open access

Vol 1, No 2 (2016)
Review article
Published online: 2016-12-02
Get Citation

Monoclonal gammopathy with renal significance

Martyna Sysakiewicz, Adriana Czyż, Marcin Ksieniewicz, Beata Sulikowska, Jarosław Czyż
·
Medical Research Journal 2016;1(2):53-57.

open access

Vol 1, No 2 (2016)
REVIEW ARTICLES
Published online: 2016-12-02

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) is a benign condition that carries a risk of progression to haematological malignancy. It is accepted that MGUS should not be treated until progression to multiple myeloma or another lymphoid malignancy. Recently, growing evidence has started to show that even small monoclonal clones can be responsible for renal impairment. Long-term observation of patients with monoclonal gammopathy and abnormal renal function showed that this condition can significantly affect renal and overall survival. Patients with monoclonal gammopathy with renal impairment have also higher risk of relapse after kidney transplantation. Among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance there is a group of defined monoclonal component-related diseases, which includes: light-chain amyloidosis, monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, crystal-storing histiocytosis, cryoglobulinaemias, and some others. They can be diagnosed on the base of clinical features and on histological examination. In patients with monoclonal protein and deposition of fragments or whole particle of monoclonal immunoglobulin with distinct localisation and substructural organisation can be found. The treatment strategy is targeting of B cell clones, which requires administration of chemotherapeutics or other medications that are used for the treatment of lymphoid malignancy or myeloma. The choice of therapeutic agent should take into account the current kidney status. Treatment of renal disease should not differ from other patients with similar conditions not related to monoclonal protein. The expert opinion is that the presence of monoclonal gammapathy is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation.  

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) is a benign condition that carries a risk of progression to haematological malignancy. It is accepted that MGUS should not be treated until progression to multiple myeloma or another lymphoid malignancy. Recently, growing evidence has started to show that even small monoclonal clones can be responsible for renal impairment. Long-term observation of patients with monoclonal gammopathy and abnormal renal function showed that this condition can significantly affect renal and overall survival. Patients with monoclonal gammopathy with renal impairment have also higher risk of relapse after kidney transplantation. Among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance there is a group of defined monoclonal component-related diseases, which includes: light-chain amyloidosis, monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, crystal-storing histiocytosis, cryoglobulinaemias, and some others. They can be diagnosed on the base of clinical features and on histological examination. In patients with monoclonal protein and deposition of fragments or whole particle of monoclonal immunoglobulin with distinct localisation and substructural organisation can be found. The treatment strategy is targeting of B cell clones, which requires administration of chemotherapeutics or other medications that are used for the treatment of lymphoid malignancy or myeloma. The choice of therapeutic agent should take into account the current kidney status. Treatment of renal disease should not differ from other patients with similar conditions not related to monoclonal protein. The expert opinion is that the presence of monoclonal gammapathy is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation.  

Get Citation

Keywords

monoclonal gammopathy, renal failure, treatment

About this article
Title

Monoclonal gammopathy with renal significance

Journal

Medical Research Journal

Issue

Vol 1, No 2 (2016)

Article type

Review article

Pages

53-57

Published online

2016-12-02

Page views

949

Article views/downloads

5265

DOI

10.5603/MRJ.2016.0009

Bibliographic record

Medical Research Journal 2016;1(2):53-57.

Keywords

monoclonal gammopathy
renal failure
treatment

Authors

Martyna Sysakiewicz
Adriana Czyż
Marcin Ksieniewicz
Beata Sulikowska
Jarosław Czyż

