open access

Vol 71, No 6 (2021)
Research paper (original)
Published online: 2021-11-04
Get Citation

The scope of complementary and alternative medicine in Poland

Adrian Perdyan1, Magdalena Wasiukiewicz2, Piotr Szastok2, Jacek Jassem3
·
Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2021;71(6):357-372.
Affiliations
  1. International Research Agenda 3P Medicine Laboratory, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
  2. Student Scientific Circle of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
  3. Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

open access

Vol 71, No 6 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2021-11-04

Abstract

Introduction. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widely used by patients. The most frequent CAM users are patients with cancer, but patients with other chronic diseases also utilize these methods.

Materials and methods. Data on the use of CAM were obtained from Google searches. For each specific search term, the first three Google pages were analyzed.

Results. The analysis included 91 CAM institutions matching the inclusion criteria. The most common anticancer servi­ces were intravenous vitamin C infusion, saltwater, intravenous infusion of glutathione, colon irrigation, an anticancer diet, bio-resonance, and intravenous ozone infusions. The most common non-cancer entities treated were rheumatic diseases, chronic fatigue syndrome, arterial hypertension, allergies, borreliosis, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and depression. Anticancer therapies were more expensive than those used for non-malignant diseases (medians 250 PLN and 170 PLN, respectively; p = 0.041).

Conclusions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of CAM methods used in Poland. These data may facilitate social education and the development of preventive measures.

Abstract

Introduction. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widely used by patients. The most frequent CAM users are patients with cancer, but patients with other chronic diseases also utilize these methods.

Materials and methods. Data on the use of CAM were obtained from Google searches. For each specific search term, the first three Google pages were analyzed.

Results. The analysis included 91 CAM institutions matching the inclusion criteria. The most common anticancer servi­ces were intravenous vitamin C infusion, saltwater, intravenous infusion of glutathione, colon irrigation, an anticancer diet, bio-resonance, and intravenous ozone infusions. The most common non-cancer entities treated were rheumatic diseases, chronic fatigue syndrome, arterial hypertension, allergies, borreliosis, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and depression. Anticancer therapies were more expensive than those used for non-malignant diseases (medians 250 PLN and 170 PLN, respectively; p = 0.041).

Conclusions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of CAM methods used in Poland. These data may facilitate social education and the development of preventive measures.

Get Citation

Keywords

complementary medicine; alternative medicine; cancer; chronic diseases

About this article
Title

The scope of complementary and alternative medicine in Poland

Journal

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology

Issue

Vol 71, No 6 (2021)

Article type

Research paper (original)

Pages

357-372

Published online

2021-11-04

Page views

6219

Article views/downloads

710

DOI

10.5603/NJO.a2021.0068

Bibliographic record

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2021;71(6):357-372.

Keywords

complementary medicine
alternative medicine
cancer
chronic diseases

Authors

Adrian Perdyan
Magdalena Wasiukiewicz
Piotr Szastok
Jacek Jassem

References (28)
  1. Carson JW, Treggiari MM, Mauer KM, et al. Complementary and Alternative Medicine Services at Pain Treatment Clinics: A National Survey of Pain Medicine Specialists in the United States. J Altern Complement Med. 2021; 27(4): 349–351.
  2. Adeniyi O, Washington L, Glenn CJ, et al. The use of complementary and alternative medicine among hypertensive and type 2 diabetic patients in Western Jamaica: A mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2): e0245163.
  3. Li H, Kreiner JM, Wong AR, et al. Oral application of Chinese herbal medicine for allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phytother Res. 2021; 35(6): 3113–3129.
  4. Chiao YW, Livneh H, Guo HR, et al. Use of Chinese Herbal Medicines Is Related to a Reduction in Depression Risk Among Patients With Insomnia: A Matched Cohort Study. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 583485.
  5. Shirvani-Rad S, Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Mohseni S, et al. Probiotics as a Complementary Therapy for Management of Obesity: A Systematic Review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021; 2021: 6688450.
  6. Akour A, Abuloha S, Mulakhudair AR, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine for urinary tract illnesses: A cross-sectional survey in Jordan. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021; 43: 101321.
  7. Lantos PM, Shapiro ED, Auwaerter PG, et al. Unorthodox alternative therapies marketed to treat Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 60(12): 1776–1782.
  8. Huebner J, Prott FJ, Muecke R, et al. Prevention and Integrative Oncology of the German Cancer Society Working Group. Economic Evaluation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology: Is There a Difference Compared to Conventional Medicine? Med Princ Pract. 2017; 26(1): 41–49.
  9. Silvers WS, Bailey HK. Integrative approach to allergy and asthma using complementary and alternative medicine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014; 112(4): 280–285.
  10. Mbizo J, Okafor A, Sutton MA, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use among persons with multiple chronic conditions: results from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018; 18(1): 281.
  11. Lewith G, Stuart B, Chalder T, et al. Complementary and alternative healthcare use by participants in the PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2016; 87: 37–42.
  12. John GM, Hershman DL, Falci L, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use among US cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016; 10(5): 850–864.
  13. Calcagni N, Gana K, Quintard B. A systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine in oncology: Psychological and physical effects of manipulative and body-based practices. PLoS One. 2019; 14(10): e0223564.
  14. Borm KJ, Schiller K, Asadpour R, et al. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Radiotherapy: A Comprehensive Review. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020; 29(3): 149–156.
  15. Ludmir EB, Jethanandani A, Mainwaring W, et al. The Trials (and Tribulations) of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019; 111(12): 1358–1360.
  16. Knecht K, Kinder D, Stockert A. Biologically-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use in Cancer Patients: The Good, the Bad, the Misunderstood. Front Nutr. 2019; 6: 196.
  17. CBOS report BS/133/2011 in Horoscopes, predictions, talismans- that is magic around us. 8-11 September 2011. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2011/K_133_11.PDF (11.05.2021).
  18. Jȩdrzejewski M, Thallinger C, Mrozik M, et al. Public perception of cancer care in Poland and Austria. Oncologist. 2015; 20(1): 28–36.
  19. Scarton LA, Del Fiol G, Oakley-Girvan I, et al. Understanding cancer survivors' information needs and information-seeking behaviors for complementary and alternative medicine from short- to long-term survival: a mixed-methods study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018; 106(1): 87–97.
  20. Duleba K, Wysocki M, Styczyński J. Physicians attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in patients with cancer: preliminary report from pediatric and oncology centers. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2008; 12(4 Pt 2): 1148–1154.
  21. Olchowska-Kotala A, Barański J. Polish physicians' attitudes to complementary and alternative medicine. Complement Ther Med. 2016; 27: 51–57.
  22. Keene MR, Heslop IM, Sabesan SS, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019; 35: 33–47.
  23. Puskulluoglu M, Uchańska B, Tomaszewski K, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among Polish cancer patients. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology. 2021; 71(5): 274–281.
  24. Zasowska-Nowak A, Nowak PJ, Ciałkowska-Rysz A. High-Dose Vitamin C in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients. Nutrients. 2021; 13(3).
  25. Emerytura 2412 zł (PLN) brutto, ile to netto? 2021 netto-brutto.eu. https://netto-brutto.eu/emerytura/2412 (19.04.2021).
  26. 5973 zł brutto ile to netto - umowa o pracę - wynagrodzenia.pl. https://wynagrodzenia.pl/brutto-netto/umowa-o-prace/5973-brutto-ile-to-netto (19.04.2021).
  27. Alsawaf MA, Jatoi A. Shopping for nutrition-based complementary and alternative medicine on the Internet: how much money might cancer patients be spending online? J Cancer Educ. 2007; 22(3): 174–176.
  28. Aydin Avci I, Koç Z, Sağlam Z. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with cancer in northern Turkey: analysis of cost and satisfaction. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21(5-6): 677–688.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Wydawcą serwisu jest VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl