Vol 79, No 12 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2021-10-11

open access

Page views 6662
Article views/downloads 804
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Sex-related differences and rotational atherectomy: Analysis of 5 177 percutaneous coronary interventions based on a large national registry from 2014 to 2020

Karol Sabatowski1, Krzysztof P Malinowski2, Zbigniew Siudak3, Krzysztof Reczuch4, Sławomir Dobrzycki5, Maciej Lesiak6, Michał Hawranek7, Robert J Gil8, Adam Witkowski9, Wojciech Wojakowski10, Andrzej Lekston7, Mariusz Gąsior7, Wojciech Wańha10, Jacek Legutko1112, Michał Ekkert13, Magdalena Jędrychowska1, Michał Chyrchel114, Andrzej Surdacki113, Stanisław Bartuś114, Rafał Januszek115
Pubmed: 34643261
Kardiol Pol 2021;79(12):1320-1327.

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with rotational atherectomy (RA) have massively calcified coronary arteries and their prognosis differs between sexes.
Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the trends in the percentage of sexes in the subsequent years, to compare demographic characteristics between men and women, and to identify factors associated with the risk of periprocedural complications and death.
Methods: We analyzed data on 751 113 patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2020 from the Polish National Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (ORPKI). We extracted data on 5 177 (0.7%) patients treated with RA of whom 3 552 (68.6%) were men. To determine risk factors of periprocedural complications and death, a multivariable analysis was performed.
Results: The proportion of PCIs involving RA increased between 2014 and 2020 (P <0.001). Almost twice as many RA procedures were performed on men (68.55%), and that proportion did not change in the following years. The female patients were older (75.2 [8.3] vs. 70.5 [9.2] years; P <0.001). When considering periprocedural complications, their overall rate (3.45% vs. 2.31%; P = 0.01) and death rate (0.68% vs. 0.17%; P = 0.006) were greater among women. Also, via multivariable analysis, female sex was found to be a risk factor for greater periprocedural mortality (P = 0.02) and overall complication rate (P = 0.007).
Conclusions: The majority of patients treated with RA are men and sex-related distribution was stable during the analyzed period. Female sex is a risk factor for greater periprocedural complications and mortality in patients treated with RA.

References

  1. Epps KC, Holper EM, Selzer F, et al. Sex differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention according to age. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016; 9(2 Suppl 1): S16–S25.
  2. Iantorno M, Torguson R, Kolm P, et al. Relation of sex and race to outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol. 2019; 123(6): 913–918.
  3. Kunadian V, Qiu W, Lagerqvist Bo, et al. National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research and Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registries. Gender differences in outcomes and predictors of all-cause mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (data from United Kingdom and Sweden). Am J Cardiol. 2017; 119(2): 210–216.
  4. Kenkre TS, Malhotra P, Johnson BD, et al. Ten-year mortality in the WISE study (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10(12): e003863.
  5. Kovacic JC, Mehran R, Karajgikar R, et al. Female gender and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a large registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 80(4): 514–521.
  6. Parvand M, Rayner-Hartley E, Sedlak T. Recent developments in sex-related differences in presentation, prognosis, and management of coronary artery disease. Can J Cardiol. 2018; 34(4): 390–399.
  7. Januszek R, Pawlik A, Staszczak B, et al. Age and gender differences in clinical outcomes of patients with heavy-calcified coronary artery lesions treated percutaneously with rotational atherectomy. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020; 29(2): 225–233.
  8. Bangalore S, Vlachos HA, Selzer F, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions: insights from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 77(1): 22–28.
  9. Bartuś S, Januszek R, Legutko J, et al. Long-term effects of rotational atherectomy in patients with heavy calcified coronary artery lesions: a single-centre experience. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(6): 564–572.
  10. Giustino G, Mastoris I, Baber U, et al. Correlates and impact of coronary artery calcifications in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: from the Women in Innovation and Drug-Eluting Stents (WIN-DES) collaboration. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(18): 1890–1901.
  11. Nakao YM, Miyamoto Y, Higashi M, et al. Sex differences in impact of coronary artery calcification to predict coronary artery disease. Heart. 2018; 104(13): 1118–1124.
  12. Januszek R, Siudak Z, Dziewierz A, et al. Predictors of in-hospital effectiveness and complications of rotational atherectomy (from the ORPKI Polish National Registry 2014–2016). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 92(4): E278–E287.
  13. Barbato E, Carrié D, Dardas P, et al. European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2015; 11(1): 30–36.
  14. Januszek R, Siudak Z, Reczuch K, et al. Current trends and procedural outcomes in the era of rotational atherectomy expansion in Poland in the period 2014–2017 (based on the nationwide ORPKI registry). Adv Interv Cardiol. 2019; 15(2): 158–166.
  15. Dobrzycki S, Reczuch K, Legutko J, et al. Rotational atherectomy in everyday clinical practice. Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Society of Cardiology (Asocjacja Interwencji Sercowo-Naczyniowych Polskiego Towarzystwa Kardiologicznego — AISN PTK): Expert opinion. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(11): 1576–1584.
  16. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(2): 87–165.
  17. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), ESC National Cardiac Societies. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(3): 213–260.
  18. Januszek R, Siudak Z, Malinowski KP, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and rotational atherectomy. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(6): 529–536.
  19. Ford TJ, Khan A, Docherty KF, et al. Sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 95(2): 232–241.
  20. Januszek RA, Dziewierz A, Siudak Z, et al. Diabetes and periprocedural outcomes in patients treated with rotablation during percutaneous coronary interventions. Cardiol J. 2018 [Epub ahead of print]; 7(2): 152–161.
  21. Allali A, Abdelghani M, Mankerious N, et al. Feasibility and clinical outcome of rotational atherectomy in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93(3): 382–389.
  22. Bouisset F, Barbato E, Reczuch K, et al. Clinical outcomes of PCI with rotational atherectomy: the European multicentre Euro4C registry. EuroIntervention. 2020; 16(4): e305–e312.
  23. Jhand A, Atti V, Gwon Y, et al. Meta-analysis of transradial vs transfemoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2021; 141: 23–30.
  24. Kar S, Shah A. Outcomes of dorsal distal radial, radial, and ulnar artery percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrasound guidance in acute myocardial infarction. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021; 46(6): 100822.
  25. Colletti G, Auslender J, De Meester A, et al. Feasibility and safety of performing complex coronary interventions by distal radial artery using the railway sheathless vascular system. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020; 32(12): 459–462.
  26. Wojciuk J, Beijk MA, Goode G, et al. Balloon-assisted tracking technique as 'a way forward' for transradial intervention. Coron Artery Dis. 2019; 30(6): 440–447.
  27. Azzalini L, Poletti E, Ayoub M, et al. Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2019; 15(9): e804–e811.
  28. Aly I, Rizvi A, Roberts W, et al. Cardiac ultrasound: an anatomical and clinical review. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2021; 22: 100083.
  29. Januszek R, Siudak Z, Malinowski KP, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy in patients with acute myocardial infarction-5-year analysis based on a large national registry (ORPKI). J Clin Med. 2020; 9(11): 3610.
  30. Jolly SS, James S, Džavík V, et al. Thrombus aspiration in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient meta-analysis: thrombectomy trialists collaboration. Circulation. 2017; 135(2): 143–152.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)