyneuropathy, can induce paclitaxel-acute pain syndrome (P-APS). Up to 58% of patients treated with paclitaxel may experience P-APS, and 20% of these patients report pain ranging from 5 to 10 on the 10-point Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) pain scale. The muscle and joint pain experienced by patients most commonly affects the lower extremities, hips, and lower back. Pain experienced after the first infusion does not always correlate with complaints reported with subsequent infusions. The sensory neuropathy accompanying the disorder, including numbness and tingling, is more strongly expressed than autonomic or motor neuropathy [13, 14]. Importantly, patients reporting more severe pain are more likely to develop chronic polyneuropathy. Typically, symptoms appear up to 3 days after drug application and resolve spontaneously within a week. Both the mechanism of onset and prevention are unknown. Treatment is exclusively symptomatic and consists of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to relieve pain [3, 13]. Oxaliplatin is another chemotherapeutic agent that can cause acute neuropathy in addition to chronic neuropathy. Symptoms usually appear during the infusion or within hours after its completion and resolve spontaneously within hours or days. It is estimated that up to 96% of patients experience hand dysesthesia provoked by low temperature. Other manifestations of neuro­pathy include hand and foot paresthesia, cold-induced dysesthesia of the feet, mouth and throat, hand and forearm muscle spasms, trismus, eye pain, and tongue numbness [14, 15]. The incidence of grade 34 laryngeal dysesthesia according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is estimated at 12% of patients receiving oxaliplatin for advanced colorectal cancer [15].


Cisplatin is the chemotherapeutic agent with the highest ototoxic potential, leading to irreversible bilateral conductive and sensorineural hearing impairment in 2075% of those treated. Risk factors include younger age, high cumulative dose, duration of treatment, as well as pre-existing hearing loss, noise exposure, intake of other ototoxic substances, malnutrition, renal insufficiency, genetic predisposition, and radiotherapy to the cranial region [5, 16–18]. Initially, hearing impairment involves high-frequency sounds, and once the cumulative dose of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) is exceeded, it also involves mid-frequency sounds [17]. In addition, most patients report experiencing tinnitus, which can persist after treatment in up to 40% of those treated. This is another complication whose occurrence can reduce QoL by generating anxiety and insomnia, leading to the development of depression [19]. Other less ototoxic substances are carboplatin, vinca alkaloids, and oxaliplatin (Tab. 2) [5].

Table 2. Selected symptoms of cranial nerve damage along with the factor potentially inducing the disorder [1, 2]

Symptom of cranial nerve damage

Type of treatment used

Loss or deterioration of smell, taste


Each type of chemotherapy

Eyesight impairment







Hearing loss/deterioration





Oculomotor nerve dysfunction



Interferon alpha




Peripheral polyneuropathy induced by targeted drugs and immunotherapy

Neurological complications following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the form of anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD1, and anti-PD-L1 antibodies are rare, relatively understudied, but clinically relevant. Severe forms in grades 34, according to CTCAE v.4.0, affect < 1% of treated patients. Most of these are peripheral nerve dysfunction with clinical features of Guillain-Barré syndrome, peripheral polyneuropathy, meningoradiculitis, or myasthenia gravis. The mean time to onset of immune-related adverse event (irAE) is 6 weeks, except for myasthenia gravis, which may appear as early as after 3 weeks, more often with concomitant myositis and myocarditis, which increases the death rate (~20%) [20–28]. Guillain-Barré syndrome with progressive, symmetric ascending flaccid paresis of the lower limb muscles, weakness or abolition of deep reflexes, hemiparesis of the oculomotor muscles, autonomic disturbances (cardiac arrhythmias, arterial pressure fluctuations), and eventually respiratory failure, is a dose-independent, potentially life-threatening adverse effect of both platinum derivatives and ICIs [20]. These compounds can also cause damage to neuromuscular junctions, manifested by excessive muscle fatigue, drooping eyelids, double vision, slurred speech, impaired chewing and swallowing of food, and, in the end-stage of the disease, dyspnea due to respiratory muscle weakness [2, 3]. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine) is an antibody-drug conjugate that contains trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody bound to a microtubule inhibitor: emtansine (DM1). This drug can lead to clinically significant sensory polyneuropathy [29, 30].

Central nervous system adverse side effects


Isolated headaches are a common side effect of oncological treatment and the most common neurologic adverse effect of any pharmacotherapy. Risk factors for headache include a history of headache, blood-brain barrier-penetrating chemotherapy, and intrathecal administration of the drug. Headaches have been reported in 26% of patients receiving cetuximab for advanced colorectal cancer. Other drugs that promote headache include asparaginase, etoposide, fludarabine, methotrexate, rituximab, trastuzumab, tamoxifen, and temozolomide [1–3]. Headache may be a symptom of other neurological complications of systemic treatment, such as aseptic meningitis, posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome (PRES), idiopathic pseudotumor cerebri, or blood-brain barrier damage induced by radiotherapy [2].


Many drugs lower the seizure threshold, resulting in seizures. These include cisplatin, gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, etoposide, paclitaxel, or vincristine [1, 2]. Busulfan is a drug that is associated with a high risk of seizure induction. The risk of seizure occurrence is increased by intrathecal administration of drugs, especially cytarabine or methotrexate. Seizures may be an isolated adverse event or one of the manifestations of other treatment-induced conditions such as encephalopathy or PRES [1, 5].

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), commonly referred to as chemobrain, was first described in 1980. It is estimated to occur in 17% to 75% of patients receiving cancer treatment. Potential mechanisms that may contribute to the development of the disorder include direct neurotoxicity from chemotherapy, decreased levels of neurotransmitters, damage to cellular DNA, and hormonal and immune dysregulation. Cognitive disorders are usually of mild to moderate severity, manifested by deterioration of attention, memory, executive functions, prolonged information processing and reaction time, and limited vocabulary [31–33]. They lead to a reduced QoL; they make it difficult to return to work, reduce self-confidence, and impair social relationships [33, 34]. Subjectively, difficulties are greater than indicated by objective test results. CRCI is reported by more than 50% of patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, which translates into objective test scores in 1525% of them. The decline in cognitive function in the study occurred shortly after the start of treatment, with partial return of ability one year after the end of treatment. Observation of patients undergoing hormone therapy alone for breast cancer has shown that the use of anastrozole or tamoxifen may be associated with cognitive decline [33]. Among patients undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, cognitive impairment after 6 months was reported in 32%, i.e. twice as often as in patients not receiving chemotherapy; at 12 months after the end of treatment the relationship was no longer so clear. No difference in the severity of cognitive impairment has been observed between patients with disseminated and limited forms of colorectal cancer [33, 35]. The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer may impair cognitive abilities to a small extent, with eye-hand coordination being impaired more frequently [33]. Observation of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing targeted therapy with antiangiogenic drugs confirmed that this type of therapy causes cognitive deterioration in 31% of those treated [36]. Importantly, cognitive impairment is also reported by cancer patients who are not receiving chemotherapy. Thus, the phenomenon of chemobrain is difficult to assess objectively. It should be kept in mind that comorbid metabolic and endocrine disorders, anemia, fatigue, insomnia, or depression are all directly related to cancer, and oncological treatment itself may overlap with the CRCI picture [32].

Neurological complications of immunological treatment

Nervous system side effects occur in 6.1% of patients taking anti-PD-1 antibodies, 3.8% of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and 12% of those treated with a combination of both drugs (Tab. 3). The most common manifestation described is headache. Adverse effects induced by immunotherapy may appear already at the beginning of treatment, but also after its completion. The occurrence of pathological symptoms of the central nervous system requires high vigilance and quick differential diagnosis to exclude metabolic disorders, central nervous system metastases, neoplastic invasion of the cerebrospinal meninges or their inflammation and take action appropriate to the diagnosis [37–40]. Other central nervous system side effects induced by immunotherapy include aseptic meningitis, PRES, transverse myelitis, or encephalopathy (Tab. 4) [37, 39].

Table 3. The frequency of nervous system adverse side effects induced by antibodies used in systemic cancer treatment [45]


























< 1%





Myasthenia gravis 1%

Aseptic meningitis 0.2%

Intracerebral hemorrhage: 5% of patients with secondary CNS lesions receiving radiotherapy

Sleep disorders 15%

Convulsions 0.2%

Myasthenia gravis 1%

Walking difficulties 1%

Sleep disorders 1.21.5%

Convulsions 0.4%

Sleep disturbance 1.2%

Intracranial hemorrhage of at least CTC3 severity < 1%

In patients with secondary CNS lesions, seizures were observed in 713%, intracerebral hemorrhage in 4%, radionecrosis in 5%

Table 4. Selected neurological complications induced by oncological treatment


Manifestation and characteristics


Confusion, impaired consciousness, apathy, lethargy, impaired attention, hallucinations, agitation, and seizures [2, 3]

Acute encephalopathy has been described in 1025% of patients after ifosfamide treatment. Other substances that may induce encephalopathy include cisplatin, etoposide, mitomycin, fludarabine, and tamoxifen [2]

Risk factors for encephalopathy include the dose of the drug and its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, concomitant use of CYP2B6 inhibitors, renal failure, and hypoalbuminemia [5]

Cerebellar syndrome

Ataxia, gait disturbances, balance disorders, nystagmus, and scanning speech [2]

It may occur after molecularly targeted drugs such as trastuzumab or rituximab, as well as after classical chemotherapeutics such as cytarabine [2, 5]

Risk factors are hepatic and renal failure, age > 40 years, and high doses of drugs used [5]

Aseptic meningitis

Fever, headache, meningeal symptoms, and photophobia [37, 40]

Symptoms are associated with intrathecal administration of chemotherapeutics and result from irritation of the meninges. They usually appear 24 hours after drug application and symptoms resolve by 72 h [5]

Ipilimumab through abnormal activation of the immune system can induce aseptic meningitis [2]

Posterior reversible
leukoencephalopathy syndrome (PRES)

High blood pressure values, headache, dizziness, visual disturbances, disorders of consciousness, and seizures [2, 5]

The hypertensive crisis that may occur after the use of monoclonal antibodies that bind to vascular endothelial growth factor receptors may lead to the development of PRES. The occurrence of PRES has also been described after cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, or sunitinib [2]

The risk factors include pre-treatment hypertension, autoimmune disease, renal failure, high doses of anticancer drugs, organ transplant status, and immunosuppression [5]

Transverse myelitis

Symptoms of sensory and motor nerve damage, back and limb pain, paraplegia, and sphincter dysfunction [5, 40]

It may occur after intrathecal administration of methotrexate, cytarine, cisplatin, or thiotepa [5]

Risk factors are concurrent radiotherapy to the craniospinal region, and frequent intrathecal injections [5]


Focal neurological symptoms, hemiparesis, speech impairment, facial asymmetry, dizziness, and impaired consciousness [3]

An increased risk of thromboembolism and thus of ischemic stroke is associated with the use of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and bleomycin [5]. The use of angiogenesis inhibitors also increases the risk of stroke [2]

The occurrence of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke related to the use of chemotherapy is rare. The risk of stroke in the oncology patient population is similar to that in the general population [3]

Major depressive

Anhedonia, apathy, abulia, insomnia, tearfulness, lack of or excessive appetite

Mood disorders often accompany the diagnosis of cancer. However, there are groups of drugs whose use is associated with an increased risk of depressive disorders. These include procarbazine, carmustine, vinca alkaloids, pemetrexed, fludarabine, taxoids, cetuximab, imatinib, sorafenib, or sunitinib [3]

General principles of treatment of neurological complications induced by immunotherapy

In the case of mild severity (G1), immunotherapy can be continued with the implementation of simultaneous differential diagnosis excluding infectious and metabolic etiology, as well as disease progression [38–40].

In neurological disorders of moderate severity (G2), it is recommended to temporarily hold the treatment with simultaneous implementation of differential diagnostics and consideration of oral steroid therapy, i.e. prednisone 0.51 mg/kg body weight. After a reduction in the severity of symptoms, a gradual reduction in the steroid dose over at least 4 weeks to a maximum of 10 mg of prednisone daily is indicated. If the effect does not reappear after the reduction of the steroid dose, treatment can be resumed, but discontinuation of treatment is recommended in case of recurrent side effects of moderate severity [38–40].

In neurological side effects of high and very high severity (G3 and G4), immunotherapy should be discontinued without fail and intravenous steroid therapy should be instituted in the hospital setting, and if ineffective, immunosuppressive treatment should be instituted (Tab. 5) [38–40].

Table 5. Guidelines for diagnostic and therapeutic management of nervous system adverse side effects induced by immunotherapy based on NCCN 01.2022 [37, 44–46]

Frequency of side effects incidence
after administe-
ring ICI*



Myasthenia Gravis


Neurological consultation

Laboratory tests: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), aldolase, phosphocreatine kinase (CPK), acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR-Ab; present in 60% of cases of ICI-induced MG), striated muscle antibodies (i.e. anti-titin, anti-RyR, anti-RAPSN), tyrosine kinase antibodies (anti-MuSK).

Electrophysiological examinations to exclude myositis or neuropathy, i.e. electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction study (NCS)

Respiratory function tests

Additional tests:

  • in the case of suspected myocarditis: electrocardiography (ECG), transthoracic ultrasound (TTE), determination of troponins levels
  • in the case of suspected neoplasm invasion in the central nervous system or other potential causes of symptoms magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Management of symptoms of moderate severity (G2):

Definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy

Inpatient use of pyridostigmine initially at a dose of 30 mg 3 times daily, with gradual escalation to a maximum of 120 mg up to 4 times daily.

Consider inclusion of prednisone initially at a dose of 20 mg daily, with gradual dose escalation to 1 mg/kg per day (do not exceed 100 mg daily)

Management of symptoms of high severity (G3G4):

Definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy

Inpatient use of pharmacotherapy: methylprednisolone 12 mg/kg.

The use of plasmapheresis or intravenous preparations of immunoglobulin, and in the absence of their effectiveness, consider the addition of rituximab

Medications that may exacerbate symptoms of myasthenia gravis (i.e. ciprofloxacin, aminoglycosides, or beta-blockers) should be avoided, the respiratory system should be assessed and the patient’s neurological status should be monitored

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)


  • Neurological consultation
  • MRI of the spinal cord
  • Lumbar puncture (a general examination of the CSF should be performed and potentially infectious agents such as HSV or other viruses should be excluded depending on the clinical picture; CSF pressure should be measured)
  • Respiratory function tests
  • Electrophysiological examinations, i.e. electromyography (EMG), electroneurography (NCS)
  • Additional investigations: determination of specific serum anti-ganglioside antibodies (anti-GQ1b)

Management of moderate to severe symptoms (G2G4)

Definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy.

In-hospital administration of intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis with pulses of methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 gram daily for 5 days followed by gradual dose reduction over 4 weeks. Steroid therapy is not recommended for idiopathic GBS.

The patient should be evaluated neurologically, for respiratory distress and autonomic dysfunction.

1530% of patients with idiopathic GBS require assisted ventilation.

In case of pain, the following are used: gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine



  • Neurological consultation should be considered
  • Lumbar puncture (general examination of cerebrospinal fluid, tests to rule out viral infections including HSV)
  • MRI of the brain to exclude brain or meningeal metastases

Management of symptoms of moderate severity (G2):

Hold immunotherapy

Until a result is obtained to rule out HSV infection, it is recommended that acyclovir be considered for inclusion

After excluding a viral or bacterial etiology, consider starting steroid therapy i.e. prednisone 0.51 mg/kg per day or methylprednisolone 12 mg/kg per day

Management of symptoms of high severity (G3G4)

Consider definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy

Hospitalization of the patient

Consider inclusion of acyclovir pending PCR result for HSV

Once an infectious etiology of the complaint has been ruled out, consider starting steroid therapy i.e. prednisone 0.51 mg/kg per day or methylprednisolone 12 mg/kg per day


< 0.06%

  • Neurological consultation
  • MRI of the brain and spinal cord
  • Lumbar puncture (general examination of cerebrospinal fluid, tests to exclude viral infections, onconeuronal antibodies, oligoclonal bands).
  • Determination of vitamin B12 level, antinuclear antibodies ANA, anti-Ro, anti-La, anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4-IgG) antibodies, anti-myelin glycoprotein oligodendrocytes antibodies level, paraneoplastic antibodies determination (anti-Hu, anti-CRMP5, anti-CV2), ruling out HIV infection
  • Evaluation of the presence of constipation and urinary stasis based on bladder imaging

Definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy.

In-hospital initiation of methylprednisolone 1 g per day for 35 days, consideration of plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin preparations

Encephalitis (often with a limbic
less commonly


  • Neurological consultation
  • MRI of the brain
  • Lumbar puncture (general examination of cerebrospinal fluid, tests to exclude viral infections, i.e. HSV, paraneoplastic antibodies, oligoclonal bands, antineuronal autoantibodies; assessment of cerebrospinal fluid pressure)
  • Electroencephalography (EEG)
  • Laboratory tests: blood count, ESR, glucose, ionogram, total protein, albumin, aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, urea, CRP, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), TSH, fT3, fT4, TPO, thyroglobulin, paraneoplastic antibodies

Management of symptoms of moderate severity (G2):

Definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy

Consider intravenous acyclovir until PCR results are available to rule out HSV 1 and 2 infections

Initiate methylprednisolone at 12 mg/kg per day. Continue use for up to 4 weeks after resolution of symptoms

Management of symptoms of high severity (G3G4)

Definitive discontinuation of immunotherapy

Hospitalization of the patient

Methylprednisolone 1g i.v. for 35 days in combination with intravenous immunoglobulin preparations or plasmapheresis. This form of steroid therapy should also be considered in patients with observed progression of symptoms within 24 h or with the presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF

In selected cases i.e. autoimmune encephalopathy or no improvement after 714 days consider rituximab

Peripheral polyneuropathy


Factors that may induce polyneuropathy should be excluded, i.e. drugs, infections, metabolic or endocrine disorders, autoimmune diseases, and vascular diseases

Consider imaging the cerebrospinal axis

In CTCAE grade G2, consider neurological consultation and additional tests such as EMG or NCS

Diagnostic procedure for CTCAE grades G3G4 according to the Guillain-Barré guidelines

For mild symptoms (G1), consider withholding immunotherapy, and evaluate the severity of complaints after one week

In the case of moderate symptoms (G2), stop immunotherapy and consider starting prednisone 0.51 mg/kg orally. If symptoms progress, include methylprednisolone at 24 mg/kg/day

Consider including medications to alleviate pain associated with peripheral polyneuropathy such as gabapentin, pregabalin, or duloxetine

Treatment of severe cases (G3G4) is the same as in Guillain-Barré syndrome

Central nervous system adverse side effects induced by radiotherapy

Central nervous system (CNS) adverse side effects are divided into early ones, occurring up to 6 months after radiotherapy, and late ones, occurring after 6 months. Early adverse reactions are usually reversible and of low intensity [41, 42]. The most common in this group is fatigue syndrome, which occurs during or shortly after treatment. Other side effects include focal neurological symptoms, cognitive decline, or seizures. PRES induced by systemic therapy may also be a consequence of central nervous system radiotherapy. It appears already after 3 weeks of treatment and is caused by damage to the blood-brain barrier [2, 41, 42]. Leukoencephalopathy, which may manifest as slowly progressing cognitive disorders, personality changes, and even epileptic seizures, usually appears 12 years after whole-brain radiotherapy [41]. Another central nervous system side effect after radiotherapy is pseudoprogression of focal lesions, which occurs in 1264% of patients undergoing radiotherapy. It consists of an increase in the size of focal lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and an increase in central nervous system symptoms. It usually resolves within 6 months after irradiation. It is recognized that up to 30% of early tumor progression on imaging studies is pseudoprogression, and distinguishing between these two clinical situations is essential in making therapeutic decisions regarding the continuation of treatment in patients taking thalidomide [41, 42]. The late and most serious consequence of radiotherapy to the central nervous system area is radiation necrosis. In the literature, its incidence is estimated at up to 24% of patients undergoing radiotherapy, usually 1 to 3 years after the end of treatment, and the most vulnerable areas are the frontal and temporal lobes. The formation of necrosis results from perivascular inflammation, leading to white matter edema. Like in pseudoprogression, one risk factor for occurrence is concurrent chemotherapy. This complication may be asymptomatic or cause drowsiness, headaches, or neurological symptoms, whose picture depends on the location of necrotic lesions [41, 43]. Radiotherapy to the central nervous system and head and neck region increases the risk of stroke through the development of vasculopathy and acceleration of atherosclerosis. Radiotherapy-induced cavernous angiomas develop one to 26 years after irradiation and have a higher risk of bleeding and may cause seizures. Other vascular changes associated with radiation therapy include telangiectasias within the spinal cord vessels, which can be a source of bleeding. SMART (Stroke-like Migraine Attacks after Radiation Therapy) may manifest with episodes of focal neurologic symptoms or seizures and is another late radiation reaction occurring one to 30 years after the end of treatment. It is prevented with medications recommended for migraine prophylaxis [2, 42].


Systemic therapy used in oncology may generate numerous adverse effects on the nervous system. Neurotoxicity is a cause of drug dose reduction and treatment discontinuation; it may also be directly life-threatening. Although the majority of side effects are mild, they may diminish QoL, stigmatize the patient, and make it difficult to return to work or social activity after treatment.

Article Information and Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Magge RS, DeAngelis LM. The double-edged sword: Neurotoxicity of chemotherapy. Blood Rev. 2015; 29(2): 93100, doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2014.09.012, indexed in Pubmed: 25445718.
  2. Stone JB, DeAngelis LM. Cancer-treatment-induced neurotoxicity-focus on newer treatments. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016; 13(2): 92105, doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.152, indexed in Pubmed: 26391778.
  3. Kulejewska D. Układ nerwowy i zaburzenia psychiczne. In: Krzakowski M, Potemski P. ed. Działania niepożądane leczenia przeciwnowotworowego. Via Medica, Gdańsk 2020: 124132.
  4. Zajączkowska R, Kocot-Kępska M, Leppert W, et al. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(6), doi: 10.3390/ijms20061451, indexed in Pubmed: 30909387.
  5. Jordan B, Margulies A, Cardoso F, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org, EONS Education Working Group. Electronic address: eons.secretariat@cancernurse.eu, EANO Guideline Committee. Electronic address: office@eano.eu. Systemic anticancer therapy-induced peripheral and central neurotoxicity: ESMO-EONS-EANO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31(10): 13061319, doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.003, indexed in Pubmed: 32739407.
  6. Kerckhove N, Collin A, Condé S, et al. Long-Term Effects, Pathophysio­logical Mechanisms, and Risk Factors of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathies: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Front Pharmacol. 2017; 8: 86, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00086, indexed in Pubmed: 28286483.
  7. Cioroiu C, Weimer LH. Update on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017; 17(6): 47, doi: 10.1007/s11910-017-0757-7, indexed in Pubmed: 28421360.
  8. Miltenburg NC, Boogerd W. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A comprehensive survey. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014; 40(7): 872882, doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.04.004, indexed in Pubmed: 24830939.
  9. Matsuoka H, Iwase S, Miyaji T, et al. Additive Duloxetine for Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain Nonresponsive or Intolerant to Opioid-Pregabalin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (JORTC-PAL08). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019; 58(4): 645653, doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.020, indexed in Pubmed: 31254640.
  10. Smith EM, Pang H, Cirrincione C, et al. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013; 309(13): 13591367, doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2813, indexed in Pubmed: 23549581.
  11. Velasco R, Besora S, Argyriou AA, et al. Duloxetine against symptomatic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in cancer survivors: a real world, open-label experience. Anticancer Drugs. 2021; 32(1): 8894, doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001005, indexed in Pubmed: 33332891.
  12. Drat-Gzubicka J. Schorzenia nerwowo-mięśniowe u pacjentów z chorobą nowotworową Część I. Uszkodzenia nerwów obwodowych w chorobie nowotworowej. Medycyna Paliatywna w Praktyce. 2015; 9(1): 815.
  13. Loprinzi CL, Reeves BN, Dakhil SR, et al. Natural history of paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome: prospective cohort study NCCTG N08C1. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(11): 14721478, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0308, indexed in Pubmed: 21383290.
  14. Albany C, Dockter T, Wolfe E, et al. Cisplatin-associated neuropathy characteristics compared with those associated with other neurotoxic chemotherapy agents (Alliance A151724). Support Care Cancer. 2021; 29(2): 833840, doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05543-5, indexed in Pubmed: 32500206.
  15. Balayssac D, Ferrier J, Descoeur J, et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies: from clinical relevance to preclinical evidence. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011; 10(3): 407417, doi: 10.1517/14740338.2011.543417, indexed in Pubmed: 21210753.
  16. Chen Y, Bielefeld EC, Mellott JG, et al. Early Physiological and Cellular Indicators of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021; 22(2): 107126, doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00782-z, indexed in Pubmed: 33415542.
  17. Rybak LP, Mukherjea D, Jajoo S, et al. Cisplatin ototoxicity and protection: clinical and experimental studies. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009; 219(3): 177186, doi: 10.1620/tjem.219.177, indexed in Pubmed: 19851045.
  18. Schacht J, Talaska AE, Rybak LP. Cisplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics: hearing loss and its prevention. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012; 295(11): 18371850, doi: 10.1002/ar.22578, indexed in Pubmed: 23045231.
  19. El Charif O, Mapes B, Trendowski MR, et al. Clinical and Genome-wide Analysis of Cisplatin-induced Tinnitus Implicates Novel Ototoxic Mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(13): 41044116, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3179, indexed in Pubmed: 30952644.
  20. Pappa E, Berzero G, Herlin B, et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome During Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Oncologist. 2020; 25(1): e194e197, doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0255, indexed in Pubmed: 31615948.
  21. Johnson DB, Manouchehri A, Haugh AM, et al. Neurologic toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study. J Immunother Cancer. 2019; 7(1): 134, doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0617-x, indexed in Pubmed: 31118078.
  22. Cuzzubbo S, Javeri F, Tissier M, et al. Neurological adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 73: 18, doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.001, indexed in Pubmed: 28064139.
  23. Larkin J, Chmielowski B, Lao CD, et al. Neurologic Serious Adverse Events Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone in Advanced Melanoma, Including a Case Series of Encephalitis. Oncologist. 2017; 22(6): 709718, doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0487, indexed in Pubmed: 28495807.
  24. Touat M, Talmasov D, Ricard D, et al. Neurological toxicities associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017; 30(6): 659668, doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000503, indexed in Pubmed: 28938341.
  25. Mancone S, Lycan T, Ahmed T, et al. Severe neurologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single-center review. J Neurol. 2018; 265(7): 16361642, doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8890-z, indexed in Pubmed: 29761297.
  26. Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Toxicity Management Working Group. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017; 5(1): 95, doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z, indexed in Pubmed: 29162153.
  27. Kennedy LB, Salama AKS. A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(2): 86104, doi: 10.3322/caac.21596, indexed in Pubmed: 31944278.
  28. Chhabra N, Kennedy J. A Review of Cancer Immunotherapy Toxicity: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Med Toxicol. 2021; 17(4): 411424, doi: 10.1007/s13181-021-00833-8, indexed in Pubmed: 33826117.
  29. Diéras V, Harbeck N, Budd GT, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: an integrated safety analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(25): 27502757, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4999, indexed in Pubmed: 25024070.
  30. Battisti NM, Rogerson F, Lee K, et al. Safety and efficacy of T-DM1 in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer The Royal Marsden experience. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020; 24: 100188, doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100188, indexed in Pubmed: 32619830.
  31. Cascella M, Di Napoli R, Carbone D, et al. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment: mechanisms, clinical features and research perspectives. Recenti Prog Med. 2018; 109(11): 523530, doi: 10.1701/3031.30289, indexed in Pubmed: 30565571.
  32. Lv L, Mao S, Dong H, et al. Pathogenesis, Assessments, and Management of Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment (CRCI): An Updated Literature Review. J Oncol. 2020; 2020: 3942439, doi: 10.1155/2020/3942439, indexed in Pubmed: 32684930.
  33. Lange M, Joly F, Vardy J, et al. Cancer-related cognitive impairment: an update on state of the art, detection, and management strategies in cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(12): 19251940, doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz410, indexed in Pubmed: 31617564.
  34. van Dam FS, Schagen SB, Muller MJ, et al. Impairment of cognitive function in women receiving adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(3): 210218, doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.3.210, indexed in Pubmed: 9462678.
  35. Vardy JL, Dhillon HM, Pond GR, et al. Cognitive Function in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Do and Do Not Receive Chemotherapy: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Controlled Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(34): 40854092, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0905, indexed in Pubmed: 26527785.
  36. Joly F, Heutte N, Duclos B, et al. Prospective Evaluation of the Impact of Antiangiogenic Treatment on Cognitive Functions in Metastatic Renal Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2016; 2(6): 642649, doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.04.009, indexed in Pubmed: 28723499.
  37. Roth P, Winklhofer S, Müller AMS, et al. Neurological complications of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021; 97: 102189, doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102189, indexed in Pubmed: 33872978.
  38. Cybulska-Stopa B, Rutkowski P. Powikłania immunoterapii ( In: Wysocki P. ed. Immunoonkologia. Via Medica, Gdańsk 2019.
  39. Haanen JB, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(suppl_4): iv119iv142, doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225, indexed in Pubmed: 28881921.
  40. Ziobro M, Cybulska-Stopa B, Kamińska-Winciorek G, Rutkowski P. Bezpieczeństwo immunoterapii zasady postępowania profilaktyczno-terapeutycznego w przypadku wystąpienia działań niepożądanych (T. 18).
    Via Medica, Gdańsk 2018.
  41. Rymarowicz J, Bartosik-Psujek H. Neurologiczne powikłania po radioterapii nowotworów ośrodkowego układu nerwowego. Polski Przegląd Neurologiczny. 2019; 15(2): 8895, doi: 10.5603/ppn.2019.0017.
  42. Ziółkowska E, Wiśniewski T, Zarzycka M. Odczyn popromienny u chorych poddanych radioterapii z powodu nowotworów ośrodkowego układu nerwowego. Polski Przegląd Neurologiczny. 2014; 10(3): 106113.
  43. Daisne JF, De Ketelaere C, Jamart J. The individual risk of symptomatic radionecrosis after brain metastasis radiosurgery is predicted by a continuous function of the V12Gy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021; 27: 7074, doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.003, indexed in Pubmed: 33532633.
  44. Horta E, Bongiorno C, Ezzeddine M, et al. Neurotoxicity of antibodies in cancer therapy: A review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020; 188: 105566, doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105566, indexed in Pubmed: 31731087.
  45. Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, et al. Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022; 20(4): 387405, doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0020, indexed in Pubmed: 35390769.
  46. Seki M, Kitano S, Suzuki S. Neurological disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an association with autoantibodies. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022; 71(4): 769775, doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03053-9, indexed in Pubmed: 34515815.