Vol 74, No 4 (2016)
Original articles
Published online: 2015-09-23

open access

Page views 1042
Article views/downloads 1021
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients after previous coronary artery bypass surgery

Piotr Zając, Paweł Życiński, Haval Qawoq, Łukasz Jankowski, Jan Peruga, Tomasz Wcisło, Piotr Pagórek, Jan Z. Peruga, Jarosław D. Kasprzak, Michał Plewka
Kardiol Pol 2016;74(4):322-330.

Abstract

Background: Patients after previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often require repeat percutaneous revascularisa­tion due to poor patency rates of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and higher risk of re-CABG. Few data are available to evaluate different percutaneous revascularisation strategies in patients after previous CABG.

Aim: To evaluate outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients after previous CABG, including the ef­fect of treatment on the quality of life and symptoms, and secondly to assess the relation between angiographic factors and treatment outcomes

Methods: This was a prospective observational study which included 78 patients after previous CABG. Following coronary angiography, the patients were assigned to one of three groups: group A (n = 20), PCI of a SVG (PCI SVG); group B (n = 29), PCI of a native coronary artery (PCI NA); group C (n = 29), control group that received medical treatment (MT) only. Dura­tion of follow-up was 12 months.

Results: Compared to MT patients, patients treated with PCI had significantly higher Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class (2.75 vs. 2.41, p = 0.03) and more frequently had coronary angiography performed due to unstable angina (57% vs. 31%, p = 0.04). Patients in the PCI SVG group had significantly older SVG conduits compared to the PCI NA group (13.4 years vs. 8.2 years, p = 0.005). At 12 months of follow-up, we found a significant improvement in the EQ-5D index of the quality of life, and a significant reduction in CCS class in the PCI SVG group (0.66 vs. 0.7, p = 0.0003, and 2.75 vs. 1.9, p < 0.001, respectively) and in the PCI NA group (0.65 vs. 0.72, p < 0.001, and 2.75 vs. 2.17, p < 0.001, respectively), but no improve­ment in the MT group. Treatment outcomes did not differ significantly between the three groups (combined endpoint rate 20% vs. 13% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.37). In multivariate analysis, SVG age > 11 years was identified as a significant predictor of poor outcomes in patients treated with PCI after previous CABG.

Conclusions: PCI in patients after previous CABG does not improve prognosis but significantly improves the quality of life and reduces symptom severity.




Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)