Vol 80, No 2 (2022)
Review paper
Published online: 2022-02-14

open access

Page views 7121
Article views/downloads 2866
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Optimal anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: Which drug at which dose?

Jo-Nan Liao12, Yi-Hsin Chan345, Ling Kuo12, Chuan-Tsai Tsai12, Su-Shen Lim12, Tze-Fan Chao12
Pubmed: 35167115
Kardiol Pol 2022;80(2):128-136.

Abstract

Aging is an important risk factor for adverse events in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and complicates the management of anticoagulation. Underuse of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is  common in elderly patients because of comorbidities, the altered physiological function of multiple organs, frailty, risk of falls, and the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically for elderly patients. Nevertheless, current data still support OACs use for reducing ischemic stroke with positive net clinical benefits. Sub-analyses of RCTs and real-world cohort studies showed that non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) would be more favorable choices compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in the elderly. This review will discuss important data on stroke prevention and the use of NOACs in elderly AF patients.

References

  1. Lip GYH, Kakar P, Watson T. Atrial fibrillation — the growing epidemic. Heart. 2007; 93(5): 542–543.
  2. Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ, et al. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11(11): 639–654.
  3. Chao TF, Joung B, Takahashi Y, et al. 2021 Focused update of the 2017 consensus guidelines of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Arrhythm. 2021; 37(6): 1389–1426.
  4. Chao TF, Joung B, Takahashi Y, et al. 2021 Focused Update Consensus Guidelines of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary. Thromb Haemost. 2022; 122(1): 20–47.
  5. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019; 140(2): e125–e151.
  6. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(40): 4194.
  7. Chao TF, Wang KL, Liu CJ, et al. Age threshold for increased stroke risk among patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study from Taiwan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(12): 1339–1347.
  8. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010; 138(5): 1093–1100.
  9. Esteve-Pastor MA, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Roldan V, et al. Long-term bleeding risk prediction in 'real world' patients with atrial fibrillation: Comparison of the HAS-BLED and ABC-Bleeding risk scores. The Murcia Atrial Fibrillation Project. Thromb Haemost. 2017; 117(10): 1848–1858.
  10. Chao TF, Chiang CE, Liao JN, et al. Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Elderly Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Chest. 2020; 157(5): 1266–1277.
  11. Patti G, Lucerna M, Pecen L, et al. Thromboembolic Risk, Bleeding Outcomes and Effect of Different Antithrombotic Strategies in Very Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Sub‐Analysis From the PREFER in AF ( PRE vention o F Thromboembolic Events– E uropean R egistry in A trial F ibrillation). J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(7).
  12. Kodani E, Atarashi H, Inoue H, et al. J-RHYTHM Registry Investigators, J-RHYTHM Registry Investigators. Use of warfarin in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation -- subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry. Circ J. 2015; 79(11): 2345–2352.
  13. Krittayaphong R, Boonyapiphat T, Wongvipaporn C, et al. Age-Related Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the COOL-AF Registry. Clin Interv Aging. 2021; 16: 707–719.
  14. Russo V, Carbone A, Rago A, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: it is never too late. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2019; 73(4): 207–214.
  15. Chao TF, Liu CJ, Lin YJ, et al. Validation of a Modified CHA2DS2-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Stratification in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Stroke. 2016; 47(10): 2462–2469.
  16. Chao TF, Chiang CE, Chan YH, et al. Oral anticoagulants in extremely-high-risk, very elderly (>90 years) patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2021; 18(6): 871–877.
  17. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(12): 1139–1151.
  18. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(10): 883–891.
  19. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(11): 981–992.
  20. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(22): 2093–2104.
  21. Kim IS, Kim HJ, Kim TH, et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiol. 2018; 72(2): 105–112.
  22. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2011; 123(21): 2363–2372.
  23. Kato ET, Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(5).
  24. Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(28): 1864–1872.
  25. Goodman SG, Wojdyla DM, Piccini JP, et al. Factors associated with major bleeding events: insights from the ROCKET AF trial (rivaroxaban once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(9): 891–900.
  26. Lai CL, Chen HM, Liao MT, et al. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in the oldest adults with atrial fibrillation in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66(8): 1567–1574.
  27. Tsai CT, Liao JN, Chen SJ, et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in AF patients ≥ 85 years. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021; 51(6): e13488.
  28. Chan YH, Lee HF, See LC, et al. Effectiveness and safety of four direct oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2019; 156(3): 529–543.
  29. Hanon O, Vidal JS, Pisica-Donose G, et al. Bleeding risk with rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists in patients aged 80 years or older with atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2021; 107(17): 1376–1382.
  30. Deitelzweig S, Keshishian A, Li X, et al. Comparisons between oral anticoagulants among older nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67(8): 1662–1671.
  31. Russo V, Attena E, Di Maio M, et al. Clinical profile of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: a multicentre propensity score matched real-world cohort study. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020; 49(1): 42–53.
  32. Hanon O, Jeandel C, Jouanny P, et al. Anticoagulant treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: position paper. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2019; 17(4): 341–355.
  33. Cheng WH, Chiang CE, Lin YJ, et al. Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly (≥85 years) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: Changing Clinical Practice and Outcomes for Stroke Prevention in a Nationwide Cohort Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021; 96(1): 52–65.
  34. Chan YH, Chao TF, Lee HF, et al. Impacts of different renal function estimation formulas on dosing of DOACs and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(15): 1808–1810.
  35. Chan YH, Chao TF, Lee HF, et al. Different renal function equations and dosing of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation. JACC: Asia. 2022.
  36. Schäfer A, Flierl U, Berliner D, et al. Anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020; 34(4): 555–568.
  37. Patti G, Cavallari I, Hanon O, et al. The safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation in the elderly. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 265: 118–124.
  38. Okumura K, Akao M, Yoshida T, et al. Low-Dose Edoxaban in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(18): 1735–1745.
  39. Chao TF, Chan YH, Chiang CE, et al. Stroke prevention with direct oral anticoagulants in high risk elderly atrial fibrillation patients at increased bleeding risk. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 [Epub ahead of print].
  40. Hiasa KI, Kaku H, Inoue H, et al. Age-Related Differences in the Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Japan - Insight From the ANAFIE (All Nippon AF In Elderly) Registry. Circ J. 2020; 84(3): 388–396.
  41. Khan F, Huang H, Datta YH. Direct oral anticoagulant use and the incidence of bleeding in the very elderly with atrial fibrillation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016; 42(4): 573–578.
  42. Andreotti F, Rocca B, Husted S, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in the elderly: expert position paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(46): 3238–3249.
  43. Hylek EM, D'Antonio J, Evans-Molina C, et al. Translating the results of randomized trials into clinical practice: the challenge of warfarin candidacy among hospitalized elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2006; 37(4): 1075–1080.
  44. Rao MP, Vinereanu D, Wojdyla DM, et al. Clinical outcomes and history of fall in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial. Am J Med. 2018; 131(3): 269–275.e2.
  45. Steffel J, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients at risk of falling: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(11): 1169–1178.
  46. Wilkinson C, Todd O, Clegg A, et al. Management of atrial fibrillation for older people with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2019; 48(2): 196–203.
  47. LaFromboise TD. American Indian mental health policy. Am Psychol. 1988; 43(5): 388–397.
  48. Gellad WF, Grenard JL, Marcum ZA. A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011; 9(1): 11–23.
  49. Wimmer BC, Cross AJ, Jokanovic N, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with medication regimen complexity in older people: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65(4): 747–753.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)