Vol 81, No 4 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-02-17

open access

Page views 2694
Article views/downloads 785
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Left anterior descending artery injury during routine dual-chamber pacemaker implantation leading to myocardial infarction

Piotr Denysiuk1, Erwin Ciechański12, Tomasz Klecha1, Adrianna Denysiuk3, Gerard Grossmann1, Marcin Szczasny1, Piotr Błaszczak1
Pubmed: 36800484
Kardiol Pol 2023;81(4):412-413.

Abstract

Not available

Clinical vignette

Left anterior descending artery injury during routine dual-chamber pacemaker implantation leading to myocardial infarction

Piotr Denysiuk1Erwin Ciechański12Tomasz Klecha1Adrianna Denysiuk3Gerard Grossmann1Marcin Szczasny1Piotr Błaszczak1
1Department of Cardiology, Stefan Cardinal Wyszynski Province Specialist Hospital, Lublin, Poland
2Department of Toxicology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
3Voivodeship Center of Occupational Medicine Prevention and Treatment Center in Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Correspondence to:

Piotr Denysiuk, MD,

Department of Cardiology,

Stefan Cardinal Wyszynski Regional Specialist Hospital,

Kraśnicka 100, 20–718 Lublin, Poland,

phone: +48 79 146 05 07,

e-mail: piotr.denysiuk@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0049

Received: December 4, 2022

Accepted: February 5, 2023

Early publication date: February 17, 2023

A 73-year-old male was admitted to the Cardiology Ward from the Emergency Department after an episode of syncope for further evaluation and treatment. The patient had a history of hypertension and recurrent presyncope episodes. On admission, he was in stable condition with no significant findings on physical examination. Electrocardiography (ECG) recorded after the syncope showed sinus bradycardia with junctional escape rhythm and a heart rate of 38 beats per minute. There were no other significant findings on 24-hour Holter monitoring. The patient was diagnosed with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction and scheduled for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation the next day. The procedure was carried out routinely with a 52 cm right atrial lead placed in the right atrial appendage with a capture threshold of 1 V at 0.4 ms, sensing at 3 mV, and impedance of 628 Ω, and a 58 cm ventricular lead placed in the right ventricular outflow tract with a capture threshold of 0.5 V at 0.4 ms, sensing at >12 mV and impedance of 640 Ω. Lead placement was confirmed with two independent fluoroscopy angles. Within minutes after placement of the ventricular lead, the patient developed chest pain and became hypotensive with a sudden drop in blood pressure to 60/30 mm Hg. Pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade were ruled out using fluoroscopy in 30° left anterior oblique view and intraprocedural transthoracic echocardiography. The patient’s status quickly improved after administration of inotropes and intravenous fluids and the symptoms subsided; the procedure was completed without further complications. After obtaining a post-procedure 12-lead ECG, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was confirmed (Figure 1A). Emergency coronary angiography showed critical stenosis of the left anterior descending artery with compromised distal flow, of the diagonal branch, and significant stenosis of the circumflex artery. Angioplasty of the left anterior descending artery and the diagonal branch was performed using two drug-eluting stents; the patient was scheduled for elective circumflex artery angioplasty before discharge.

Figure 1. A. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in bipolar paced evolutions fulfilling Sgarbossa Criteria concordant ST-segment elevation >1 mm in lead V5, discordant ST-segment elevation >5 mm in leads V2V4. Atypical QRS morphology suggesting possible epicardial pacing. B. Coronary angiography revealing left anterior descending artery perforation by the ventricular lead helix with TIMI grade 1 flow beyond the injury point, RAO 19°, CRA 35° view. C. LAO 33°, CRA 25° view. D. Control angiography after coronary stenting RAO 15°, CRA 36° view
Abbreviations: CRA, cranial angle; LAO, left anterior oblique; RAO, right anterior oblique

Due to the complicated pacemaker implantation course and the ECG suggesting epicardial pacing, suspicion of direct injury to the coronary artery was raised. After careful re-evaluation of coronary angiography, a direct left anterior descending artery perforation by the ventricular lead helix was confirmed (Figure 1B, D; Supplementary material, Video S1S3). The lead was replaced without further complications, and scheduled angioplasty was carried out as planned. No significant pericardial effusion was present on control echocardiography following the procedure. After follow-up, the patient was discharged home.

Myocardial infarction due to coronary artery injury is a rare complication of cardiac electronic device implantation [1]. There were only several recorded cases of left anterior descending artery injury caused by a ventricular lead [2–5]. In the presented case, the patient developed symptoms of acute myocardial infarction due to inadvertent malposition of the ventricular lead in the right ventricle anteroseptal junction leading to coronary artery perforation by the lead helix, and he required urgent revascularization and lead replacement. Routine use of 12-lead ECG and right anterior oblique (RAO) imaging during implantation should be considered to avoid this high-risk pseudo-septal position and potential complications. Utilization of novel imaging algorithms such as iterative metal artifact reduction for computed tomography might be helpful for better evaluation of the perforated leads [6].

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Pang BJ, Barold SS, Mond HG. Injury to the coronary arteries and related structures by implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2015; 17(4): 524529, doi: 10.1093/europace/euu345, indexed in Pubmed: 25564549.
  2. Parwani AS, Rolf S, Haverkamp W. Coronary artery occlusion due to lead insertion into the right ventricular outflow tract. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30(4): 425, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn487, indexed in Pubmed: 18987097.
  3. Nishiyama N, Takatsuki S, Kimura T, et al. Implantation of the right ventricular lead of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator complicated by apical myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012; 126(10): 13141315, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097527, indexed in Pubmed: 22949541.
  4. Karalis I, Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ. Obstruction of distal left anterior descending artery by the right ventricular lead of an implantable cardiac defibrillator. Neth Heart J. 2014; 22(6): 309, doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0272-z, indexed in Pubmed: 22592562.
  5. Hayase J, Shapiro H, Bae D, et al. Dual chamber pacemaker implantation complicated by left anterior descending coronary artery injury. JACC Case Rep. 2019; 1(4): 633637, doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.10.001, indexed in Pubmed: 34316895.
  6. Młynarski R, Sosna M, Honkowicz M, et al. Usefulness of metal artifact reduction algorithms from pacemaker lead in diagnostic of late perforation: The right choice makes it easier to make a decision. Kardiol Pol. 2023; 81(3): 310311, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0014, indexed in Pubmed: 36640017.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)