open access

Vol 78, No 9 (2020)
Original article
Published online: 2020-06-02
Get Citation

Long-term outcomes of aortic valve repair in over 500 consecutive patients: a single-center experience

Radosław Gocoł, Marcin Malinowski, Jarosław Bis, Damian Hudziak, Joanna Ciosek, Wojciech Wojakowski, Ewa Gaszewska-Żurek, Marek Jasiński, Marek A. Deja
DOI: 10.33963/KP.15406
·
Pubmed: 32486628
·
Kardiol Pol 2020;78(9):861-868.

open access

Vol 78, No 9 (2020)
Original article
Published online: 2020-06-02

Abstract

Background: Over the last years, aortic valve repair has evolved from being a random and irreproducible procedure to a standardized technique yielding durable long‑term results.

Aims: The aim of the study was to assess long‑term outcomes of aortic valve repair and aortic valve sparing procedures.

Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of all consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve repair and/ or aortic valve sparing root replacement till the end of 2019. We assessed mortality, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from at least moderate aortic valve regurgitation.

Results: A total of 504 patients underwent aortic valve repair and/or aortic valve sparing root replacement over 17 years, including 452 (89.7%) elective and 52 (10.3%) emergency surgeries for acute type A aortic dissections. Median (interquartile range) age was 59 (35–66) years, 72.4% were male. Median follow‑up time was 35 months. Estimated 5‑year survival was 83%, and 10‑year survival was 73%. In 452 patients after elective surgery, the estimated actuarial 5‑year and 10‑year survival was 86% and 75%, respectively. In patients after emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, actuarial 5‑year survival was 62%, and 10‑year survival was 62%. Estimated 5- and 10‑year freedom from reoperation was 96% and 87%, respectively. The comparison of both subgroups did not reveal differences (P = 0.42). Freedom from at least moderate aortic valve regurgitation was confirmed in 86.6% of patients.

Conclusions: Aortic valve repair is a durable and effective surgical procedure associated with low early and late mortality. Aortic valve reconstruction in patients with acute type A aortic dissection yields good long‑term results.

Abstract

Background: Over the last years, aortic valve repair has evolved from being a random and irreproducible procedure to a standardized technique yielding durable long‑term results.

Aims: The aim of the study was to assess long‑term outcomes of aortic valve repair and aortic valve sparing procedures.

Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of all consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve repair and/ or aortic valve sparing root replacement till the end of 2019. We assessed mortality, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from at least moderate aortic valve regurgitation.

Results: A total of 504 patients underwent aortic valve repair and/or aortic valve sparing root replacement over 17 years, including 452 (89.7%) elective and 52 (10.3%) emergency surgeries for acute type A aortic dissections. Median (interquartile range) age was 59 (35–66) years, 72.4% were male. Median follow‑up time was 35 months. Estimated 5‑year survival was 83%, and 10‑year survival was 73%. In 452 patients after elective surgery, the estimated actuarial 5‑year and 10‑year survival was 86% and 75%, respectively. In patients after emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, actuarial 5‑year survival was 62%, and 10‑year survival was 62%. Estimated 5- and 10‑year freedom from reoperation was 96% and 87%, respectively. The comparison of both subgroups did not reveal differences (P = 0.42). Freedom from at least moderate aortic valve regurgitation was confirmed in 86.6% of patients.

Conclusions: Aortic valve repair is a durable and effective surgical procedure associated with low early and late mortality. Aortic valve reconstruction in patients with acute type A aortic dissection yields good long‑term results.

Get Citation
About this article
Title

Long-term outcomes of aortic valve repair in over 500 consecutive patients: a single-center experience

Journal

Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal)

Issue

Vol 78, No 9 (2020)

Article type

Original article

Pages

861-868

Published online

2020-06-02

Page views

228

Article views/downloads

204

DOI

10.33963/KP.15406

Pubmed

32486628

Bibliographic record

Kardiol Pol 2020;78(9):861-868.

Authors

Radosław Gocoł
Marcin Malinowski
Jarosław Bis
Damian Hudziak
Joanna Ciosek
Wojciech Wojakowski
Ewa Gaszewska-Żurek
Marek Jasiński
Marek A. Deja

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Sp. z o.o. VM Group Sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73 , 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

phone:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl