Vol 73, No 6 (2015)
Letters to the Editor
Published online: 2015-06-22

open access

Page views 643
Article views/downloads 268
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Kardiologia Polska 2015 nr 6-31

LIST DO REDAKCJI / LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Folic acid improves renal function — in what mechanism?

Kwas foliowy poprawia czynność nerek — w jakim mechanizmie?

Tomasz Stompór1, Anetta Undas2

1Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Internal Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
2Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland

Address for correspondence:
Prof. Tomasz Stompór, MD, Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Internal Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, ul. Żołnierska 18, 10–561 Olsztyn, Poland, tel: +48 89 5386219, fax: +48 89 5337882, e-mail: stompin@mp.pl

In their interesting study published recently in “Kardiologia Polska” Mierzecki et al. [1] aimed to evaluate the effect of a diet containing low vs. moderate amounts of folic acid (FA) on several parameters of inflammation and blood coagulation, lipid profile, and renal function in apparently healthy young patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. Additional administration of 0.4 mg/d FA reduced plasma concentrations of total homocysteine (tHcy) by about 20%, in line with increased serum FA levels, regardless of the self-reported dietary intake of FA [1]. A higher intake of FA did not have a significant impact on any of the variables measured except for a 22.5% decrease in serum creatinine and 9.9% increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in young subjects who reported FA intake below 40% of the reference value. To reinforce the concept of FA supplementation as a factor improving renal function, it would be of interest to assess associations between FA-induced changes in renal function and alterations in tHcy and FA concentrations. It is known that FA supplementation improves endothelial function via multiple mechanisms, and its noninvasive assessment (e.g. using tonometry) could validate this hypothesis [2], possibly confirming that this mechanism is important in increasing GFR observed in young people following FA. Moreover, given the key role of the kidneys in clearance of Hcy, the study results suggest that lowering Hcy, not increasing FA concentration, may be a ‘primary’ event that leads to improvement in renal function. Even more interestingly, although the baseline renal function, as well as tHcy, in the study subjects were normal, there was still the potential to increase GFR following intake of FA. It is unclear, however, whether improved renal function following FA administration can also be observed in older patients suffering from cardiovascular disease, in whom endothelial dysfunction is common, and if this effect can be beneficial in terms of major clinical outcomes, or neutral, as indicated by several clinical trials cited in the paper [1].

An additional effect of hyperhomocysteinaemia associated with cardiovascular risk and modulated by FA is post-translational protein Nε-homocysteinylation, which may trigger autoimmune response and lead to the formation of potentially harmful specific antibodies, as shown in patients with early-onset coronary artery disease or renal insufficiency [3, 4]. Antibodies to Nε-homocysteinylated proteins may bind to them, with immune complex formation within the glomeruli and tubules; it is possible that lowering tHcy with FA may limit renal injury through mitigation of antibody formation. However, it seems unlikely that FA supplementation in a relatively short period of time would be sufficient to lower autoantibodies against Nε-homocysteinylated proteins, despite a marked decrease in tHcy (as demonstrated in 2006) [5]. It is worth investigating whether improved renal function in young individuals following a three-month FA administration can affect Nε-homocysteinylation and its potential consequences. Recently, elevated Hcy has been shown to specifically up-regulate the inflammatory process and oxidative stress that lead to podocyte injury in an animal model [6]. It could be speculated that attenuation of this mechanism contributes to increased GFR during FA administration, as reported by Mierzecki et al. [1]. Elucidation of the phenomenon of FA-induced improvement of renal function among healthy people is an attractive area of further research.

Conflict of interest: none declared

References

  1. 1. Mierzecki A, Makarewicz-Wujec M, Kłoda K et al. Influence of folic acid supplementation on coagulation, inflammatory, lipid, and the kidney function parameters in subjects with low and moderate content of folic acid in the diet. Kardiol Pol, 2015; 73: 280–286.
  2. 2. Wilk G, Osmenda G, Matusik P et al. Endothelial function assessment in atherosclerosis: comparison of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation and peripheral arterial tonometry. Pol Arch Med Wewn, 2013; 123: 443–452.
  3. 3. Kolarz M, Małyszko J, Stompór T et al. Antibodies against Nε-homocysteinylated proteins in patients on different methods of renal replacement therapy. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2013; 51: 1093–1099.
  4. 4. Undas A, Jankowski M, Twardowska M et al. Antibodies to N-homocysteinylated albumin as a marker for early-onset coronary artery disease in men. Thromb Haemost, 2005; 93: 346–350.
  5. 5. Undas A, Stepien E, Glowacki R et al. Folic acid administration and antibodies against homocysteinylated proteins in subjects with hyperhomocysteinemia. Thromb Haemost, 2006; 96: 342–347.
  6. 6. Abais JM, Xia M, Li G et al. Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation and podocyte injury via thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) during hyperhomocysteinemia. J Biol Chem, 2014; 289: 27159–27168.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)