Vol 81, No 5 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-03-29

open access

Page views 1882
Article views/downloads 466
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Clinical vignette

Concomitant high-risk pulmonary embolism and paradoxical ischemic stroke: Aspiration thrombectomy as a treatment option

André Alexandre12*David Sá-Couto12*Andreia Campinas1Mariana Santos1Raquel Baggen-Santos12Bruno Brochado12João Silveira12Severo Torres12André Luz1–3
1Department of Cardiology, Porto University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
2ICBAS — School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
3Cardiovascular Research Group, UMIB — Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS — School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
*Both authors equally contributed to the study

Correspondence to:

André Alexandre, MD,

Department of Cardiology, Porto University Hospital Center,

Largo do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099–001, Porto, Portugal,

phone: +351 22 207 7500,

e-mail: andrealexandre_1@msn.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0081

Received: January 29, 2023

Accepted: February 25, 2023

Early publication date: March 29, 2023

A 31-year-old man, with a history of steroid-dependent Crohn’s disease and paraparesis, experienced simultaneous pulmonary embolism (PE) and paradoxical ischemic stroke. This patient was admitted to the emergency department with sudden dyspnea and chest discomfort. Initial examination revealed that the patient was hemodynamically stable but with severe (type 1) respiratory failure and hypocapnia. His electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia (166/minute) and slight ST-segment depression in the left precordial leads. Bedside transthoracic echocardiography revealed pulmonary artery acceleration time of 83 msec, moderate tricuspid regurgitation with estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 35 mm Hg, mild right ventricular dilation with preserved systolic function, no signs of short axis pressure overload, non-dilated inferior vena cava with normal inspiratory collapse, and preserved left ventricular function. Cardiac biomarkers were elevated (high-sensitivity troponin T was 0.147 ng/ml [reference values 0.0000.014] and NT-pro-BNP was 2275 pg/ml [reference value <300]). Considering the clinical presentation of acute respiratory failure in the patient with prolonged immobilization, we assumed there was a high clinical probability of PE, and anticoagulation with enoxaparin was initiated without delay. Pulmonary computed tomography (CT) angiography further confirmed bilateral PE with a subocclusive thrombus in the right pulmonary artery and segmental thrombi in the left branches with filling defects (Supplementary material, Figure S1).

One hour after admission, the patient suddenly developed focal neurological deficits. An urgent CT angiography of the cerebral arteries revealed an endoluminal thrombus occluding the proximal M1 and M2 segments of the right middle cerebral artery. Due to anticoagulation used initially for PE treatment, tissue plasminogen activator was not used for management of stroke, and thrombectomy of the right middle cerebral artery was performed with neurological improvement (Supplementary material, Figure S2, Videos S1, S2). At first, a conservative PE treatment with anticoagulation was favored since the patient was hemodynamically stable (intermediate-high risk PE). Nevertheless, the patient evolved with shock and transthoracic echocardiography showed progressive signs of right heart chambers overload: dilated right ventricle (44 mm) with signs of short axis pressure overload, pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 52 mm Hg, hypokinesia of the right ventricular mid-free wall, and dilated inferior vena cava (22 mm) with normal respiratory variability. Considering the catastrophic progression to high-risk PE and the formal contraindication to systemic thrombolysis (concomitant ischemic stroke), we decided to proceed with pulmonary aspiration thrombectomy. Pulmonary thrombectomy was successfully performed with the Indigo aspiration system (Indigo CAT 8Fr XTORQ) (Figure 1, Supplementary material, Videos S3S11). During the procedure, mean pulmonary artery pressure dropped from 37 mm Hg to 25 mm Hg, improving lung perfusion and resolving the obstructive shock (catecholamine support was stopped within the following hour).

Figure 1. Pulmonary aspiration thrombectomy for management of concomitant high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and paradoxical stroke. A. Pulmonary angiography showing total occlusion (black arrow) of the right pulmonary artery (white arrow). B. Pulmonary angiography revealing segmental occlusion (black arrow) of the left pulmonary artery (white arrow) and filling defects of its branches. CF. Pulmonary angiography showing the final result with improved lung perfusion after aspiration thrombectomy

This clinical case illustrates the catastrophic possibility of synchronous high-risk PE and ischemic stroke due to an intracardiac shunt (a bubble study further revealed the presence of a patent foramen ovale in this patient) [1]. Concomitant presentation of massive PE and paradoxical ischemic stroke is considered a “double jeopardy” since the risk of brain hemorrhage contraindicates systemic thrombolysis for combined high-risk PE [2]. Currently, there is no agreed-upon standard treatment in this situation [2]. Since systemic thrombolysis leads to a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications, percutaneous catheter-directed strategies (such as pulmonary aspiration thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis) are emerging as potential alternatives [3–5]. In this case, pulmonary aspiration thrombectomy turned out to be a reliable and safe treatment option for patients who experience concomitant high-risk PE and ischemic stroke.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Le Moigne E, Timsit S, Ben Salem D, et al. Patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke in patients with pulmonary embolism: A prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(11): 756763, doi: 10.7326/M18-3485, indexed in Pubmed: 31060047.
  2. Lio KaU, Jiménez D, Moores L, et al. Clinical conundrum: concomitant high-risk pulmonary embolism and acute ischemic stroke. Emerg Radiol. 2020; 27(4): 433439, doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01772-7, indexed in Pubmed: 32211984.
  3. Ciampi-Dopazo JJ, Romeu-Prieto JM, Sánchez-Casado M, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy for treatment of acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: Initial single-center prospective experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29(1): 101106, doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.010, indexed in Pubmed: 29102272.
  4. Sista AK, Horowitz JM, Tapson VF, et al. Indigo Aspiration System for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the EXTRACT-PE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(3): 319329, doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.053, indexed in Pubmed: 33454291.
  5. Toma C, Bunte M, Cho K, et al. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in a real‐world pulmonary embolism population: Interim results of the FLASH registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022; 99(4): 13451355, doi: 10.1002/ccd.30091, indexed in Pubmed: 35114059.