Vol 79, No 11 (2021)
Short communication
Published online: 2021-10-13

open access

Page views 6327
Article views/downloads 588
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

3D reconstruction for preoperative planning of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return

Alvise Guariento1, Claudia Cattapan1, Elisa Chemello2, Francesco Bertelli1, Massimo Padalino1, Elena Reffo3, Giovanni Di Salvo3, Raffaella Motta2, Vladimiro L Vida1
Pubmed: 34643265
Kardiol Pol 2021;79(11):1271-1273.

Abstract

Not available

References

  1. Gustafson RA, Warden HE, Murray GF, et al. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection to the right side of the heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 98(5 Pt 2): 861–868.
  2. Fragata J, Magalhães M, Baquero L, et al. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connections: surgical management. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013; 4(1): 44–49.
  3. Kuriata J, Kwiatek P, Kołsut P, et al. Supracardiac partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection recognized by computed tomography in an adult patient. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(12): 1299–1300.
  4. Gać P, Macek P, Dziadkowiec B, et al. Multiple atrial septal defects with concomitant partial anomalous pulmonary venous return on cardiac computed tomography. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(4): 348–349.
  5. Eom HJ, Yang DH, Kang JW, et al. Preoperative cardiac computed tomography for demonstration of congenital cardiac septal defect in adults. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25(6): 1614–1622.
  6. Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, et al. Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31(7): 794–805.
  7. Uçar T, Fitoz S, Tutar E, et al. Diagnostic tools in the preoperative evaluation of children with anomalous pulmonary venous connections. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 24(2): 229–235.
  8. Greil GF, Wolf I, Kuettner A, et al. Stereolithographic reproduction of complex cardiac morphology based on high spatial resolution imaging. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96(3): 176–185.
  9. Biglino G, Capelli C, Wray Jo, et al. 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4): e007165.
  10. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, et al. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2015; 35(7): 1965–1988.
  11. Cattapan C, Bertelli F, Guariento A, et al. 3D ultrasound-based fetal heart reconstruction: a pilot protocol in prenatal counselling. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021; 74(6): 549–551.
  12. Raimondi F, Vida V, Godard C, et al. Fast-track virtual reality for cardiac imaging in congenital heart disease. J Card Surg. 2021; 36(7): 2598–2602.
  13. Sodian R, Weber S, Markert M, et al. Stereolithographic models for surgical planning in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83(5): 1854–1857.
  14. Yoo SJ, Spray T, Austin EH, et al. Hands-on surgical training of congenital heart surgery using 3-dimensional print models. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153(6): 1530–1540.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)