References (53)
  1. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003; 121(5): 749–757.
  2. Kyle RA, Durie BGM, Rajkumar SV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010; 24(6): 1121–1127.
  3. Bridoux F, Fermand JP. Optimizing treatment strategies in myeloma cast nephropathy: rationale for a randomized prospective trial. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012; 19(5): 333–341.
  4. Solomon A, Weiss DT, Kattine AA. Nephrotoxic potential of Bence Jones proteins. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(26): 1845–1851.
  5. Merlini G, Stone MJ. Dangerous small B-cell clones. Blood. 2006; 108(8): 2520–2530.
  6. Leung N, Bridoux F, Hutchison CA, et al. International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group. Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant. Blood. 2012; 120(22): 4292–4295.
  7. Pozzi C, D'Amico M, Fogazzi GB, et al. Light chain deposition disease with renal involvement: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42(6): 1154–1163.
  8. Heilman RL, Velosa JA, Holley KE, et al. Long-term follow-up and response to chemotherapy in patients with light-chain deposition disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1992; 20(1): 34–41.
  9. Leung N, Lager DJ, Gertz MA, et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in light-chain deposition disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43(1): 147–153.
  10. Lorenz EC, Sethi S, Leung N, et al. Recurrent membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2010; 77(8): 721–728.
  11. Touchard G. Ultrastructural pattern and classification of renal monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits. Monoclonal Gammopathies and the Kidney. 2003: 95–117.
  12. Ronco P, Aucouturier P, Mougenot B. Monoclonal gammopathies: multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, and related disorders. Diseases of the Kidney. 2001: 409–410.
  13. Vrana JA, Gamez JD, Madden BJ, et al. Classification of amyloidosis by laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis in clinical biopsy specimens. Blood. 2009; 114(24): 4957–4959.
  14. Lacy MQ, Gertz MA. Acquired Fanconi's syndrome associated with monoclonal gammopathies. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999; 13(6): 1273–1280.
  15. Paueksakon P, Revelo MP, Horn RG, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy: significance and possible causality in renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42(1): 87–95.
  16. Bridoux F, Leung N, Hutchison CA, et al. International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group, International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group. How I treat monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). Blood. 2013; 122(22): 3583–3590.
  17. Comenzo RL, Wally J, Kica G, et al. Clonal immunoglobulin light chain variable region germline gene use in AL amyloidosis: association with dominant amyloid-related organ involvement and survival after stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 1999; 106(3): 744–751.
  18. Merlini G, Wechalekar AD, Palladini G. Systemic light chain amyloidosis: an update for treating physicians. Blood. 2013; 121(26): 5124–5130.
  19. Obici L, Perfetti V, Palladini G, et al. Clinical aspects of systemic amyloid diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005; 1753(1): 11–22.
  20. Gertz MA, Comenzo R, Falk RH, et al. Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18-22 April 2004. Am J Hematol. 2005; 79(4): 319–328.
  21. Sayed RH, Wechalekar AD, Gilbertson JA, et al. Natural history and outcome of light chain deposition disease. Blood. 2015; 126(26): 2805–2810.
  22. Khamlichi AA, Rocca A, Touchard G, et al. Role of light chain variable region in myeloma with light chain deposition disease: evidence from an experimental model. Blood. 1995; 86(10): 3655–3659.
  23. Kaplan B, Vidal R, Kumar A, et al. Amino-terminal identity of co-existent amyloid and non-amyloid immunoglobulin kappa light chain deposits. A human disease to study alterations of protein conformation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1997; 110(3): 472–478.
  24. Néel A, Perrin F, Decaux O, et al. Long-term outcome of monoclonal (type 1) cryoglobulinemia. Am J Hematol. 2014; 89(2): 156–161.
  25. Karras A, Noël LH, Droz D, et al. Renal involvement in monoclonal (type I) cryoglobulinemia: two cases associated with IgG3 kappa cryoglobulin. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 40(5): 1091–1096.
  26. Stone MJ, McElroy YG, Pestronk A, et al. Human monoclonal macroglobulins with antibody activity. Semin Oncol. 2003; 30(2): 318–324.
  27. Ferri C, Sebastiani M, Giuggioli D, et al. Mixed cryoglobulinemia: demographic, clinical, and serologic features and survival in 231 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 33(6): 355–374.
  28. Nasr SH, Satoskar A, Markowitz GS, et al. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20(9): 2055–2064.
  29. Gertz M, Buadi FK. Case vignettes and other brain teasers of monoclonal gammopathies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012; 2012: 582–585.
  30. El Hamel C, Thierry A, Trouillas P, et al. Crystal-storing histiocytosis with renal Fanconi syndrome: pathological and molecular characteristics compared with classical myeloma-associated Fanconi syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25(9): 2982–2990.
  31. Carlson K, Hjorth M, Knudsen LM, et al. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Toxicity in standard melphalan-prednisone therapy among myeloma patients with renal failure--a retrospective analysis and recommendations for dose adjustment. Br J Haematol. 2005; 128(5): 631–635.
  32. Lichtman SM, Etcubanas E, Budman DR, et al. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fludarabine phosphate in patients with renal impairment: a prospective dose adjustment study. Cancer Invest. 2002; 20(7-8): 904–913.
  33. Ramasamy K, Hazel B, Mahmood S, et al. Bendamustine in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective therapy for myeloma patients with end stage renal disease. Br J Haematol. 2011; 155(5): 632–634.
  34. Pönisch W, Andrea M, Wagner I, et al. Successful treatment of patients with newly diagnosed/untreated multiple myeloma and advanced renal failure using bortezomib in combination with bendamustine and prednisone. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 138(8): 1405–1412.
  35. Jillella AP, Dainer PM, Kallab AM, et al. Treatment of a patient with end-stage renal disease with Rituximab: pharmacokinetic evaluation suggests Rituximab is not eliminated by hemodialysis. Am J Hematol. 2002; 71(3): 219–222.
  36. Vieira CA, Agarwal A, Book BK, et al. Rituximab for reduction of anti-HLA antibodies in patients awaiting renal transplantation: 1. Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Transplantation. 2004; 77(4): 542–548.
  37. Schrier RW, Parikh CR. Comparison of renal injury in myeloablative autologous, myeloablative allogeneic and non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 20(4): 678–683.
  38. Irazabal MV, Eirin A, Gertz MA, et al. Acute kidney injury during leukocyte engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with light-chain amyloidosis. Am J Hematol. 2012; 87(1): 51–54.
  39. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(9): 989–995.
  40. Venner CP, Lane T, Foard D, et al. Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone therapy in AL amyloidosis is associated with high clonal response rates and prolonged progression-free survival. Blood. 2012; 119(19): 4387–4390.
  41. Mikhael JR, Schuster SR, Jimenez-Zepeda VH, et al. Cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) produces rapid and complete hematologic response in patients with AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2012; 119(19): 4391–4394.
  42. Venner CP, Gillmore JD, Sachchithanantham S, et al. A matched comparison of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) versus risk-adapted cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) in AL amyloidosis. Leukemia. 2014; 28(12): 2304–2310.
  43. Cibeira MT, Sanchorawala V, Seldin DC, et al. Outcome of AL amyloidosis after high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation: long-term results in a series of 421 patients. Blood. 2011; 118(16): 4346–4352.
  44. D'Souza A, Dispenzieri A, Wirk B, et al. Improved Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Light Chain Amyloidosis: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(32): 3741–3749.
  45. Richards DB, Cookson LM, Berges AC, et al. Therapeutic Clearance of Amyloid by Antibodies to Serum Amyloid P Component. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(12): 1106–1114.
  46. Weichman K, Dember LM, Prokaeva T, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with non-amyloid light chain deposition disorders, and outcome following treatment with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 38(5): 339–343.
  47. Lorenz EC, Gertz MA, Fervenza FC, et al. Long-term outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation in light chain deposition disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008; 23(6): 2052–2057.
  48. Kastritis E, Migkou M, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Treatment of light chain deposition disease with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Haematologica. 2009; 94(2): 300–302.
  49. Ramos-Casals M, Stone JH, Cid MC, et al. The cryoglobulinaemias. Lancet. 2012; 379(9813): 348–360.
  50. Terrier B, Krastinova E, Marie I, et al. Management of noninfectious mixed cryoglobulinemia vasculitis: data from 242 cases included in the CryoVas survey. Blood. 2012; 119(25): 5996–6004.
  51. Dammacco F, Tucci FA, Lauletta G, et al. Pegylated interferon-alpha, ribavirin, and rituximab combined therapy of hepatitis C virus-related mixed cryoglobulinemia: a long-term study. Blood. 2010; 116(3): 343–353.
  52. Palladini G, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, et al. New criteria for response to treatment in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis based on free light chain measurement and cardiac biomarkers: impact on survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(36): 4541–4549.
  53. Durie BGM, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International Myeloma Working Group. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006; 20(9): 1467–1473.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl