Multimedialna platforma wiedzy medycznej Internetowa Księgarnia Medyczna Kalendarium Konferencji
Ginekologia Polska
MENU
Shortcuts Submit an article Author Guidelines Ahead Of Print Reviewers 2023

open access

Vol 93, No 3 (2022)
Guidelines / Expert consensus
Published online: 2022-02-28
View PDF Download PDF file View HTML
Get Citation

The Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians Guideline for the diagnostic assessment and management of multiple-gestation pregnancy complicated by fetal growth restriction

Katarzyna Kosinska-Kaczynska1, Andrzej Torbé2, Sebastian Kwiatkowski2, Dariusz Borowski34, Grzegorz Breborowicz5, Krzysztof Czajkowski6, Bartosz Czuba7, Hubert Huras8, Katarzyna Janiak9, Anna Kajdy10, Jaroslaw Kalinka11, Przemyslaw Kosinski4, Bozena Leszczynska-Gorzelak12, Radzislaw Mierzynski12, Mariola Ropacka-Lesiak5, Piotr Sieroszewski11, Malgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund13, Miroslaw Wielgos4, Mariusz Zimmer14
DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0244
·
Pubmed: 35315031
·
Ginekol Pol 2022;93(3):256-263.
Affiliations
  1. II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
  2. Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland
  3. Chair of Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
  4. I Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
  5. Chair of Perinatology and Gynaecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  6. I Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
  7. Chair of Woman’s Health, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  8. Chair of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical College, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland
  9. Department of Gynaecology, Procreation and Therapy of Fetus Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
  10. Department of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
  11. I Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
  12. Chair and Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
  13. The Academy of Applied Medical and Social Sciences Elblag, Poland
  14. I Chair and Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

open access

Vol 93, No 3 (2022)
RECOMMENDATIONS
Published online: 2022-02-28

Abstract

The aim of the Guideline is to unify the diagnostic-therapeutic management of multiple-gestation pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction in at least one fetus.

Abstract

The aim of the Guideline is to unify the diagnostic-therapeutic management of multiple-gestation pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction in at least one fetus.

Full Text:

View PDF Download PDF file View HTML
Get Citation
About this article
Title

The Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians Guideline for the diagnostic assessment and management of multiple-gestation pregnancy complicated by fetal growth restriction

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 93, No 3 (2022)

Article type

Guidelines / Expert consensus

Pages

256-263

Published online

2022-02-28

Page views

5444

Article views/downloads

1321

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2021.0244

Pubmed

35315031

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2022;93(3):256-263.

Authors

Katarzyna Kosinska-Kaczynska
Andrzej Torbé
Sebastian Kwiatkowski
Dariusz Borowski
Grzegorz Breborowicz
Krzysztof Czajkowski
Bartosz Czuba
Hubert Huras
Katarzyna Janiak
Anna Kajdy
Jaroslaw Kalinka
Przemyslaw Kosinski
Bozena Leszczynska-Gorzelak
Radzislaw Mierzynski
Mariola Ropacka-Lesiak
Piotr Sieroszewski
Malgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund
Miroslaw Wielgos
Mariusz Zimmer

References (42)
  1. GUS. Rocznik Demograficzny 2019.
  2. Scher AI, Petterson B, Blair E, et al. The risk of mortality or cerebral palsy in twins: a collaborative population-based study. Pediatr Res. 2002; 52(5): 671–681.
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 60(1): 1–70.
    PubMed
  4. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47(2): 247–263.
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. Lopriore E, Sueters M, Middeldorp JM, et al. Twin pregnancies with two separate placental masses can still be monochorionic and have vascular anastomoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(3): 804–808.
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. Ropacka-Lesiak M, Szaflik K, Breborowicz GH. [The diagnostic algorithm in twin pregnancy]. Ginekol Pol. 2015; 86(3): 210–218.
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. Senat MV, Quarello E, Levaillant JM, et al. Determining chorionicity in twin gestations: three-dimensional (3D) multiplanar sonographic measurement of intra-amniotic membrane thickness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28(5): 665–669.
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. Carroll SGM, Soothill PW, Abdel-Fattah SA, et al. Prediction of chorionicity in twin pregnancies at 10-14 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2002; 109(2): 182–186.
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Blickstein I. Is it normal for multiples to be smaller than singletons? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18(4): 613–623.
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D'Antonio F, et al. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45(3): 301–307.
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Nowacka U, Kosińska-Kaczyńska K, Krajewski P, et al. Predictive accuracy of singleton versus customized twin growth chart for adverse perinatal outcome: a cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4): 2016.
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. Gielen M, Lindsey PJ, Derom C, et al. Twin-specific intrauterine 'growth' charts based on cross-sectional birthweight data. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008; 11(2): 224–235.
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Kalafat E, Sebghati M, Thilaganathan B, et al. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(2): 193–199.
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. Khalil A, D'Antonio F, Dias T, et al. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44(2): 210–220.
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. Curado J, Sileo F, Bhide A, et al. Early- and late-onset selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: natural history and diagnostic criteria. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55(5): 661–666.
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. Lewi L, Deprest J. Management of twin pregnancies: where do we go from here? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41(6): 601–604.
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M, et al. Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(1): 94–103.
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Khalil A, Beune I, Hecher K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(1): 47–54.
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Valsky DV, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management dilemmas. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15(6): 342–348.
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B, et al. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Second-trimester discordance and adverse perinatal outcome in twins: the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. BJOG. 2014; 121(4): 422–429.
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(2): 298–312.
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. Gratacós E, Lewi L, Muñoz B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30(1): 28–34.
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. Rustico MA, Consonni D, Lanna M, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: changing patterns in umbilical artery Doppler flow and outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49(3): 387–393.
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Townsend R, D'Antonio F, Sileo FG, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(1): 36–46.
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. Bennasar M, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22(6): 376–382.
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. Ishii K, Murakoshi T, Takahashi Y, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009; 26(3): 157–161.
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Chmait RH, Chon AH, Korst LM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction (SIUGR) type II: proposed subclassification to guide surgical management. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 [Epub ahead of print]: 1–8.
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Denbow ML, Cox P, Taylor M, et al. Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(2): 417–426.
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. Lewi L, Cannie M, Blickstein I, et al. Placental sharing, birthweight discordance, and vascular anastomoses in monochorionic diamniotic twin placentas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197(6): 587.e1–587.e8.
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. Ortiz JU, Eixarch E, Peguero A, et al. Chorioamniotic membrane separation after fetoscopy in monochorionic twin pregnancy: incidence and impact on perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47(3): 345–349.
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. Gratacós E, Antolin E, Lewi L, et al. Monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (Type III): feasibility and perinatal outcome of fetoscopic placental laser coagulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(6): 669–675.
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. Kowalska-Jasiecka J, Ropacka-Lesiak M, Breborowicz G. [Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies]. Ginekol Pol. 2012; 83(8): 618–621.
    PubMed
  33. Muñoz-Abellana B, Hernandez-Andrade E, Figueroa-Diesel H, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-like changes in monochorionic twin pregnancies with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent/reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30(7): 977–982.
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. de Haseth SB, Haak MC, Roest AAW, et al. Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction. Case Rep Pediatr. 2012; 2012: 426825.
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Raboisson MJ, et al. The relationship between an aortic isthmus blood flow velocity index and the postnatal neurodevelopmental status of fetuses with placental circulatory insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192(2): 497–503.
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. D'Alton ME, Simpson LL. Syndromes in twins. Semin Perinatol. 1995; 19(5): 375–386.
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. Ong SSC, Zamora J, Khan KS, et al. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG. 2006; 113(9): 992–998.
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. Hillman SC, Morris RK, Kilby MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(4): 928–940.
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. Senat MV, Bernard JP, Loizeau S, et al. Management of single fetal death in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a role for fetal blood sampling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 20(4): 360–363.
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. Righini A, Salmona S, Bianchini E, et al. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ischemic brain lesions in the survivors of monochorionic twin pregnancies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004; 28(1): 87–92.
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. Kwiatkowski S, Torbe A, Borowski D, et al. Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians Recommendations on diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Ginekol Pol. 2020; 91(10): 634–643.
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. Gao Yu, He Z, Luo Y, et al. Selective and non-selective intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies: high-risk factors and perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 285(4): 973–978.
    CrossRefPubMed

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl