open access

Vol 72, No 6 (2014)
Original articles
Published online: 2014-06-11
Get Citation

Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation

Janusz Kochman, Arkadiusz Pietrasik, Adam Rdzanak, Jacek Jąkała, Wojciech Zasada, Anna Ścibisz, Łukasz Kołtowski, Klaudia Proniewska, Elżbieta Pociask, Jacek Legutko
DOI: 10.5603/KP.a2013.0317
·
Kardiol Pol 2014;72(6):534-540.

open access

Vol 72, No 6 (2014)
Original articles
Published online: 2014-06-11

Abstract

Background: The amount of data comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the detection of stent coverage in clinical settings is limited.

Aim: To make a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the vascular healing patterns in patients after stent implantations visualised by both IVUS and OCT.

Methods: Images were obtained in patients with clinical symptoms of angina, who had had a bare metal stent implanted in the previous 12 months. Angiography, IVUS and OCT were performed in 14 coronary arteries. Measurements of stent, lumen and neo-intima areas and dimensions were performed in stented regions and in both 10 mm references. IVUS, OCT, and angiographic data were compared in matched regions. Off-line analyses were performed by an independent core lab.

Results: 14 stents were imaged without any procedural complications. The nominal stent length was 28 ± 4.5 mm. OCT was the most accurate technique for assessing stent length (28.12 ± 6.8 mm), while QCA underestimated length due to foreshortening (22.16 ± 6.39 mm) and IVUS was vulnerable to random error due to discontinuous pullbacks and vessel movements (24.21 ± 7.90 mm). Minimum lumen area (MLA) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) in reference sites were comparable in IVUS and OCT, whereas there were significant differences between these two modalities for MLA (3.30 ± 1.49 vs. 2.19 ± 1.30 mm2, p = 0.0046) and for MLD (2.42 ± 0.51 vs. 1.58 ± 0.56 mm2, p = 0.0023) in stented segments. There was a slight overestimation of lumen volume (130.18 ± 70.61 vs. 117.82 ± 67.02 mm3, p = 0.7256),a marked overestimation of stent volume (179.29 ± 97.58 vs. 226.46 ± 108.76 mm3, p = 0.0544) and a statistically significant difference in the neointima volume (49.11 ± 39.70 vs. 108.64 ± 43.77 mm3, p = 0.0060) by IVUS compared to OCT. Mean neointima burden in IVUS was much smaller than in OCT (20.79 ± 14.27% vs. 58.16 ± 18.25%, p = 0.0033).

Conclusions: OCT can precisely quantify struts coverage and is more accurate than IVUS in the assessment of vascular healingin patients after stent implantation.

Abstract

Background: The amount of data comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the detection of stent coverage in clinical settings is limited.

Aim: To make a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the vascular healing patterns in patients after stent implantations visualised by both IVUS and OCT.

Methods: Images were obtained in patients with clinical symptoms of angina, who had had a bare metal stent implanted in the previous 12 months. Angiography, IVUS and OCT were performed in 14 coronary arteries. Measurements of stent, lumen and neo-intima areas and dimensions were performed in stented regions and in both 10 mm references. IVUS, OCT, and angiographic data were compared in matched regions. Off-line analyses were performed by an independent core lab.

Results: 14 stents were imaged without any procedural complications. The nominal stent length was 28 ± 4.5 mm. OCT was the most accurate technique for assessing stent length (28.12 ± 6.8 mm), while QCA underestimated length due to foreshortening (22.16 ± 6.39 mm) and IVUS was vulnerable to random error due to discontinuous pullbacks and vessel movements (24.21 ± 7.90 mm). Minimum lumen area (MLA) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) in reference sites were comparable in IVUS and OCT, whereas there were significant differences between these two modalities for MLA (3.30 ± 1.49 vs. 2.19 ± 1.30 mm2, p = 0.0046) and for MLD (2.42 ± 0.51 vs. 1.58 ± 0.56 mm2, p = 0.0023) in stented segments. There was a slight overestimation of lumen volume (130.18 ± 70.61 vs. 117.82 ± 67.02 mm3, p = 0.7256),a marked overestimation of stent volume (179.29 ± 97.58 vs. 226.46 ± 108.76 mm3, p = 0.0544) and a statistically significant difference in the neointima volume (49.11 ± 39.70 vs. 108.64 ± 43.77 mm3, p = 0.0060) by IVUS compared to OCT. Mean neointima burden in IVUS was much smaller than in OCT (20.79 ± 14.27% vs. 58.16 ± 18.25%, p = 0.0033).

Conclusions: OCT can precisely quantify struts coverage and is more accurate than IVUS in the assessment of vascular healingin patients after stent implantation.

Get Citation

Keywords

angiography, IVUS, OCT, in-stent restenosis, neointima

About this article
Title

Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation

Journal

Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal)

Issue

Vol 72, No 6 (2014)

Pages

534-540

Published online

2014-06-11

DOI

10.5603/KP.a2013.0317

Bibliographic record

Kardiol Pol 2014;72(6):534-540.

Keywords

angiography
IVUS
OCT
in-stent restenosis
neointima

Authors

Janusz Kochman
Arkadiusz Pietrasik
Adam Rdzanak
Jacek Jąkała
Wojciech Zasada
Anna Ścibisz
Łukasz Kołtowski
Klaudia Proniewska
Elżbieta Pociask
Jacek Legutko

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Sp. z o.o. VM Group Sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73 , 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

phone:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl