open access
Polski
Cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM) in outpatient hysteroscopy
open access
Abstract
Objectives: Outpatient hysteroscopy has become an integral part of postgraduate training in gynecology. It is an operator-dependent procedure, however there are no recommendations regarding total number of performed procedures to reach proficiency.
Material and methods: This study aimed to assess the learning curve (LC) using cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).
Results: A success rate of 97% a failure rate ≥ 10% were established to denote an adequate and an inadequate performance. A third-year trainee needed 56 procedures to reach the predefined level of performance.
Conclusions: As the length of the LC for outpatient hysteroscopy seems highly variable, it is reasonable to provide tailored monitoring while training.
Abstract
Objectives: Outpatient hysteroscopy has become an integral part of postgraduate training in gynecology. It is an operator-dependent procedure, however there are no recommendations regarding total number of performed procedures to reach proficiency.
Material and methods: This study aimed to assess the learning curve (LC) using cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).
Results: A success rate of 97% a failure rate ≥ 10% were established to denote an adequate and an inadequate performance. A third-year trainee needed 56 procedures to reach the predefined level of performance.
Conclusions: As the length of the LC for outpatient hysteroscopy seems highly variable, it is reasonable to provide tailored monitoring while training.
Keywords
LC-CUSUM, CUSUM, learning curve, hysteroscopy, outpatient hysteroscopy
About this articleTitle
Cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM) in outpatient hysteroscopy
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
9-12
Published online
2017-01-31
Page views
1796
Article views/downloads
2394
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2017;88(1):9-12.
Keywords
LC-CUSUM
CUSUM
learning curve
hysteroscopy
outpatient hysteroscopy
Authors
Tadeusz Issat
Jaroslaw Beta
Marcin Januszewski
Artur J. Jakimiuk
References (12)- Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A. When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003; 38(5): 720–724.
- Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT. Monitoring paired binary surgical outcomes using cumulative sum charts. Stat Med. 1999; 18(1): 69–86, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990115)18:1<69::aid-sim966>3.0.co;2-l.
- Nizard RS, Porcher R, Ravaud P, et al. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004(425): 180–188.
- Boulkedid R, Sibony O, Bossu-Salvador C, et al. Monitoring healthcare quality in an obstetrics and gynaecology department using a CUSUM chart. BJOG. 2010; 117(10): 1225–1235.
- Balsyte D, Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, et al. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35(4): 449–455.
- Biau DJ, Porcher R, Salomon LJ. CUSUM: a tool for ongoing assessment of performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(3): 252–255.
- Biau DJ, Williams SM, Schlup MM, et al. Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM. Br J Surg. 2008; 95(7): 925–929.
- Dessolle L, Fréour T, Barrière P, et al. How soon can I be proficient in embryo transfer? Lessons from the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM). Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25(2): 380–386.
- Campbell RD, Hecker KG, Biau DJ, et al. Student attainment of proficiency in a clinical skill: the assessment of individual learning curves. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(2): e88526.
- Montgomery DC. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 6th edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. : 2008.
- Issat T, Beta J, Nowicka MA, et al. Accuracy and diagnostic value of outpatient hysteroscopy for malign and benign disease. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2014; 35(1): 52–55.
- De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, et al. Office hysteroscopy and compliance: mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18(11): 2441–2445.
