Vol 13, No 6 (2017)
Review paper
Published online: 2018-01-04

open access

Page views 912
Article views/downloads 1170
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Clinical use of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer — literature review

Sylwia Dębska-Szmich, Piotr Potemski
DOI: 10.5603/OCP.2017.0034
Oncol Clin Pract 2017;13(6):281-294.

Abstract

Luminal subtype predominates in patients diagnosed with breast cancer — the incidence in developed countries is up to 80% of all cases. Hormonal therapy is an important part of the treatment; this is used as adjuvant treatment after radical surgery, and is also the preferred option of palliative systemic treatment. Unfortunately, during adjuvant hormonal treatment as well as palliative therapy, primary or secondary resistance may appear. To prevent and overcome these phenomena a strategy of combined pharmacological treatment was developed. In many clinical trials the effectiveness of doublets composed of hormonal and molecularly targeted drugs was assessed. So far, combination of hormonal therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors appears to be the most successful. Such a combination used in the first or further lines of palliative treatment prolongs progression-free survival. Moreover, its toxicity is relatively low and manageable. Until now, three drugs have been approved for treatment of breast cancer: palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. This review describes the mechanism of action of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors and summarises the most relevant trials, which have become the basis of these drugs’ approval.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Barrios C, Forbes JF, Jonat W, et al. The sequential use of endocrine treatment for advanced breast cancer: where are we? Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(6): 1378–1386.
  2. Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, et al. TEXT and SOFT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(2): 107–118.
  3. Bartsch R, Bago-Horvath Z, Berghoff A, et al. Ovarian function suppression and fulvestrant as endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(13): 1932–1938.
  4. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. The Lancet. 2005; 365(9472): 1687–1717.
  5. Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(6): 520–529.
  6. Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E, et al. 3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3). Breast. 2017; 31(1): 244–259.
  7. Wolff AC, Lazar AA, Bondarenko I, et al. Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(2): 195–202.
  8. Bachelot T, Bourgier C, Cropet C, et al. Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(22): 2718–2724.
  9. Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, et al. Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(33): 5529–5537.
  10. Marcom PK, Isaacs C, Harris L, et al. The combination of letrozole and trastuzumab as first or second-line biological therapy produces durable responses in a subset of HER2 positive and ER positive advanced breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007; 102(1): 43–49.
  11. Huober J, Fasching PA, Barsoum M, et al. Higher efficacy of letrozole in combination with trastuzumab compared to letrozole monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer - results of the eLEcTRA trial. Breast. 2012; 21(1): 27–33.
  12. Johnston S, Pippen J, Pivot X, et al. Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(33): 5538–5546.
  13. Burstein HJ, Cirrincione CT, Barry WT, et al. Endocrine therapy with or without inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of fulvestrant with or without lapatinib for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer-CALGB 40302 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(35): 3959–3966.
  14. Krop IE, Mayer IA, Ganju V, et al. Pictilisib for oestrogen receptor-positive, aromatase inhibitor-resistant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer (FERGI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(6): 811–821.
  15. Baselga J, Im SA, Iwata H. PIK3CA status in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) predicts efficacy of buparlisib (BUP) plus fulvestrant (FULV) in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer (BC): First results from the randomized, phase III BELLE-2 trial. ABCS. 2015; Abstract S6-01.
  16. Adelson K, Ramaswamy B, Sparano J, et al. Abstract S6-03: Randomized phase II trial of fulvestrant alone or in combination with bortezomib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors: A New York cancer consortium trial. Cancer Research. 2015; 75(9 Supplement): S6-03-S6–03.
  17. Yardley DA, Ismail-Khan RR, Melichar B, et al. Randomized phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of exemestane with or without entinostat in postmenopausal women with locally recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer progressing on treatment with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(17): 2128–2135.
  18. Blagosklonny MV, Pardee AB. Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013. The Restriction Point of the Cell Cycle. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6318/.
  19. VanArsdale T, Boshoff C, Arndt KT, et al. Molecular Pathways: Targeting the Cyclin D-CDK4/6 Axis for Cancer Treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(13): 2905–2910.
  20. Murphy CG, Dickler MN. The Role of CDK4/6 Inhibition in Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2015; 20(5): 483–490.
  21. Gelbert LM, Cai S, Lin Xi, et al. Preclinical characterization of the CDK4/6 inhibitor LY2835219: in-vivo cell cycle-dependent/independent anti-tumor activities alone/in combination with gemcitabine. Invest New Drugs. 2014; 32(5): 825–837.
  22. Polk A, Kolmos IL, Kümler I, et al. Specific CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: a systematic review of current clinical evidence. ESMO Open. 2016; 1(6): e000093.
  23. Johnson SM, Torrice CD, Bell JF, et al. Mitigation of hematologic radiation toxicity in mice through pharmacological quiescence induced by CDK4/6 inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(7): 2528–2536.
  24. Dean JL, McClendon AK, Knudsen ES. Modification of the DNA damage response by therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(34): 29075–29087.
  25. Thangavel C, Dean JL, Ertel A, et al. Therapeutically activating RB: reestablishing cell cycle control in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011; 18(3): 333–345.
  26. Abraham R, VanArsdale T, Shields D, et al. Abstract SY34-03: Braking the cycle: Inhibition of the cyclin D-Cdk4/6 pathway in breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2014; 74(19 Supplement): SY34-03-SY34–03.
  27. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012; 490(7418): 61–70.
  28. Finn RS, Dering J, Conklin D, et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11(5): R77.
  29. Patnaik A, Rosen LS, Tolaney SM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib, an Inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, for Patients with Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Other Solid Tumors. Cancer Discov. 2016; 6(7): 740–753.
  30. O'Brien N, Tomaso E, Ayala R, et al. Abstract 4756: In vivo efficacy of combined targeting of CDK4/6, ER and PI3K signaling in ER+ breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2014; 74(19 Supplement): 4756–4756.
  31. DeMichele A, Clark AS, Tan KS, et al. CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (PD0332991) in Rb+ advanced breast cancer: phase II activity, safety, and predictive biomarker assessment. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(5): 995–1001.
  32. Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(1): 25–35.
  33. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(20): 1925–1936.
  34. Finn RS, Crown JP, Ettl J, et al. Efficacy and safety of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: expanded analyses of subgroups from the randomized pivotal trial PALOMA-1/TRIO-18. Breast Cancer Res. 2016; 18(1): 67.
  35. Rugo H, Dieras V, Gelmon KA, et al. Impact of palbociclib plus letrozole on health related quality of life (HRQOL) compared with letrozole alone in treatment naïve postmenopausal patients with ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from PALOMA-2. Annals of Oncology. 2016; 27(suppl_6).
  36. Finn RS, Crown J, Lang I, et al. Overall survival results from the randomized phase II study of palbociclib (P) in combination with letrozole (L) vs letrozole alone for frontline treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1; TRIO-18). . ;34(suppl; abstr 1001). J Clin Oncol 2017;34(suppl; abstr 1001) DOI: 10 1200/JCO 2017 35. ; 15(suppl.1001).
  37. Turner NC, Ro J, André F, et al. PALOMA3 Study Group. Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(3): 209–219.
  38. Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(4): 425–439.
  39. https://clinicaltrials.gov.
  40. Infante JR, Shapiro G, Witteveen P, et al. A phase I study of the single-agent CDK4/6 inhibitor LEE011 in pts with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. J Clin Oncol ;(suppl):2528a. DOI: 10 1200/jco 2014 32. ; 15(suppl.2528).
  41. Curigliano G, Gómez Pardo P, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Ribociclib plus letrozole in early breast cancer: A presurgical, window-of-opportunity study. Breast. 2016; 28: 191–198.
  42. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(18): 1738–1748.
  43. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase 3 trial of first-line ribociclib + letrozole in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–), advanced breast cancer (ABC). J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(suppl.:1038-1038).
  44. Verma S, et al. O'Shaughnessy J, Burris HA MONALEESA-2 Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib + letrozole: Results from MONALEESA-2. J Clin Oncol 2017. 2017; 35(suppl.1020-1020).
  45. Janni W, Burris HA, Blackwell KL, et al. First-line ribociclib plus letrozole for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC): MONALEESA-2 safety results. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(suppl):1047-1047. ; 15(suppl.1047).
  46. Juric D, Ismail-Khan R, Campone M, et al. Abstract P3-14-01: Phase Ib/II study of ribociclib and alpelisib and letrozole in ER+, HER2– breast cancer: Safety, preliminary efficacy and molecular analysis. Cancer Research. 2016; 76(4 Supplement): P3-14-01-P3-14–01.
  47. Bardia A, Modi S, Oliveira M, et al. Abstract P6-13-01: Triplet therapy with ribociclib, everolimus, and exemestane in women with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2016; 76(4 Supplement): P6-13-01-P6-13–01.
  48. Tolaney SM, Lin NU, Thornton D, et al. Abemaciclib for the treatment of brain metastases (BM) secondary to hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(suppl.1019-1019).
  49. Hurvitz S, Abad MF, Rostorfer R, et al. Interim results from neoMONARCH: A neoadjuvant phase II study of abemaciclib in postmenopausal women with HR + /HER2- breast cancer (BC). Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(suppl_6: ).
  50. Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, et al. MONARCH 1, A Phase II Study of Abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitor, as a Single Agent, in Patients with Refractory HR(+)/HER2(-) Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(17): 5218–5224.
  51. Sledge GW, Toi M, Neven P, et al. MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(25): 2875–2884.
  52. Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(32): 3638–3646.