open access
The Polish women’s experience and level of knowledge about fertility and its disorders — a cross-sectional study
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
- OVIklinika Infertility Center, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of History of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
- Premium Medical, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, the Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
open access
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the experience and knowledge of Polish women up to 50 years of age about fertility and its disorders.
Material and methods: A self-composed questionnaire consisting of 44 questions, divided into six sections, was available in social media from January until February 2020. The answers to 13 single-choice questions were analyzed to assess the level of knowledge. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Statistica 13.0, with p value < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: A total of 3,321 correctly filled out questionnaires were obtained. The average result was 8.88 out of 13 single- choice questions regarding the basics of the menstrual cycle and infertility (median 9, standard deviation [SD] 2.21). As many as 65.2% of respondents did not know which days in the cycle were fertile days. The women who had been and/or were pregnant at the time of survey, more often answered better than those, who had never given birth. They had a better mean score of 13 single-choice questions compared to those who had never been pregnant (9.02 vs 8.61, p < 0.001). Respondents who obtained information about infertility from doctors in 86.97% knew that regular intercourse meant 2–3 times per week in comparison to 79.7% of those who were not educated by medical practitioners (p < 0.0001). 69.8% respondents from the first group knew that the test of ovarian reserve existed in comparison to 55.63% of women from the second group (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The research has shown that the knowledge about fertility and its disorders is not satisfying among Polish women.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the experience and knowledge of Polish women up to 50 years of age about fertility and its disorders.
Material and methods: A self-composed questionnaire consisting of 44 questions, divided into six sections, was available in social media from January until February 2020. The answers to 13 single-choice questions were analyzed to assess the level of knowledge. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Statistica 13.0, with p value < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: A total of 3,321 correctly filled out questionnaires were obtained. The average result was 8.88 out of 13 single- choice questions regarding the basics of the menstrual cycle and infertility (median 9, standard deviation [SD] 2.21). As many as 65.2% of respondents did not know which days in the cycle were fertile days. The women who had been and/or were pregnant at the time of survey, more often answered better than those, who had never given birth. They had a better mean score of 13 single-choice questions compared to those who had never been pregnant (9.02 vs 8.61, p < 0.001). Respondents who obtained information about infertility from doctors in 86.97% knew that regular intercourse meant 2–3 times per week in comparison to 79.7% of those who were not educated by medical practitioners (p < 0.0001). 69.8% respondents from the first group knew that the test of ovarian reserve existed in comparison to 55.63% of women from the second group (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The research has shown that the knowledge about fertility and its disorders is not satisfying among Polish women.
Keywords
reproductive failure; infertility; menstrual cycle; ovulation
Title
The Polish women’s experience and level of knowledge about fertility and its disorders — a cross-sectional study
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
605-615
Published online
2023-04-27
Page views
686
Article views/downloads
351
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2023;94(8):605-615.
Keywords
reproductive failure
infertility
menstrual cycle
ovulation
Authors
Weronika Knap-Wielgus
Aleksandra Zygula
Magdalena Malec
Miroslaw Wielgos
Iwona Szymusik
- Fainberg J, Kashanian JA. Recent advances in understanding and managing male infertility. F1000Res. 2019; 8.
- Koperwas M, Głowacka M. Problem niepłodności wśród kobiet i mężczyzn – epidemiologia, czynniki ryzyka i świadomość społeczna. Aspekty zdrowia i choroby. 2017; 2(3): 31–49.
- Bablok L, Dziadecki W, Szymusik I, et al. Patterns of infertility in Poland - multicenter study. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011; 32(6): 799–804.
- Milewski R, Milewska JA, Czerniecki J, et al. Analiza profilu demograficznego pacjentów leczonych z powodu niepłodności metodami rozrodu wspomaganego w latach 2005-2010. Ginekol Pol. 2013; 84(7): 609–614.
- Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlström P, et al. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(2): 558–564.
- Byamugisha JK, Mirembe FM, Faxelid E, et al. Emergency contraception and fertility awareness among university students in Kampala, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2006; 6(4): 194–200.
- Bretherick KL, Fairbrother N, Avila L, et al. Fertility and aging: do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know? Fertil Steril. 2010; 93(7): 2162–2168.
- Bunting L, Boivin J. Decision-making about seeking medical advice in an internet sample of women trying to get pregnant. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6): 1662–1668.
- Quach S, Librach C. Infertility knowledge and attitudes in urban high school students. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90(6): 2099–2106.
- Hashiloni-Dolev Y, Kaplan A, Shkedi-Rafid S. The fertility myth: Israeli students' knowledge regarding age-related fertility decline and late pregnancies in an era of assisted reproduction technology. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(11): 3045–3053.
- Rovei V, Gennarelli G, Lantieri T, et al. Family planning, fertility awareness and knowledge about Italian legislation on assisted reproduction among Italian academic students. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 20(7): 873–879.
- Infertility Workup for the Women’s Health Specialist. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019; 133(6): e377–e384.
- Łukaszuk K, Kozioł K, Jakiel G, et al. Diagnostyka i leczenie niepłodności — rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Medycyny Rozrodu i Embriologii (PTMRiE) oraz Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologów i Położników (PTGP). Ginekologia i Perinatologia Praktyczna. 2018; 3(3): 112–140.
- Balasch J, Gratacós E. Delayed childbearing. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012; 24(3): 187–193.
- Cierniak-Piotrowska M, Franecka A, Stańczak J, Stelmach K, Znajewska A. Podstawowe informacje o rozwoju demograficznym Polski do 2018. In: Sytuacja demograficzna Polski do 2018 r. Tworzenie i rozpad rodzin. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa 2019: 16–20.
- Warzecha D, Szymusik I, Pietrzak B, et al. Sex education in Poland - a cross-sectional study evaluating over twenty thousand polish women's knowledge of reproductive health issues and contraceptive methods. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1): 689.
- Lundsberg LS, Pal L, Gariepy AM, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding conception and fertility: a population-based survey among reproductive-age United States women. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(3): 767–774.
- Chelli L, Riquet S, Perrin J, et al. Faut-il mieux informer les femmes jeunes sur leur fertilité ? Étude des connaissances sur une population d’étudiantes. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 2015; 43(2): 128–132.
- Hammarberg K, Setter T, Norman RJ, et al. Knowledge about factors that influence fertility among Australians of reproductive age: a population-based survey. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(2): 502–507.
- Daniluk JC, Koert E, Cheung A. Childless women's knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: identifying the gaps. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(2): 420–426.
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4): 611–618.
- Sharma R, Harlev A, Agarwal A, et al. Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(4): 635–645.
- Swift BE, Liu KE. The effect of age, ethnicity, and level of education on fertility awareness and duration of infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36(11): 990–996.
- Deatsman S, Vasilopoulos T, Rhoton-Vlasak A. Age and Fertility: A Study on Patient Awareness. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016; 20(3): 99–106.
- Homan G, Norman RJ. Couples perception regarding how lifestyle might affect fertility: results of a pilot study. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2009; 26(4): 77–86.
- Girum T, Wasie A. Return of fertility after discontinuation of contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contracept Reprod Med. 2018; 3: 9.
- Childress KJ, Lawson AK, Ghant MS, et al. First contact: the intersection of demographics, knowledge, and appraisal of treatment at the initial infertility visit. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(1): 180–187.
- Skogsdal Y, Fadl H, Cao Y, et al. An intervention in contraceptive counseling increased the knowledge about fertility and awareness of preconception health-a randomized controlled trial. Ups J Med Sc. ; 124(3): 203–212.