Vol 80, No 12 (2022)
Short communication
Published online: 2022-11-13

open access

Page views 3340
Article views/downloads 348
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Intracoronary ECG monitoring during provocation acetylcholine test in chest pain patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the AChPOL Registry

Jacek Bil1, Robert J Gil1, Dobrin Vassilev2, Leszek Gromadziński3, Dariusz Onichimowski45, Rakesh Jalali67, Adam Kern38
Pubmed: 36621016
Kardiol Pol 2022;80(12):1256-1259.

Abstract

Not available

Short communication

Intracoronary ECG monitoring during provocation acetylcholine test in chest pain patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the AChPOL Registry

Jacek Bil1Robert J Gil1Dobrin Vassilev2Leszek Gromadziński3Dariusz Onichimowski45Rakesh Jalali67Adam Kern38
1Department of Invasive Cardiology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warszawa, Poland
2Cardiology Clinic, “Aleksandrovska” University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
3Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
4Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
5Clinical Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland
6Emergency Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
7Clinical Emergency Department, Regional Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland
8Department of Cardiology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland

Correspondence to:

Jacek Bil, MD, PhD, FESC, Department of Invasive Cardiology,

Center of Postgraduate Medical Education,

Wołoska 137, 02–507 Warszawa, Poland,

phone: +48 47 722 11 00,

e-mail: biljacek@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2022

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0258

Received: July 8, 2022

Accepted: November 9, 2022

Early publication date: November 13, 2022

Introduction

Even 30%–50% of subjects undergoing coronary angiography due to chest pain have no significant lesions in coronary arteries [1]. The problem of patients with ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries is still growing. These patients are characterized not only by recurrent hospitalizations but also by impaired quality of life and, what is important, poor prognosis [2]. In recent years, considerable progress in the invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation has been made, enabling assessment of the function of epicardial and microcirculation vessels during one procedure [3]. But it seemed interesting whether patients with microcirculation dysfunction also have baseline ischemia. The intracoronary electrocardiogram (icECG) is an established method for monitoring ischemia during percutaneous coronary intervention. It provides an opportunity to detect ischemia in its early stages when changes on surface electrocardiogram or angina are not yet prominent [4, 5].

This study aimed to assess if baseline ischemia can be detected with icECG in patients with microvascular spasm confirmed in a provocation test with acetylcholine (AChT).

Methods

The AChPOL Registry was a prospective observational study described earlier [6]. We included patients undergoing the AChT with suspicion of angina evoked by epicardial coronary spasm or coronary microcirculation dysfunction according to the Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group criteria [7]. The institutional review board approved the registry protocol, and all patients signed written informed consent before enrollment in the AChPOL Registry. All patients underwent the AChT according to a standardized protocol. We administered increasing acetylcholine (ACh) doses of over 3 minutes into the coronary arteries via a diagnostic catheter (25, 50, and 100 μg for the left coronary artery; 25, 50, and 75 µg for the right coronary artery) [7–9]. Epicardial coronary spasm was defined as a focal or diffuse reduction of epicardial coronary artery diameter of ≥90% compared to baseline and accompanied by the patient’s symptoms and ischemic electrocardiographic changes (standard surface ECG leads). Microvascular spasm was diagnosed in patients with ischemic ST-segment changes (in the standard surface ECG leads) and angina symptoms, but with an epicardial spasm of <90% decrease in diameter. Diameter artery changes were measured with quantitative coronary angiography [7, 10, 11].

The recording and analysis of icECG were also described previously [12]. Briefly, to obtain the icECG signal, we applied a standard coronary guidewire (BMW Universal II, Abbott Vascular, Plymouth, MN, US). The proximal end of the guidewire was connected to a unipolar lead, used for recording V1V6 on surface ECG. The guidewire was placed in distal segments of each coronary artery. The absolute ST-segment shift in the icECG lead and surface leads I, II, and aVF was determined before the AChT, during the test, and at the end of the procedure. The recorded intracoronary and surface ECG leads, with simultaneously recorded aortic blood pressure curves, were printed and analyzed consecutively. The paper speed was 50 mm/s, and ECG amplitude was calibrated at 10 mm/mV. The points of the beginning of the QRS complex, the end of the QRS complex, and the end of the T-wave were connected and constituted the isoelectric line. If some hallmark points were not distinct, the definition of the isoelectric line was based on 2 hallmark points; the ST-segment shift was calculated as the distance of the corresponding point from the isoelectric line in a perpendicular direction (Figure 1A). icECG recordings were analyzed by two independent researchers who were not familiar with the AChT results.

Figure 1. A. An example of intracoronary electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings. B. Change in ST-segment location during the provocation test with acetylcholine (ACh) in three groups. The first measurement was taken before ACh administration (pre-test), the second measurement was taken just after ACh administration (AChT), and the third dose at the end of the procedure just before removing the guidewire after nitroglycerine administration (post-test). ST-segment deviation is presented as mean (SD). *P <0.05
Abbreviations: AChT, provocation test with acetylcholine

Patients were followed up for 60 months with telephone calls and/or clinical visits.

