open access

Vol 3, No 2 (2018)
Original article
Published online: 2018-07-31
Get Citation

Cognitive functions in patieCognitive functions in patients after cataract phacoemulsification and implantation of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lnts after cataract phacoemulsification and implantation of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses

Martyna Gębska-Tołoczko1, Jakub J. Kałużny1, Agata Żaroń2, Beata Danek3, Joanna Pulkowska-Ulfig2, Oliwia Beck2, Milena Wojciechowska2, Bartłomiej J. Kałużny4
·
Medical Research Journal 2018;3(2):70-75.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Biology of the Visual System, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Sandomierska 16, 85-830 Bydgoszcz, Poland
  2. Department of Public Health, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland, Poland
  3. Oftalmika Eye Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland, Poland
  4. Department of Optometry, ul. Dębowa 3, 85-626 Bydgoszcz, Poland

open access

Vol 3, No 2 (2018)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2018-07-31

Abstract

Introduction: The study has to determine whether implantation of diffractive multifocal lenses during cataract phacoemulsification causes distortion of the cognitive aspects of processing perceptual information.

Material and methods: 25 patients who underwent cataract phacoemulsification with the implantation of diffractive multifocal lens Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 in both eyes (multifocal group) and 26 patients with the implantation of monofocal intraocular lens Acrysof IQ SN60WF in both eyes (monofocal group) were enrolled. All patients underwent ophthalmic examination and cognitive function– Trial Making Test (Part A and Part B) and Stroop Test (Stroop Test 1 and Stroop Test 2) tests at least 6 months after cataract surgery of the other eye.

Results: Mean patient age and visual acuity with correction for near and far vision did not differ between groups. Average Trail Making scores were 32.80 ± 11.86 s and 84.08 ± 33.26 s for Parts A and B, respectively, in the multifocal group, while scores in the monofocal group were 36.61 ± 13.63 s and 93.34 ± 40.49 s in Parts A and B. Stroop Test scores were 79.09 ± 17.69 s and 133.64 ± 17.60 s for Stroop Test 1 and Stroop Test 2, respectively, in the multifocal group; in the monofocal group, scores were 82.04 ± 17.51 s and 152.88 ± 65.72 s, respectively. The groups did not differ for either test.

Conclusions: Differences between cognitive function tests results between patients with multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses were not statistically significant suggesting the lack of influence of the type of lens on visual perception at least in good light conditions. Further clinical trials using more sophisticate tests in different light conditions are needed.

Abstract

Introduction: The study has to determine whether implantation of diffractive multifocal lenses during cataract phacoemulsification causes distortion of the cognitive aspects of processing perceptual information.

Material and methods: 25 patients who underwent cataract phacoemulsification with the implantation of diffractive multifocal lens Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 in both eyes (multifocal group) and 26 patients with the implantation of monofocal intraocular lens Acrysof IQ SN60WF in both eyes (monofocal group) were enrolled. All patients underwent ophthalmic examination and cognitive function– Trial Making Test (Part A and Part B) and Stroop Test (Stroop Test 1 and Stroop Test 2) tests at least 6 months after cataract surgery of the other eye.

Results: Mean patient age and visual acuity with correction for near and far vision did not differ between groups. Average Trail Making scores were 32.80 ± 11.86 s and 84.08 ± 33.26 s for Parts A and B, respectively, in the multifocal group, while scores in the monofocal group were 36.61 ± 13.63 s and 93.34 ± 40.49 s in Parts A and B. Stroop Test scores were 79.09 ± 17.69 s and 133.64 ± 17.60 s for Stroop Test 1 and Stroop Test 2, respectively, in the multifocal group; in the monofocal group, scores were 82.04 ± 17.51 s and 152.88 ± 65.72 s, respectively. The groups did not differ for either test.

Conclusions: Differences between cognitive function tests results between patients with multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses were not statistically significant suggesting the lack of influence of the type of lens on visual perception at least in good light conditions. Further clinical trials using more sophisticate tests in different light conditions are needed.

Get Citation

Keywords

Multifocal intraocular lenses, cataract phacoemulsification, cognitive function, visual perception

About this article
Title

Cognitive functions in patieCognitive functions in patients after cataract phacoemulsification and implantation of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lnts after cataract phacoemulsification and implantation of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses

Journal

Medical Research Journal

Issue

Vol 3, No 2 (2018)

Article type

Original article

Pages

70-75

Published online

2018-07-31

Page views

700

Article views/downloads

798

DOI

10.5603/MRJ.2018.0012

Bibliographic record

Medical Research Journal 2018;3(2):70-75.

Keywords

Multifocal intraocular lenses
cataract phacoemulsification
cognitive function
visual perception

Authors

Martyna Gębska-Tołoczko
Jakub J. Kałużny
Agata Żaroń
Beata Danek
Joanna Pulkowska-Ulfig
Oliwia Beck
Milena Wojciechowska
Bartłomiej J. Kałużny

References (21)
  1. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(9): 1789–1798.
  2. Madrid-Costa D, Cerviño A, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al. Visual and optical performance with hybrid multifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2010; 93(6): 426–440.
  3. Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(9): CD003169.
  4. de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 12: CD003169.
  5. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Férnandez-Buenaga R, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017; 62(5): 611–634.
  6. Kamiya K, Hayashi K, Shimizu K, et al. Survey Working Group of the Japanese Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Multifocal intraocular lens explantation: a case series of 50 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158(2): 215–220.e1.
  7. Farid M, Chak G, Garg S, et al. Reduction in mean deviation values in automated perimetry in eyes with multifocal compared to monofocal intraocular lens implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158(2): 227–231.e1.
  8. Nuzzi R, Tridico F. Comparison of visual outcomes, spectacles dependence and patient satisfaction of multifocal and accommodative intraocular lenses: innovative perspectives for maximal refractive-oriented cataract surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1): 12.
  9. Chen T, Yu F, Lin H, et al. Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case-control observational study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100(11): 1530–1535.
  10. Peng C, Zhao J, Ma L, et al. Optical performance after bilateral implantation of apodized aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00-D addition power. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012; 90(8): e586–e593.
  11. Ji J, Huang X, Fan X, et al. Visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR compared with a monofocal intraocular lens following implantation in cataract surgery. Exp Ther Med. 2013; 5(1): 277–281.
  12. Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Moorfields IOL Study Group. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(12): 2449–2455.e1.
  13. Pepin SM. Neuroadaptation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008; 19(1): 10–12.
  14. Lubiński W, Podboraczyńska-Jodko K, Gronkowska-Serafin J, et al. Visual outcomes three and six months after implantation of diffractive and refractive multifocal IOL combinations. Klin Oczna. 2011; 113(7-9): 209–215.
  15. Lezak, MD., Howieson DB., Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford, Oxford University Press. ; 2004.
  16. Hebb DA. Podręcznik Psychologii (Psychology). Warsaw, PWN. ; 1969.
  17. Sánchez-Cubillo I, Periáñez JA, Adrover-Roig D, et al. Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009; 15(3): 438–450.
  18. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen OA. compedium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentator. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006:477-499. : 655–677.
  19. Lamberty GJ, Putnam SH, Chatel DM, et al. Derived Trail Making Test indices: A preliminary report. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology. 1994; 7(3): 230–234.
  20. Rosa AM, Miranda ÂC, Patrício M, et al. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess the Neurobehavioral Impact of Dysphotopsia with Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124(9): 1280–1289.
  21. Palomino Bautista C, Carmona González D, Castillo Gómez A, et al. Evolution of visual performance in 250 eyes implanted with the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal IOL. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19(5): 762–768.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl