open access
Usefulness of metal artifact reduction algorithms from pacemaker lead in diagnostic of late perforation: The right choice makes it easier to make a decision
Affiliations- Department of Electroradiology, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Electrocardiology Department, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Radiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Radiodiagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinical Center prof. K. Gibinski of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
open access
Abstract
Abstract
About this articleTitle
Usefulness of metal artifact reduction algorithms from pacemaker lead in diagnostic of late perforation: The right choice makes it easier to make a decision
Journal
Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal)
Issue
Article type
Clinical vignette
Published online
2023-01-10
Page views
43
Article views/downloads
35
DOI
10.33963/KP.a2023.0014
Pubmed
Authors
Rafał Młynarski
Michał Sosna
Maciej Honkowicz
Michał Gibiński
Karolina Simionescu
Michał Rozmus
Krzysztof S Golba
References (5)- Waddingham PH, Elliott J, Bates A, et al. Iatrogenic cardiac perforation due to pacemaker and defibrillator leads: a contemporary multicentre experience. Europace. 2022; 24(11): 1824–1833.
- Vanezis AP, Prasad R, Andrews R. Pacemaker leads and cardiac perforation. JRSM Open. 2017; 8(3): 2054270416681432.
- Jiang Z, Chen Y, Chen C, et al. Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in very elderly patients (≥80 years). Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(4): 452–460.
- Martin O, Boos J, Aissa J, et al. Impact of different iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) algorithms on PET/CT attenuation correction after port implementation. Eur J Radiol. 2020; 129: 109065.
- Bolstad K, Flatabø S, Aadnevik D, et al. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants. Acta Radiol. 2018; 59(9): 1110–1118.
