Vol 79, No 5 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2021-06-08

open access

Page views 444
Article views/downloads 582
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Platelet function in patients undergoing surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparative study

Anna Komosa1, Bartłomiej Perek2, Piotr Rzymski34, Barbara Poniedziałek3, Marek Grygier1, Andrzej Siniawski1, Katarzyna Szabatowska1, Jolanta Siller-Matula56, Marek Jemielity2, Marcin Misterski2, Maciej Lesiak1
Pubmed: 34125929
Kardiol Pol 2021;79(5):554-561.

Abstract

Background: Intervention-induced platelet hypercoagulability may pose a risk of serious adverse events for patients.
Aims: This study aimed to assess whether surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (SAVR and TAVR) differ in periprocedural platelet activity.
Methods: The total number of 24 patients with a mean age (SD) of 71 (13) years who underwent SAVR (n = 12) or TAVR (n = 12) were recruited for the study. The following parameters were evaluated at 4 time-points: (i) platelet indices: total platelet count (PLT), platelet distribution width (PDW) and mean platelet volume (MPV), (ii) MPV/PLT ratio, (iii) platelet level of lipid peroxidation: malondialdehyde (MDA) content and MDA/PLT ratio. Eventually, percentage variations of PLT, PDW, and MPV in relation to the baseline values were determined.
Results: MPV/PLT ratio increased significantly after procedures in both groups (P = 0.01 in TAVI and P = 0.01 in SAVR). MDA concentrations were significantly higher when assessed directly post-procedure (P = 0.04) as well as 24 hours later (P = 0.01) in the SAVR and TAVI groups. The indirect parameter of platelet activity indexed for platelet counts (MDA/PLT) was comparable between both groups before and 48 hours after procedures, but was significantly higher in SAVR patients, particularly after 24 hours after interventions (P = 0.04; medians TAVR vs SAVR, respectively).
Conclusions: Standard surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with a more pronounced platelet reaction to intervention-induced injury, as compared to the transcatheter-based procedure. The importance of these laboratory findings requires further investigation focused on early and late clinical outcomes.




Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)