We present the data as means (standard deviation [SD]) or percentages. We used the χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests in all categorical variables, while one-way analysis of variance was used for all continuous variables. Post hoc analyses using 2-tailed Tukey’s honest significant difference test were conducted to verify the differences between the groups. No corrections for multiple comparisons were applied. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. Two-sided tests were used. We performed statistical analyses with R 3.0.2 for OS (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

Results and Discussion

We performed 54 AChT with simultaneous icECG recording. The epicardial spasm was observed in 35 patients (64.8%), microvascular spasm in 13 (24.1%) patients, and in 6 (11.1%) patients the AChT was negative. The baseline characteristics are presented in Supplementary material, Table S1. There were more women in the microvascular spasm group than in the other two groups (48.6% vs. 76.9% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.01). Also, there were no major periprocedural complications with no episodes of atrial fibrillation, allergic reactions, coronary artery injury, myocardial infarction, or death.

When analyzing the baseline icECG recordings, we observed more pronounced ST-segment depression in the microvascular spasm group than in the epicardial spasm (P <0.01) or AChT(-) groups (P <0.01). During the ACh test (just after ACh administration), there was no difference between the epicardial and microvascular spasm groups regarding ST-segment elevation on icECG. Moreover, after the procedure (also after administering nitroglycerin), in the microvascular spasm group again, ST-segment depression was more pronounced compared with the two other groups (P <0.01) (Figure 1B).

When observing these patients during a 5-year follow-up, we observed that in the microvascular spasm group, there was the lowest rate of entirely or nearly asymptomatic patients (after the introduction of proper medical treatment). These rates were 54.3%, 15.4%, and 66.7% in the epicardial spasm, microvascular spasm, and AChT(-) groups, respectively (Supplementary material, Table S2). These findings might show that microvascular spasms were a rather stable or progressive state less susceptible pharmacotherapy, whereas epicardial spasms were a temporary state responding better to applied treatment. The microvascular spams can spark inflammation and markers of increased inflammatory state, which hamper the endothelial function, as well as markers of procoagulant activity may predict ischemic events in coronary microcirculation [13].

This explorative study assessed the application of icECG in detecting myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing the AChT icECG monitoring during AChT confirmed the presence of baseline ischemia in patients with microvascular spasm.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Bil J, Pietraszek N, Pawlowski T, et al. Advances in mechanisms and treatment options of MINOCA caused by vasospasm or microcirculation dysfunction. Curr Pharm Des. 2018; 24(4): 517531, doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180108121253, indexed in Pubmed: 29308736.
  2. Schindler TH, Dilsizian V. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: Clinical considerations and noninvasive diagnosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 13(1 Pt 1): 140155, doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.036, indexed in Pubmed: 30982670.
  3. Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, et al. An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. EuroIntervention. 2021; 16(13): 10491069, doi: 10.4244/EIJY20M07_01, indexed in Pubmed: 32624456.
  4. Hishikari K, Kakuta T, Lee T, et al. ST-segment elevation on intracoronary electrocardiogram after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with worse outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 87(4): E113E121, doi: 10.1002/ccd.26072, indexed in Pubmed: 26152334.
  5. Vassilev D, Dosev L, Collet C, et al. Intracoronary electrocardiogram to guide percutaneous interventions in coronary bifurcations - a proof of concept: the FIESTA (Ffr vs. IcEcgSTA) study. EuroIntervention. 2018; 14(5): e530e537, doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00189, indexed in Pubmed: 28829743.
  6. Bil J, Możeńska O, Segiet-Święcicka A, et al. Revisiting the use of the provocative acetylcholine test in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary arteries: A five-year follow-up of the AChPOL registry, with special focus on patients with MINOCA. Transl Res. 2021; 231: 6475, doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.11.009, indexed in Pubmed: 33232803.
  7. Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(33): 25652568, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv351, indexed in Pubmed: 26245334.
  8. JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasospastic angina (coronary spastic angina) (JCS 2008): digest version. Circ J. 2010; 74(8): 17451762, doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-74-0802, indexed in Pubmed: 20671373.
  9. Bil J, Tyczyński M, Modzelewski P, et al. Acetylcholine provocation test with resting full-cycle ratio, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance give definite answers and improve health-related quality of life. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(12): 12911292, doi: 10.33963/KP.15619, indexed in Pubmed: 32975096.
  10. Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G, et al. High prevalence of a pathological response to acetylcholine testing in patients with stable angina pectoris and unobstructed coronary arteries. The ACOVA Study (Abnormal COronary VAsomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(7): 655662, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.015, indexed in Pubmed: 22322081.
  11. Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G, et al. Clinical usefulness, angiographic characteristics, and safety evaluation of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing among 921 consecutive white patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. Circulation. 2014; 129(17): 17231730, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004096, indexed in Pubmed: 24573349.
  12. Vassilev D, Dosev L, Rigatelli G, et al. Prediction of troponin elevation by means of intracoronary electrocardiogram during percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions (from COronary SIde Branch Residual IschemiA and COllateralization Assessment Study; COSIBRIA & Co Study. Kardiol Pol. 2016; 74(9): 943953, doi: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0057, indexed in Pubmed: 27112944.
  13. Bil J, Pietraszek N, Gil RJ, et al. Complete blood count-derived indices as prognostic factors of 5-year outcomes in patients with confirmed coronary microvascular spasm. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9: 933374, doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.933374, indexed in Pubmed: 35845050.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)