open access

Vol 92, No 10 (2021)
Research paper
Published online: 2021-08-03
Get Citation

Solving an incomplete puzzle: risk factors of low back pain during pregnancy

Serap Fırtına Tuncer1, Hasan Aykut Tuncer2
·
Pubmed: 34541646
·
Ginekol Pol 2021;92(10):714-719.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Antalya, Türkiye
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı, Pınarbaşı Mahallesi, Antalya, Türkiye

open access

Vol 92, No 10 (2021)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Obstetrics
Published online: 2021-08-03

Abstract

Objectives: Low back pain during pregnancy is a common disorder with an obscure etiopathogenesis. This study sought to investigate the association of low back pain by assessing various epidemiologic and clinical risk factors including weight changes, the presence of striae gravidarum, and intraperitoneal adhesions.
Material and methods: A total of 250 pregnant women between 37 and 40 gestational weeks who were scheduled for cesarean section were included in this multicenter prospective trial. Sociodemographic parameters and physical examination findings were noted and assessed as potential risk factors that may play a role in the development of low back pain.
Results: The mean age of the study population was 29.98 ± 5.23 years and low back pain was identified in 120 (48%) patients. According to the logistic regression results, an increase in BMI (%) during pregnancy (odds ratio: 1.240; 95% CI: 1.061–1.448; p = 0.007) is correlated with the presence of low back pain. Separately, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that an increase in BMI (%) during pregnancy has a sensitivity of 77.5% and a specificity of 60% for the prediction of low back pain, and the cutoff point was found to be 15.5%.
Conclusions: Our results imply that an increase in BMI (%) was correlated with low back pain during pregnancy. Weight gain should be personalized for each pregnancy and the increase in BMI (%) during gestation should be reduced. Measures should be taken to assure appropriate weight control to prevent low back pain during pregnancy.

Abstract

Objectives: Low back pain during pregnancy is a common disorder with an obscure etiopathogenesis. This study sought to investigate the association of low back pain by assessing various epidemiologic and clinical risk factors including weight changes, the presence of striae gravidarum, and intraperitoneal adhesions.
Material and methods: A total of 250 pregnant women between 37 and 40 gestational weeks who were scheduled for cesarean section were included in this multicenter prospective trial. Sociodemographic parameters and physical examination findings were noted and assessed as potential risk factors that may play a role in the development of low back pain.
Results: The mean age of the study population was 29.98 ± 5.23 years and low back pain was identified in 120 (48%) patients. According to the logistic regression results, an increase in BMI (%) during pregnancy (odds ratio: 1.240; 95% CI: 1.061–1.448; p = 0.007) is correlated with the presence of low back pain. Separately, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that an increase in BMI (%) during pregnancy has a sensitivity of 77.5% and a specificity of 60% for the prediction of low back pain, and the cutoff point was found to be 15.5%.
Conclusions: Our results imply that an increase in BMI (%) was correlated with low back pain during pregnancy. Weight gain should be personalized for each pregnancy and the increase in BMI (%) during gestation should be reduced. Measures should be taken to assure appropriate weight control to prevent low back pain during pregnancy.

Get Citation

Keywords

pregnancy, low back pain, body weight, body mass index

About this article
Title

Solving an incomplete puzzle: risk factors of low back pain during pregnancy

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 92, No 10 (2021)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

714-719

Published online

2021-08-03

Page views

6952

Article views/downloads

733

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2021.0117

Pubmed

34541646

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2021;92(10):714-719.

Keywords

pregnancy
low back pain
body weight
body mass index

Authors

Serap Fırtına Tuncer
Hasan Aykut Tuncer

References (18)
  1. Biering-Sorensen F. Low back trouble in a general population of 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old men and women. Study design, representativeness and basic results. Dan Med Bull. 1982; 29(6): 289–299.
  2. Majchrzycki M, Mrozikiewicz PM, Kocur P, et al. Low back pain in pregnant women. Ginekol Pol. 2010; 81(11): 851–855.
  3. Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(7): 575–589.
  4. Mens JM, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, et al. Understanding peripartum pelvic pain. Implications of a patient survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(11): 1363–9; discussion 1369.
  5. Sencan S, Ozcan-Eksi EE, Cuce I, et al. Pregnancy-related low back pain in women in Turkey: Prevalence and risk factors. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018; 61(1): 33–37.
  6. Wang SM, Dezinno P, Maranets I, et al. Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104(1): 65–70.
  7. Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB, Wennergren M. The impact of low back and pelvic pain in pregnancy on the pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991; 70(1): 21–24.
  8. Mogren IM, Pohjanen AI. Low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(8): 983–991.
  9. Kokanalı D, Çağlar AT. Hidden association between the presence and severity of striae gravidarum and low back pain in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 233: 49–52.
  10. Casagrande D, Gugala Z, Clark SM, et al. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23(9): 539–549.
  11. Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, et al. A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(1): 95–103.
  12. Davey CM. Factors associated with the occurrence of striae gravidarum. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972; 79(12): 1113–1114.
  13. Carlson HL, Carlson NL, Pasternak BA, et al. Understanding and managing the back pain of pregnancy. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003; 3(1): 65–71.
  14. To WWK, Wong MWN. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82(12): 1086–1091.
  15. Matsuda N, Kitagaki K, Perrein E, et al. Association between excessive weight gain during pregnancy and persistent low back and pelvic pain after delivery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45(5): 319–324.
  16. Rassmussen KM, Yaktine AL. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health, Washington (DC) 2009.
  17. Nowak M, Kalwa M, Oleksy P, et al. The relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and neonatal birth weight: a retrospective cohort study. Ginekol Pol. 2019; 90(1): 50–54.
  18. Shiri R, Coggon D, Falah-Hassani K. Exercise for the prevention of low back and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2018; 22(1): 19–27.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl