Clinical vignette

Effectiveness of atrioventricular synchrony in a patient with Micra AV after the first implantation in Central Eastern Europe

Agnieszka Katarzyńska-Szymańska1Lidia Chmielewska-Michalak1Maciej Grymuza1Aleksandra Ciepłucha1Oskar Kowalski2Przemysław Mitkowski1
11st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
2Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease and Electrotherapy, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland

Correspondence to:

Agnieszka Katarzyńska-Szymańska, MD, PhD,

1st Department of Cardiology,

Poznan University of Medical Sciences,

Dluga 1/2, 61–848 Poznań, Poland,

phone: +48 618 549 146,


Copyright by the Author(s), 2022

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0231

Received: August 31, 2022

Accepted: September 5, 2022

Early publication date: October 2, 2022

A 95-year-old female was admitted to the cardiology ward due to lead-dependent infective endocarditis with concomitant pocket infection. Her previous medical records included dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in 2007 due to the atrioventricular second-degree block and subsequent reimplantation in 2019 (the first due to battery depletion and the second due to the system malfunction after a direct trauma). During hospitalization, she underwent targeted antibiotic therapy with subsequent transvenous lead extraction and, following the expert recommendations, she was qualified for a Micra atrioventricular (Micra AV) implantation as the therapy of choice [1].

The implantation of the Micra AV synchronous ventricular leadless pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, US) took place on May 29, 2020 (Supplementary data). We confirmed the active fixation of the three lines before the withdrawal of the delivery system. Basic electrical parameters from device interrogation are summarized in Supplementary material, Video S1, Table 1. Manual optimization of P-wave detection before discharge from the hospital significantly increased detection of atrial mechanical contraction and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (AsVP) from 47.7% to 92.6%. It must be emphasized that during the ambulatory control we repeatedly reprogrammed pacemaker settings to optimize AsVP. Above all programmable variables the shortening of the A3 window end and increasing atrial sensitivity allowed us to achieve AsVP of 86.1% and 68% during 12 and 24 months of follow-up (FU), respectively (Table 1). We considered this a satisfactory result although the results of the Marvel 2 Study were more promising and described an average AsVP of 89.2%. However, our data are in line with real-life reports from other centers [2].

Table 1. Summary of basic electrical parameters as well as percentages of various pacing events



1 M FU

12 M FU

18 M FU

24 M FU

QRS amplitude, mV







Impedance, Om







Threshold, V/0.24 ms







AM-Vs, %






Vs, %






AM-Vp, %






Vp, %






Originally, the MICRA leadless pacemaker was limited to ventricular pacing in the context of permanent atrial fibrillation [3]. The main advantages of such a pacing system are minimally invasive procedure, short impulse duration with prolonged battery life, and reduced incidence of complications, including device-related infections. The Micra AV system, in turn, is dedicated to patients with high-grade atrioventricular block and preserved sinus rhythm, in whom the risk of complications of endocardial dual-chamber pacemaker is significantly increased [3]. It maintains AV synchrony at rest, increases stroke volume, and reduces the probability of pacemaker syndrome occurrence. The Micra AV algorithm is based on the accelerometer’s ability to detect mechanical changes during cardiac cycles [4]. The accelerometer signal expresses four segments of cardiac activity. The mechanical signals of blood flow from the accelerometer, as well as the surface electrocardiogram, are shown and described in Supplementary material, Figure S1. Proper sensing of atrial mechanical activity is crucial for synchronized ventricular pacing; hence it is important to perform programming of the atrial sensing predischarge in outpatient settings. As suggested by other authors, successful atrial synchronous ventricular (VDD mode) pacing is more likely to occur in sedentary patients with lower heart rates, preserved contractile atrial function, and proper repetitive reprogramming of the device [4, 5].

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at

Article information

Conflict of interest: PM declares support from Medtronic Company. Other authors declare no conflict of interest concerning the article.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non- Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at


  1. Kempa M, Mitkowski P, Kowalski O, et al. Expert opinion of a Working Group on Leadless Pacing appointed by the National Consultant in Cardiology and the Board of the Heart Rhythm Section of the Polish Cardiac Society. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(5): 604608, doi: 10.33963/KP.15982, indexed in Pubmed: 34125944.
  2. Kowlgi GN, Tseng AS, Tempel ND, et al. A real-world experience of atrioventricular synchronous pacing with leadless ventricular pacemakers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33(5): 982993, doi: 10.1111/jce.15430, indexed in Pubmed: 35233867.
  3. Glikson M, Nielsen J, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(35): 34273520, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364, indexed in Pubmed: 34455430.
  4. Chinitz L, Ritter P, Khelae SK, et al. Accelerometer-based atrioventricular synchronous pacing with a ventricular leadless pacemaker: Results from the Micra atrioventricular feasibility studies. Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15(9): 13631371, doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.004, indexed in Pubmed: 29758405.
  5. Garweg C, Khelae SK, Steinwender C, et al. Predictors of atrial mechanical sensing and atrioventricular synchrony with a leadless ventricular pacemaker: Results from the MARVEL 2 Study. Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17(12): 20372045, doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.024, indexed in Pubmed: 32717315.


Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73 , 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

phone:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: