Vol 94, No 1 (2023)
Research paper
Published online: 2022-01-18

open access

Page views 3845
Article views/downloads 649
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Testing of new instrument for measuring quality and diversity of nutrition in pregnancy

Jovana Milosavljević1, Ana Pejčić2, Petar Arsenijević3, Aleksandra Dimitrijević, Miloš Milosavljević2, Dejan Mihajlović4, Slobodan Janković2
Pubmed: 35072252
Ginekol Pol 2023;94(1):73-78.


Objectives: Our aim was construction and development of a new questionnaire for assessing the quality and diversity of nutrition of pregnant women. Material and methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The novel questionnaire was developed through eight steps according with internationally accepted guidelines for questionnaire development. The questionnaire with 18 questions and answers according to the Likert’s scale was created and called Balkan Food Quality and Diversity in Pregnancy Questionnaire-18 (BFQDPQ-18). Reliability testing and factor analysis of BFQDPQ-18 were carried out on a sample of 382 women in the third trimester of pregnancy whose pregnancy control and monitoring were performed at the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Clinical Center in Kragujevac, Serbia. Results: The first test of reliability indicated high levels of internal consistency, with the Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85 of the BFQDPQ-18. After dividing the BFQDPQ-18 into two parts of nine questions each by split-half method, the Cronbach’s alphas were 0.799 and 0.716. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) was 0.878, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity: 1,892.206, p < 0.000. Factor analysis revealed four factors explained in total 51.99% of the variance: mean meal and snack, foods with a low degree of industrial processing, subjective assessment of dietary quality and starchy foods. Conclusions: The final version of the BFQDPQ-18 showed high reliability and good psychometric properties, so we believe it could be useful instrument for assessing the quality of nutrition of pregnant women.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file


  1. Ey CE, Zalilah MS, Ys CY, et al. et al.. Dietary diversity is associated with nutritional status of Orang Asli children in Krau Wildlife Reserve, . Malays J Nutr. 2012; 18(1): 1–13.
  2. Cheng Y, Dibley MJ, Zhang X, et al. Assessment of dietary intake among pregnant women in a rural area of western China. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9: 222.
  3. Vukovic V, Popovic J, Resimic R. Importance of proper nutrition during pregnancy. Sestrinska rec. 2016; 20(73): 7–9.
  4. Abu-Saad K, Fraser D. Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes. Epidemiol Rev. 2010; 32: 5–25.
  5. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines; Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009. 5, Consequences of Gestational Weight Gain for the Mother. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32818/ (01.07.2021).
  6. Plećas D, Plesinac S, Kontić Vucinić O. Nutrition in pregnancy: basic principles and recommendations. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2014; 142(1-2): 125–130.
  7. Neggers Y, Goldenberg RL. Some thoughts on body mass index, micronutrient intakes and pregnancy outcome. J Nutr. 2003; 133(5 Suppl 2): 1737S–1740S.
  8. Walka H, Pollitt E. A preliminary test of a developmental model for the study of undernourished children in Indonesia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000; 54 Suppl 2: S21–S27.
  9. Kiboi W, Kimiywe J, Chege P. Determinants of dietary diversity among pregnant women in Laikipia County, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nutrition. 2017; 3(1).
  10. Ruel MT, Ruel MT. Is dietary diversity an indicator of food security or dietary quality? A review of measurement issues and research needs. Food Nutr Bull. 2003; 24(2): 231–232.
  11. Ruel MT. Operationalizing dietary diversity: a review of measurement issues and research priorities. J Nutr. 2003; 133(11 Suppl 2): 3911S–3926S.
  12. Crozier SR, Inskip HM, Godfrey KM, et al. Dietary patterns in pregnant women: a comparison of food-frequency questionnaires and 4 d prospective diaries. Br J Nutr. 2008; 99(4): 869–875.
  13. Nutritools. Tool Information: FFQ (Pregnant Women). https://www.nutritools.org/tools/140 (01.07.2021).
  14. Colić Barić I, Satalić Z, Keser I, et al. Validation of the folate food frequency questionnaire with serum and erythrocyte folate and plasma homocysteine. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009; 60 Suppl 5: 10–18.
  15. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Applied Social Research Methods), 3rd edition. SAGE Publications, Inc 2011.
  16. Janković SM. Structure of design (plan) of research. In: Janković SM. ed. Research design. 1st ed. Medical Society for Rational Therapy of the Republic of Serbia (Medrat), Kragujevac 2016: 3–25.
  17. Cox JT, Phelan ST. Nutrition during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008; 35(3): 369–83, viii.
  18. Koletzko B, Godfrey KM, Poston L, et al. EarlyNutrition Project Systematic Review Group. Nutrition During Pregnancy, Lactation and Early Childhood and its Implications for Maternal and Long-Term Child Health: The Early Nutrition Project Recommendations. Ann Nutr Metab. 2019; 74(2): 93–106.
  19. Allehdan SS, Tayyem RF, Agraib LM, et al. Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Food Group Intake in Pregnant Jordanian Women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; 119(8): 1349–1361.
  20. Lee R, Nieman D. Nutritional Assessment. 6th edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York 2013.
  21. Bodnar LM, Siega-Riz AM. A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors. Public Health Nutr. 2002; 5(6): 801–809.
  22. Ogawa K, Jwa SC, Kobayashi M, et al. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for Japanese pregnant women with and without nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. J Epidemiol. 2017; 27(5): 201–208.
  23. Shim JS, Oh K, Kim HC. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health. 2014; 36: e2014009.
  24. Turconi G, Celsa M, Rezzani C, et al. Reliability of a dietary questionnaire on food habits, eating behaviour and nutritional knowledge of adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57(6): 753–763.
  25. Erkkola M, Karppinen M, Javanainen J, et al. Folate, vitamin D, and iron intakes are low among pregnant Finnish women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998; 52(10): 742–748.
  26. Robinson S, Godfrey K, Osmond C, et al. Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire used to assess nutrient intakes in pregnant women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996; 50(5): 302–308.
  27. De Vriese SR, De Henauw S, De Backer G, et al. Estimation of dietary fat intake of Belgian pregnant women. Comparison of two methods. Ann Nutr Metab. 2001; 45(6): 273–278.
  28. Brantsaeter AL, Haugen M, Alexander J, et al. Validity of a new food frequency questionnaire for pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Matern Child Nutr. 2008; 4(1): 28–43.
  29. Barbieri P, Crivellenti LC, Nishimura RY, et al. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food group intake by pregnant women. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015; 28 Suppl 1: 38–44.