Vol 80, No 11 (2022)
Editorial
Published online: 2022-11-30

open access

Page views 3638
Article views/downloads 338
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Association of left atrial enlargement and increased left ventricular wall thickness with arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation

Annamaria Kosztin1, Eperke Merkel1, Bela Merkely1
Pubmed: 36477905
Kardiol Pol 2022;80(11):1070-1071.

Abstract

Not available

EDITORIAL

Association of left atrial enlargement and increased left ventricular wall thickness with arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation

Annamaria Kosztin*Eperke Merkel*Bela Merkely
Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
*Both authors equally contributed to the study

Related article

by Warminski et al.

Correspondence to:

Annamaria Kosztin, MD, PhD, FESC,

Heart and Vascular Center,

Semmelweis University,

Varosmajor str. 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary,

phone: +36 14 58 68 10,

e-mail: kosztin.annamaria@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2022

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0277

Received: November 22, 2022

Accepted: November 22, 2022

Early publication date: November 30, 2022

Cryoballoon-based (CB) catheter ablation is a safe and effective method to maintain sinus rhythm in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to improve quality of life. Postablation AF recurrence is associated with AF duration, patient age, left atrial size, renal dysfunction, substrate visualization by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or the abundance of epicardial fat tissue [1]. The use of risk prediction models for AF recurrence would be a necessary means to assess patients at risk, but these have only moderate performance [1].

Multiple studies addressed the effect of left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation [1, 2]. Long-term efficacy is highly influenced by left atrial enlargement (LAE), but less so in the case of coincidently reduced LVEF [2], or normal or mildly decreased LVEF [3]. Additionally, left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) correlates with LAE and atrial arrhythmias [1, 4, 5]. Moreover, wall thickness is also known to be associated with unfavorable outcomes (higher rate of ventricular arrhythmias and death [6]), and it has also been linked to the prevalence and recurrence of atrial fibrillation [7–9]. However, we only possess restricted data on LVWT’s role in AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Warmiński et al. studied LVWT to predict AF recurrence after cryoballoon catheter ablation for the first time. The authors presented a retrospective analysis of the effect of concurrent increased LVWT and the presence of LAE on AF recurrence. LVWT and LAE were measured with the use of two-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography (CT). Even though CT identified more frequently common or accessory pulmonary veins, echocardiographic and CT measurements of LAE had similar predictive values. In the case of concurrent increased LVWT and LAE, a high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and transient ischemic attack or stroke was observed. Patients with concomitant increased LVWT and LAE experienced the highest rate of AF recurrence (61.9%) up to 2 years. The recurrence rate decreased in patients with LAE without LVWT, in the presence of increased LVWT without LAE, and was the lowest in patients without an increased LVWT and LAE. Concomitant increased LVWT and LAE were independent predictors of AF recurrence with a 1.8-fold increased risk [10].

Beyond having these new results on easily measured parameters such as LVWT with LAE and AF recurrence after CB ablation, the article by Warmiński et al. is important for everyday clinical practice. It is of utmost importance to aid physicians in identifying patients at risk of AF recurrence. These patients need strict follow-up, especially those with heart failure. Studies such as the one conducted by Warmiński et. al give us easily assessable factors and prediction models with variables like LVWT or left atrial size to identify patients needing close medical attention.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(5): 373498, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612, indexed in Pubmed: 32860505.
  2. Demarchi A, Neumann L, Rordorf R, et al. Long-term outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with severe left atrial enlargement and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Europace. 2021; 23(11): 17511756, doi: 10.1093/europace/euab213, indexed in Pubmed: 34534277.
  3. Jin X, Pan J, Wu H, et al. Are left ventricular ejection fraction and left atrial diameter related to atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation?: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(20): e10822, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010822, indexed in Pubmed: 29768386.
  4. Simek CL, Feldman MD, Haber HL, et al. Relationship between left ventricular wall thickness and left atrial size: comparison with other measures of diastolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995; 8(1): 3747, doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(05)80356-6, indexed in Pubmed: 7710749.
  5. Xu HF, He YM, Qian YX, et al. Left ventricular posterior wall thickness is an independent risk factor for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. West Indian Med J. 2011; 60(6): 647652, indexed in Pubmed: 22512222.
  6. Biton Y, Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, et al. Relative wall thickness and the risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(3): 303312, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.076, indexed in Pubmed: 26796396.
  7. Seko Y, Kato T, Haruna T, et al. Association between atrial fibrillation, atrial enlargement, and left ventricular geometric remodeling. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 6366, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24875-1, indexed in Pubmed: 29686287.
  8. Shah N, Badheka AO, Grover PM, et al. Influence of left ventricular remodeling on atrial fibrillation recurrence and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients undergoing rhythm-control therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 174(2): 288292, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.011, indexed in Pubmed: 24794553.
  9. Li SN, Wang Lu, Dong JZ, et al. Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy predicts recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2018; 41(6): 797802, doi: 10.1002/clc.22957, indexed in Pubmed: 29604089.
  10. Warmiński G, Urbanek P, Orczykowski M, et al. Association of left atrial enlargement and increased left ventricular wall thickness with arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(11): 11041111, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0191, indexed in Pubmed: 35950547.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)