open access

Vol 53, No 5 (2019)
Research Paper
Submitted: 2019-02-21
Accepted: 2019-07-28
Published online: 2019-09-20
Get Citation

Association of trans-myocardial repolarisation parameters with size of the diffusion limitation area in acute ischaemic stroke

Hüseyin Uzunosmanoğlu1, Osman Korucu2, Emine Emektar1, Şeref Kerem Çorbacıoğlu1, Çiğdem Hacıfazlıoğlu3, Yunsur Çevik1
·
Pubmed: 31538656
·
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(5):363-368.
Affiliations
  1. Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Emergency Department, Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Acil servis, 06000 Ankara, Türkiye
  2. Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurology, Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye
  3. Yenimahalle Training and Researh Hospital, Radiology Department, Yenimahalle Training and Researh Hospital, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Türkiye

open access

Vol 53, No 5 (2019)
Research papers
Submitted: 2019-02-21
Accepted: 2019-07-28
Published online: 2019-09-20

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between transmyocardial repolarisation parameters and the size of the diffusion limitation area measured using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) in patients diagnosed with ischaemic stroke without known cardiac diseases.

Material and methods.
The study was a prospective, observational clinical study. Patients without cardiac disease with acute ischaemic stroke were included in the study. Electrocardiography (ECG) was received from the patients. P, QT, QTc and Tp-e dispersions were calculated. All the patients had computerised brain tomography (CT) and then DWMRI carried out so as to calculate infarct areas.

Results.
Seventy ischaemic stroke patients and 30 control patients were included in the study. All parameters except for QTc dispersion (p = 0.88) were higher in the stroke group than in the control group (p < 0.05 for all values). The infarct area calculated with DWMRI was divided into four groups according to quartiles, and QT, QTc, P, and Tp-e dispersions of patients were evaluated. Patients were found to have a prolonged dispersion as the infarct area expanded, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05 for all values).

Conclusions.
When we compared the patients with ischaemic stroke who had no known cardiac disease to those in the control group we found an increase in transmyocardial repolarisation parameters. As diffusion limitation areas grew larger, QT, QTc, P, and Tp-e dispersions increased. Physicians should be aware of dysrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in acute stroke and should observe these patients, especially those with larger stroke lesions.

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between transmyocardial repolarisation parameters and the size of the diffusion limitation area measured using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) in patients diagnosed with ischaemic stroke without known cardiac diseases.

Material and methods.
The study was a prospective, observational clinical study. Patients without cardiac disease with acute ischaemic stroke were included in the study. Electrocardiography (ECG) was received from the patients. P, QT, QTc and Tp-e dispersions were calculated. All the patients had computerised brain tomography (CT) and then DWMRI carried out so as to calculate infarct areas.

Results.
Seventy ischaemic stroke patients and 30 control patients were included in the study. All parameters except for QTc dispersion (p = 0.88) were higher in the stroke group than in the control group (p < 0.05 for all values). The infarct area calculated with DWMRI was divided into four groups according to quartiles, and QT, QTc, P, and Tp-e dispersions of patients were evaluated. Patients were found to have a prolonged dispersion as the infarct area expanded, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05 for all values).

Conclusions.
When we compared the patients with ischaemic stroke who had no known cardiac disease to those in the control group we found an increase in transmyocardial repolarisation parameters. As diffusion limitation areas grew larger, QT, QTc, P, and Tp-e dispersions increased. Physicians should be aware of dysrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in acute stroke and should observe these patients, especially those with larger stroke lesions.

Get Citation

Keywords

stroke, diffusion-limitation area, trans-myocardial repolarisation parameters, electrocardiography

About this article
Title

Association of trans-myocardial repolarisation parameters with size of the diffusion limitation area in acute ischaemic stroke

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Vol 53, No 5 (2019)

Article type

Research Paper

Pages

363-368

Published online

2019-09-20

Page views

1008

Article views/downloads

259

DOI

10.5603/PJNNS.a2019.0041

Pubmed

31538656

Bibliographic record

Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(5):363-368.

Keywords

stroke
diffusion-limitation area
trans-myocardial repolarisation parameters
electrocardiography

Authors

Hüseyin Uzunosmanoğlu
Osman Korucu
Emine Emektar
Şeref Kerem Çorbacıoğlu
Çiğdem Hacıfazlıoğlu
Yunsur Çevik

References (26)
  1. Aygencel G, Karamercan A, Akinci E, et al. Metabolic syndrome and its association with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Adv Ther. 2006; 23(3): 495–501.
  2. Khechinashvili G, Asplund K. Electrocardiographic changes in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002; 14(2): 67–76.
  3. Jensen JK, Bak S, Flemming Høilund-Carlsen P, et al. Prevalence of electrocardiographic ST-T changes during acute ischemic stroke in patients without known ischemic heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 128(1): 137–138.
  4. Tokgözoglu SL, Batur MK, Topçuoglu MA, et al. Effects of stroke localization on cardiac autonomic balance and sudden death. Stroke. 1999; 30(7): 1307–1311.
  5. Oppenheimer SM, Cechetto DF, Hachinski VC. Cerebrogenic cardiac arrhythmias. Cerebral electrocardiographic influences and their role in sudden death. Arch Neurol. 1990; 47(5): 513–519.
  6. Kautzner J, Malik M. QT interval dispersion and its clinical utility. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997; 20(10 Pt 2): 2625–2640.
  7. Aitchison JD, Campbell RW, Higham PD, et al. QT dispersion. Br Heart J. 1994; 71(6): 508–510.
  8. Castro Hevia J, Antzelevitch C, Tornés Bárzaga F, et al. Tpeak-Tend and Tpeak-Tend dispersion as risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(9): 1828–1834.
  9. Morin DP, Saad MN, Shams OF, et al. Relationships between the T-peak to T-end interval, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and death in left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Europace. 2012; 14(8): 1172–1179.
  10. Panikkath R, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, et al. Prolonged Tpeak-to-tend interval on the resting ECG is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(4): 441–447.
  11. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Bellolio MF, et al. Prolonged QTc as a predictor of mortality in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 18(6): 469–474.
  12. Hjalmarsson C, Bokemark L, Fredriksson S, et al. Can prolonged QTc and cTNT level predict the acute and long-term prognosis of stroke? Int J Cardiol. 2012; 155(3): 414–417.
  13. Lederman YS, Balucani C, Lazar J, et al. Relationship between QT interval dispersion in acute stroke and stroke prognosis: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014; 23(10): 2467–2478.
  14. Goldstein DS. The electrocardiogram in stroke: relationship to pathophysiological type and comparison with prior tracings. Stroke. 1979; 10(3): 253–259.
  15. Golan S, Livneh A. [ECG changes during stroke]. Harefuah. 2008; 147(6): 568–9, 572.
  16. Okutucu S, Aytemir K, Oto A. P-wave dispersion: What we know till now? JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016; 5: 2048004016639443.
  17. Gialafos J, Dilaveris P, Gialafos E, et al. P Wave Dispersion: A Valuable Electrocardiographic Marker for the Prediction of Paroxysmal Lone Atrial Fibrillation. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 1999; 4(1): 39–45.
  18. Oppenheimer S. Cerebrogenic cardiac arrhythmias: cortical lateralization and clinical significance. Clin Auton Res. 2006; 16(1): 6–11.
  19. Purushothaman S, Salmani D, Prarthana KG, et al. Study of ECG changes and its relation to mortality in cases of cerebrovascular accidents. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014; 5(2): 434–436.
  20. Emektar E, Çorbacıoğlu ŞK, Korucu O, et al. The evaluation of a new marker of transmyocardial repolarization parameters in ischemic stroke patients; T -T (T ), T /QT. Acta Neurol Belg. 2017; 117(2): 461–467.
  21. Lazar J, Busch D, Wirkowski E, et al. Changes in QT dispersion after thrombolysis for stroke. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 125(2): 258–262.
  22. - Ch, Garg A, Yadav A, et al. QT- dispersion in patients with stroke without known cardiac disease. JIACM. 2011; 12: 102–105.
  23. Lazar J, Manzella S, Moonjelly J, et al. The prognostic value of QT dispersion in patients presenting with acute neurological events. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003; 15(1): 31–35.
  24. Afsar N, Fak AS, Metzger JT, et al. Acute stroke increases QT dispersion in patients without known cardiac diseases. Arch Neurol. 2003; 60(3): 346–350.
  25. Letsas KP, Weber R, Astheimer K, et al. Tpeak-Tend interval and Tpeak-Tend/QT ratio as markers of ventricular tachycardia inducibility in subjects with Brugada ECG phenotype. Europace. 2010; 12(2): 271–274.
  26. Lubinski A, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Wnuk-Wojnar AM, et al. The terminal portion of the T wave: a new electrocardiographic marker of risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000; 23(11 Pt 2): 1957–1959.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl