Vol 80, No 2 (2022)
Original article
Published online: 2021-12-31

open access

Page views 5459
Article views/downloads 656
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Complexity of changes in right ventricular morphology and function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery — 3D echocardiographic study

Paulina Wejner-Mik1, Jarosław D Kasprzak1, Ewa Szymczyk1, Katarzyna Wdowiak-Okrojek1, Arkadiusz Ammer2, Grzegorz Religa2, Piotr Lipiec1
Pubmed: 34970985
Kardiol Pol 2022;80(2):156-162.

Abstract

Background: An impairment of standard echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular (RV) function is a known phenomenon in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but its significance remains unclear.
Aims: This study aimed to assess changes in RV function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using speckle tracking and 3D echocardiography.
Methods: The study population comprised 122 patients referred for cardiac surgery. Transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) examinations were performed: before the surgery (TTE1), 1 week after surgery (TTE2), and 1 year after surgery (TTE 3). Parameters measured during these examinations included both standard and advanced indices of the RV size and function, as well as a new parameter introduced by our team — RV shortening fraction (RV SF).
Results: TTE1 was performed on average (standard deviation [SD]) 24 (15) hours before surgery, whereas TTE2 and TTE3 were performed on average 7.2 (3) days and 346 (75) days after the surgery, respectively. A postoperative impairment of parameters of RV longitudinal function was observed (P <0.001). However, neither the RV size assessed by both 2D and 3D techniques changed, nor the global RV function measured with the use of fractional area change and ejection fraction. Additionally, during the postoperative period, an increase in the value of an RV SF by 12.9% was observed. After 12 months we observed an improvement in the parameters of the longitudinal RV function.
Conclusions: Uncomplicated cardiac surgery causes transient impairment of the longitudinal systolic RV function, with no influence on the global RV function. The preservation of global function results from increased RV SF. After 12 months, an improvement of the longitudinal function can be observed.

References

  1. Couperus LE, Delgado V, van Vessem ME, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction after surgical left ventricular restoration: prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 52(6): 1161–1167.
  2. Chowdhury MA, Cook JM, Moukarbel GV, et al. Pre-operative right ventricular echocardiographic parameters associated with short-term outcomes and long-term mortality after CABG. Echo Res Pract. 2018; 5(4): 155–166.
  3. Lella LK, Sales VL, Goldsmith Y, et al. Reduced right ventricular function predicts long-term cardiac re-hospitalization after cardiac surgery. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0132808.
  4. Ágoston G, Morvai-Illés B, Pálinkás A, et al. The role of stress echocardiography in cardiovascular disorders. Kardiol Pol. 2019; 77(11): 1011–1019.
  5. La Gerche A, Claessen G. Right ventricular function: the barometer of all that lies ahead. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12(12): 2386–2388.
  6. Chowdhury MA, Cook JM, Moukarbel GV, et al. Pre-operative right ventricular echocardiographic parameters associated with short-term outcomes and long-term mortality after CABG. Echo Res Pract. 2018; 5(4): 155–166.
  7. De Caro E, Bondanza S, Calevo MG, et al. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion for the assessment of ventricular function in adults operated on with mustard procedure for complete transposition of the great arteries. Congenit Heart Dis. 2014; 9(3): 252–258.
  8. Abd El Rahman MY, Hui W, Timme J, et al. Analysis of atrial and ventricular performance by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with atrial septal defects before and after surgical and catheter closure. Echocardiography. 2005; 22(7): 579–585.
  9. Addetia K, Maffessanti F, Muraru D, et al. Morphologic analysis of the normal right ventricle using three-dimensional echocardiography-derived curvature indices. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018; 31(5): 614–623.
  10. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. American Society of Echocardiography, European Association of Echocardiography. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 13(1): 1–46.
  11. Surkova E, Peluso D, Kasprzak JD, et al. Use of novel echocardiographic techniques to assess right ventricular geometry and function. Kardiol Pol. 2016; 74(6): 507–522.
  12. Lipiec P, Bąk J, Braksator W, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography in adults — guidelines of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the Polish Cardiac Society [article in Polish]. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(2): 488–493.
  13. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019; 32(1): 1–64.
  14. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28(1): 1–39.e14.
  15. Vandenheuvel M, Bouchez S, Wouters P, et al. Assessing right ventricular function in the perioperative setting, part I: echo-based measurements. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019; 37(4): 675–695.
  16. Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D, et al. Industry representatives, Reviewers: This document was reviewed by members of the 2016–2018 EACVI Scientific Documents Committee. Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 19(6): 591–600.
  17. Kossaify A. Echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle, from the conventional approach to speckle tracking and three-dimensional imaging, and insights into the "right way" to explore the forgotten chamber. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2015; 9: 65–75.
  18. Alam M, Hedman A, Nordlander R, et al. Right ventricular function before and after an uncomplicated coronary artery bypass graft as assessed by pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging of the tricuspid annulus. Am Heart J. 2003; 146(3): 520–526.
  19. Tamborini G, Muratori M, Brusoni D, et al. Is right ventricular systolic function reduced after cardiac surgery? A two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009; 10(5): 630–634.
  20. Pauliks LB, Chan KC, Chang D, et al. Regional myocardial velocities and isovolumic contraction acceleration before and after device closure of atrial septal defects: a color tissue Doppler study. Am Heart J. 2005; 150(2): 294–301.
  21. Roshanali F, Yousefnia MA, Mandegar MH, et al. Decreased right ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008; 35(3): 250–255.
  22. Yadav H, Unsworth B, Fontana M, et al. Selective right ventricular impairment following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37(2): 393–398.
  23. Diller GP, Wasan BS, Kyriacou A, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass surgery on myocardial function as assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 34(5): 995–999.
  24. Bitcon CJ, Tousignant C. The effect of pericardial incision on right ventricular systolic function: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2017; 64(12): 1194–1201.
  25. Khani M, Hosseintash M, Foroughi M, et al. Assessment of the effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery on right ventricle function using strain and strain rate imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016; 6(2): 138–143.
  26. Rösner A, Avenarius D, Malm S, et al. Changes in right ventricular shape and deformation following coronary artery bypass surgery-insights from echocardiography with strain rate and magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiography. 2015; 32(12): 1809–1820.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)