Vol 3, No 4 (2018)
Original article
Published online: 2018-12-19

open access

Page views 975
Article views/downloads 1017
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Rationale and design of PREvalence of DyspneA in patients treated with TicagrelOR (PREDATOR) program

Michalina Kołodziejczak12, Eliano Pio Navarese1234, Jacek Kubica1
Medical Research Journal 2018;3(4):215-220.

Abstract

Background: Ticagrelor, a reversible P2Y12 inhibitor, is a mainstay of antiplatelet strategy in patients with
acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, a large number of ticagrelor-induced dyspnea decrease patients’
adherence and reduce an overall efficacy of the therapy.


Design: The PREDATOR program consists of phase III and IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled clinical trials and preceding pilot studies that assesses the prevalence and treatment
of ticagrelor-induced dyspnea in coronary artery disease (CAD) and ACS patients. The PREDATOR LD
is designed to evaluate the occurrence of dyspnea after 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose, and relief of
dyspnea by theophylline administration in low-to-high risk acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment
elevation (NSTE-ACS) and stable CAD designated to undergo invasive treatment. The PREDATOR MD is
a cross-over trial in stable CAD patients 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS. Enrolled
patients will be randomized to one of four antiplatelet treatment regimens (ticagrelor 2x90 mg, ticagrelor
2x60 mg, ticagrelor 2x45 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg [morning]+placebo [evening]) or placebo and will be
assessed for dyspnea at the day 7, then undergo a switch of treatment and reassessment at day 14. The
sample size will be estimated based on preceding pilot studies.

Discussion: The PREDATOR LD is expected to prospectively assess dyspnea rate with a loading dose
of ticagrelor, and analyze a potential of theophylline to elevate symptoms of ticagrelor-induced dyspnea,
while the PREDATOR MD will prospectively assess dyspnea and adverse events rate with a maintenance
dose of P2Y12 inhibitors prospectively assess. All evaluations will be conducted using standardized
metrics for dyspnea quantification.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group . 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018 [Epub ahead of print].
  2. O’Gara P, Kushner F, Ascheim D, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary. Circulation. 2013; 127(4): 529–555.
  3. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 130(25): e344–e426.
  4. Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Grüntzig Lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(47): 3320–3331.
  5. Adamski P, Sikora J, Laskowska E, et al. Comparison of bioavailability and antiplatelet action of ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A prospective, observational, single-centre study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10): e0186013.
  6. Adamski P, Ostrowska M, Sikora J, et al. Comparison of Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in STEMI and NSTEMI Patients (PINPOINT): protocol for a prospective, observational, single-centre study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(4): e013218.
  7. Adamski P, Adamska U, Ostrowska M, et al. New directions for pharmacotherapy in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016; 17(17): 2291–2306.
  8. Adamski P, Buszko K, Sikora J, et al. Metabolism of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 11746.
  9. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11): 1045–1057.
  10. Adamski P, Koziński M, Ostrowska M, et al. Overview of pleiotropic effects of platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Thromb Haemost. 2014; 112(2): 224–242.
  11. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al. PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Steering Committee and Investigators. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(19): 1791–1800.
  12. Kubica A, Kosobucka A, Fabiszak T, et al. Assessment of adherence to medication in patients after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Is there a place for newself-reported questionnaires? Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 [Epub ahead of print]: 1–9.
  13. Kosobucka A, Michalski P, Pietrzykowski Ł, et al. Adherence to treatment assessed with the Adherence in Chronic Diseases Scale in patients after myocardial infarction. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12: 333–340.
  14. Kubica J, Adamski P, Buszko K, et al. Rationale and Design of the Effectiveness of LowEr maintenanCe dose of TicagRelor early After myocardial infarction (ELECTRA) pilot study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018; 4(3): 152–157.
  15. Kubica A, Obońska K, Fabiszak T, et al. Adherence to antiplatelet treatment with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Is there anything we can do to improve it? A systematic review of randomized trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016; 32(8): 1441–1451.
  16. Kubica A, Kasprzak M, Obońska K, et al. Discrepancies in assessment of adherence to antiplatelet treatment after myocardial infarction. Pharmacology. 2015; 95(1-2): 50–58.
  17. Kubica A, Kasprzak M, Siller-Matula J, et al. Time-related changes in determinants of antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients after myocardial infarction. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014; 742: 47–54.
  18. Storey RF, Becker RC, Harrington RA, et al. Characterization of dyspnoea in PLATO study patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel and its association with clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(23): 2945–2953.
  19. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Oude Ophuis T, et al. Long-term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for the Secondary Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Secondary Analysis of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1(4): 425–432.
  20. Adamski P, Adamska U, Ostrowska M, et al. Evaluating current and emerging antithrombotic therapy currently available for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome in geriatric populations. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018; 19(13): 1415–1425.
  21. Li YH, Fang CY, Hsieh IC, et al. 2018 Expert Consensus on the Management of Adverse Effects of Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Taiwan. Acta Cardiologica Sinica. 2018;34(3):201-10. Epub 2018/05/31. doi: 10.6515/acs.201805_34(3).20180302a. PubMed PMID: 29844641; PubMed Central PMCID. : PMCPMC5968336.
  22. Gaubert M, Laine M, Richard T, et al. Effect of ticagrelor-related dyspnea on compliance with therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 173(1): 120–121.
  23. Cattaneo M, Faioni EM. Why does ticagrelor induce dyspnea? Thromb Haemost. 2012; 108(6): 1031–1036.
  24. Caldeira D, Pinto FJ, Ferreira JJ. Dyspnea and reversibility profile of P2Y₁₂ antagonists: systematic review of new antiplatelet drugs. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014; 14(4): 303–311.
  25. Minner SA, Simone P, Chung BB, et al. Successful Reversal of Bradycardia and Dyspnea With Aminophylline After Ticagrelor Load. J Pharm Pract. 2018; 31(1): 112–114.
  26. Lindholm D, James S, Andersson J, et al. Caffeine and incidence of dyspnea in patients treated with ticagrelor. Am Heart J. 2018; 200: 141–143.