Vol 80, No 2 (2022)
Short communication
Published online: 2021-12-31

open access

Page views 5444
Article views/downloads 590
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

_16_HTML__KP_02_2022__Kuczaj
  • „ Short communication

COVID-19 mortality in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation: A single-center one-year observational study

Agnieszka Kuczaj1, 2, Michał Zakliczyński3, Piotr Przybyłowski1, 2, Michał Zembala2, Tomasz Hrapkowicz1, 2

1Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland

2Department of Cardiac Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland

3Department of Cardiac Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland

Correspondence to:

Agnieszka Kuczaj, MD, PhD,

Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology,

Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia,

M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 9, 41–800 Zabrze, Poland,

phone: +48 606 681 175,

e-mail: agnieszka.kuczaj@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2022

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2021.0196

Received: November 20, 2021

Accepted: December 29, 2021

Early publication date: December 31, 2021

INTRODUCTION

Reports on transplant patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 suggest that not only the immunosuppressive regimen but also comorbidities and advanced age influence the clinical course of the infection [1]. Based on the available case series, reports, and meta-analyses, the COVID-19 mortality rate in solid organ transplant patients is higher than in the general population. We aimed to assess COVID-19 mortality and morbidity in heart transplant (HTx) recipients who were under the surveillance of one Po­lish center.

METHODS

This was a one-year prospective clinical observational study from a single transplant center regarding susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Patients were analyzed from March 2020 to March 2021. The data were collected during hospitalization, home medical visits, phone calls, and from the open database of the National Health Fund. All patients signed written informed consent to participate in the study.

The patients were considered infected if they had positive results of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests of nasopharyngeal swab samples or a history of typical signs and symptoms of COVID-19 with the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

The whole group of patients comprised 540 patients after HTx (112 patients ≤1 year and 428 patients >1 year after HTx), and among them there were 50 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, including 10 patients ≤1 year after HTx.

Forty patients (80%) received tacrolimus, including 12 patients (24%) on monotherapy, 27 patients (54%) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, and one patient (5%) in combination with everolimus. Eight patients (16%) received cyclosporine A, including 6 subjects (12%) who received cyclosporine A in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and 2 subjects (10%) took it in monotherapy. One patient received everolimus with mycophenolate mofetil, and another patient was given sirolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.

Patients up to one year after transplantation were administered prednisone as the basic regimen in tapered doses. All patients were given statins and acetylsalicylic acid (75 mg/day).

As antiviral and antibacterial prophylaxis, all patients were administered valganciclovir up to day 110 and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim up to 6 months after transplantation.

Table 1 shows clinical and laboratory parameters.

Table 1. Clinical patient characteristics

Whole group (n = 50)

Survivors (n = 44)

Deceased (n = 6)

P-value

Age, years, mean (SD)

57.1 (12.2)

56.5 (12)

61.32 (13.5)

0.405

Female sex, n (%)

10 (20)

9 (20.5)

1 (16.7)

0.91

Time from HTx to infection, years, median (IQR)

7.01 (0.38–12.5)

7.43 (2.12–26.4)

3.93 (0.38–12.25)

0.51

Infection-to-death time, days, median (IQR)

38.0 (2847)

NA

38.0 (28–47)

NA

Patients hospitalized for COVID-19, n (%)

14 (28)

8 (18.2)

6 (100)

<0.001

Hospitalization for COVID-19, days, mean (SD)

21.3 (10.94)

20.75 (10.63)

25.33 (15.19)

0.517

Hypertension, n (%)

40 (80)

36 (81.8)

4 (66.7)

0.3

Bodyweight, kg, mean (SD)

81.45 (14.3)

81.18 (13.9)

83.47 (15.71)

0.71

Height, cm, mean (SD)

173.18 (7.57)

173.9 (7.81)

172.33 (5.47)

0.71

BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)

26.94 (4.07)

26.77 (3.81)

28.15 (5.61)

0.44

Active cancer, n (%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

NA

Previous cancer, n (%)

3 (6)

3 (6.8)

0 (0)

0.499

Previous TIA, n (%)

2 (4)

2 (4.5)

0 (0)

0.585

Previous stroke, n (%)

6 (12)

6 (13.6)

0 (0)

0.322

Impaired glucose metabolism

0.454

None, n (%)

17 (34)

14 (31.8)

3 (50)

Glucose intolerance, n (%)

8 (16)

8 (18.2)

0 (0)

Diabetes, n (%)

24 (48)

21 (47.7)

3 (50)

COPD, n (%)

3 (6)

2 (4.5)

1 (16.7)

0.26

Graft vasculopathy, n (%)

9 (18)

8 (18.2)

1 (16.7)

0.9

Previous PTCA, n (%)

6 (12)

5 (11.4)

1 (16.7)

0.74

Chronic renal failure, n (%)

36 (72)

30 (68.2)

6 (100)

0.116

Chronic dialysis, n (%)

6 (12)

3 (6.8)

3 (50)

0.02

Dialyses in the course of COVID-19, n (%)

7 (14)

3 (6.8)

4 (66.7)

<0.001

NYHA I, n (%)

44

41 (93.2)

3 (50)

0.008

NYHA II, n (%)

4

3 (6.8)

1 (16.7)

NYHA III, n (%)

1

0 (0)

1 (16.7)

NYHA IV, n (%)

1

0 (0)

1 (16.7)

LVEF, % (median, IQR)

55.9 (45–60)

56 (55–60)

55 (45–58)

0.31

Leukocyte count before the SARS-CoV-2 infection, ×109/l, median (IQR)

6.74 (5.6–10.12)

6.57 (5.6–7.84)

7.96 (5.95–10.12)

0.261

Leukocyte count after the SARS-CoV-2 infection, ×109/l, mean (SD)

6.29 (1.92)

6.33 (1.8)

5.99 (2.64)

0.737

Lymphocyte count before the SARS-CoV-2 infection, ×103/µl, median (IQR)

1.37 (0.27–1.93)

1.49 (1.12–1.93)

0.46 (0.27–0.65)

0.063

Creatinine level before the SARS-CoV-2 infection, µmol/l, median (IQR)

129.7 (95.47–354)

120.5 (95.47–156)

197.5 (164–354)

0.014

Creatinine after the SARS-CoV-2 infection, µmol/l, median (IQR)

121.6 (87.0–244.5)

114.0 (87.0–144)

177.5 (109–244.5)

0.256

Acute cellular rejection treatment one year before the SARS--CoV-2 infection, n (%)

6 (12)

6 (13.6)

0 (0)

0.31

Peripheral vascular disease, n (%)

6 (12)

4 (9.1)

2 (33.3)

0.099

Therapy with the lymphocyte depleting agent 6 months before the SARS-CoV-2 infection

None

None

None

NA

Bacterial or viral infection requiring hospitalization or during hospitalization for other reasons one year before the SARS-CoV-2 infection, n (%)

6 (12)

4 (9.1)

2 (33.3)

0.099

Past CMV infection, n (%)

7 (14)

6 (13.6)

1 (16.7)

0.86

Active CMV infection, n (%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

NA

Past HBV infection, n (%)

3 (6)

3 (6.8)

0 (0)

0.504

Past HCV infection, n (%)

2 (4)

2 (4.5)

0 (0)

0.58

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CMV, cytomegalovirus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HBV, hepatitis B; HCV, hepatitis C; IQR, interquartile range; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NA, not applicable; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OHT, orthotopic heart transplantation; PTCA, percutaneous coronary angio­plasty; SD, standard deviation; TIA, transient ischemic attack

The Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia approved the study (decision no. PCN/CMN/0022/KB1/30/21).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as the mean and standard deviation for normally distributed data or median with lower and upper quartiles. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normal distribution of data. The Chi2 test was utilized to compare categorical variables, whereas the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare continuous variables where appropriate. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Gary, NC, US) was used for all calculations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The whole population of patients with COVID-19 included 50 patients (9.23% of all patients). Clinical patient characteristics are given in Table 1.

Patients within the first year after HTx (n = 10) comprised 20% of COVID-19 subjects. The percentage of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients within the first year after HTx was 8.9% (10/112), and 9.3% (40/428) after the first year following HTx. The death rate was 30% (3/10) within the first year after HTx, and 7.5% (3/40) after the first year following HTx. Four patients, who were intubated due to respiratory failure, died. In one patient, renal replacement therapy de novo was introduced. In 3 patients (6%), the left ventricular ejection fraction was already decreased before COVID-19. In none of the patients, left ventricular ejection fraction changed by more than 5% when compared to the baseline examination. In one patient after COVID-19, a significant acute cellular rejection was diagnosed based on elective endomyocardial biopsy. Two patients within the first year after HTx and 5 patients after the first year following Htx were asymptomatic.

Immunosuppressive modifications were performed only in symptomatic patients and included dose reduction of mycophenolate mofetil or cessation and/or additional steroid administration. Dose reduction of mycophenolate mofetil was used in 2 patients (5%), and temporary cessation in 11 patients (37% of the whole group on mycophenolate mofetil). Among the deceased patients, mycophenolate mofetil was used in four subjects. However, it was suspended due to the disease (n = 2). The doses of tacrolimus were not modified and the median whole blood concentration of tacrolimus in survivors was 8.81 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.2110.52 ng/ml), and 7.2 ng/ml in deceased patients (IQR, 6.178.49 ng/ml; P = 0.493). The doses of prednisone were not modified due to the disease.

Additional doses of dexamethasone were introduced in two patients (>1 year after HTx). In four patients, convalescent plasma was used, whereas azithromycin was given to four patients. Other antibiotics were administered to three patients. Remdesivir was used in one patient who recovered.

In our study, total mortality of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection cases reached only 12%, but it was still unacceptably high when compared to the general population (2.6%) [2].

Notably, the mortality rate in patients within the first year after HTx was four times higher than in the group >1 year after HTx. This could be explained by more potent immunosuppressive treatment and a weakened general condition due to HTx and previous long-standing end-stage heart failure. In particular, we also observed that comorbidities, such as heart or renal failure, resulted in an unfavorable outcome. We found significant differences in the baseline creatinine level in favor of survivors. Also, lower exercise capacity before infection, assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, adversely influenced the outcome. The association between heart failure and adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients was reported for the general population previously [3, 4].

All the clinical symptoms were typical of the general population. In our group of patients, despite a low number of COVID-19 cases, it was noticeable that the deceased patients had a lower lymphocyte count compared to the survivors.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Kates OS, Haydel BM, Florman SS, et al. UW COVID-19 SOT Study Team. Coronavirus disease 2019 in solid organ transplant: a multicenter cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 73(11): e4090e4099, doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1097, indexed in Pubmed: 32766815.
  2. 2. Mortality analyses. Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. Coronavirus Resource Center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality (September 27, 2021).
  3. 3. Terlecki M, Wojciechowska W, Klocek M, et al. Association between cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular drug therapy, and in-hospital outcomes in patients with COVID-19: data from a large single-center registry in Poland. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(7-8): 773780, doi: 10.33963/KP.15990, indexed in Pubmed: 33926173.
  4. 4. Niedziela JT, Jaroszewicz J, Wita K, et al. High in-hospital and post-discharge mortality in patients with a pre-existing diagnosis of heart failure hospitalized due to COVID-19. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(1): 9092, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2021.0163, indexed in Pubmed: 34845713.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)