open access
Vol 93, No 7 (2022)
Other materials agreed with the Editors
Published online: 2022-07-29
Get Citation
Perfect cesarean section — the Holy Grail of obstetricians
1, 1
Affiliations- 2nd Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
open access
Vol 93, No 7 (2022)
EDITORIAL
Published online: 2022-07-29
Abstract
Not available
Abstract
Not available
Get Citation
About this articleTitle
Perfect cesarean section — the Holy Grail of obstetricians
Journal
Issue
Article type
Other materials agreed with the Editors
Pages
523-524
Published online
2022-07-29
Page views
4245
Article views/downloads
449
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2022;93(7):523-524.
Authors
Michal Pomorski
Mariusz Zimmer
References (22)- Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(6).
- Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, et al. Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(4): 777–784.
- Sliwa J, Kryza-Ottou A, Grobelak J, et al. Anterior abdominal fixation - a new option in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Ginekol Pol. 2021; 92(7): 471–474.
- Feduniw S, Warzecha D, Szymusik I, et al. Epidemiology, prevention and management of early postpartum hemorrhage - a systematic review. Ginekol Pol. 2020; 91(1): 38–44.
- Kupiec A, Zwierzchowski J, Kowal-Janicka J, et al. The analgesic efficiency of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after caesarean delivery. Ginekol Pol. 2018; 89(8): 421–424.
- Molina G, Weiser T, Lipsitz S, et al. Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality. JAMA. 2015; 314(21): 2263.
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, et al. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019; 46(4): 797–811.
- Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, et al. Sonographic evaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017; 45(8): 455–460.
- Pomorski M, Zimmer M. Complete separation of the uterine cesarean section scar - a new cause of secondary infertility? Fertil.Steril. 2014; 102(3): 283.
- van der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, et al. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014; 121(2): 145–156.
- Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJK, et al. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(12): 2695–2702.
- Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. J Perinat Med. 2020; 49(1): 5–16.
- Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, et al. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50(5): 578–583.
- Laganà AS, Cromi A, Tozzi R, et al. Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section: Managing an Old Surgery in an Evidence-Based Environment. J Invest Surg. 2019; 32(8): 770–772.
- Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S. Surgical techniques involving the uterus at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004.
- Erkayiran U, Arslanca T. Comparative analysis of classical primary continuous and novel technique uterine suturing methods on uterine scar formation after caesarian section: a prospective clinical study. Ginekol Pol. 2022 [Epub ahead of print].
- Osser OV, Valentin L. Clinical Importance of Appearance of Cesarean Hysterotomy Scar at Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Nonpregnant Women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011; 117(3): 525–532.
- Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, et al. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 205: 141–145.
- Agten AK, Cali G, Monteagudo A, et al. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 216(5): 510.e1–510.e6.
- Zimmer M, Pomorski M, Fuchs T, et al. Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus. Ginekol Pol. 2007; 78(11): 842–846.
- Budny-Winska J, Zimmer-Stelmach A, Pomorski M. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study. Ginekol Pol. 2021; 92(5): 378–382.
- Budny-Winska J, Pomorski M. Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods. Ginekol Pol. 2021; 92(10): 726–730.
