Vol 93, No 1 (2022)
Research paper
Published online: 2021-05-11

open access

Page views 6299
Article views/downloads 1639
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Relationship between Apgar score and umbilical cord blood acid-base balance in full-term and late preterm newborns born in medium and severe conditions

Marta Mlodawska1, Jakub Mlodawski1, Aleksandra Gladys-Jakubczyk2, Grazyna Pazera2
Pubmed: 34105745
Ginekol Pol 2022;93(1):57-62.

Abstract

Objectives: Application of Apgar scores (AS) and umbilical cord blood acid-base analysis is a base for the prediction of future neurological development in children. In clinical practice we often observe huge discrepancy between clinical and biochemical status of newborn. Because many obstetricians consider both assessments as substitute and measure of their proceeding’s outcome, we decided to scientifically measure actual correlation between them among newborns born with Apgar less than 8 points.

Material and methods: This was an observational retrospective study. The study included 141 newborns born in general medium and severe condition (Apgar < 8 points in first minute of life). Acid-base analysis of umbilical cord vein blood immediately after birth was performed. We correlated gasometer parameters with Apgar scores of newborns.

Results: The clinical condition of a newborn at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after birth correlates positively and significantly with pH values (0.25; 0.24; and 0.26; respectively) and bicarbonate levels (0.21; 0.27; 0.28; respectively) in the umbilical cord vein, however correlation was low. Subsequently we qualified newborns to four groups depending on the degree of invasiveness of respiratory support after delivery, and the groups were compared in terms of parameters of acid-based balance. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of acid-base balance parameters.

Conclusions: There is low, but significant correlation between clinical condition of a newborn after birth with most of acid-base parameters from umbilical vein blood. The assessment of the newborn's condition after birth using the Apgar score, (but not acid-base parameters) determines the degree of invasiveness of respiratory support activities for newborns after birth.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Chamberlain G, Banks J. Assessment of the Apgar score. Lancet. 1974; 2(7891): 1225–1228.
  2. American academy of pediatrics committee on fetus and newborn, american college of obstetricians and gynecologists committee on obstetric practice. The Apgar score. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(4): 819–822.
  3. Simon LV, Hashmi MF, Bragg BN. APGAR score. StatPearls [Internet]. 2021.
  4. Montgomery KS. Apgar scores: examining the long-term significance. J Perinat Educ. 2000; 9(3): 5–9.
  5. Ayres-de-Campos D, Arulkumaran S, et al. FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 131(1): 5–8.
  6. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 348, November 2006: Umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108(5): 1319–1322.
  7. Sabol BA, Caughey AB. Acidemia in neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score of 7 or greater — What are the outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215(4): 486.e1–486.e6.
  8. Swanson K, Whelan AR, Grobman WA, et al. Can venous cord gas values predict fetal acidemia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217(3): 364.e1–364.e5.
  9. Ahmadpour-Kacho M, Asnafi N, Javadian M, et al. Correlation between umbilical cord pH and apgar score in high-risk pregnancy. Iran J Pediatr. 2010; 20(4): 401–406.
  10. Wyllie J, Bruinenberg J, Roehr CC, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 7. Resuscitation and support of transition of babies at birth. Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 249–263.
  11. Ehrenstein V. Association of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disability. Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 1: 45–53.
  12. Razaz N, Cnattingius S, Persson M, et al. One-minute and five-minute Apgar scores and child developmental health at 5 years of age: a population-based cohort study in British Columbia, Canada. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(5): e027655.
  13. Persson M, Razaz N, Tedroff K, et al. Five and 10 minute Apgar scores and risks of cerebral palsy and epilepsy: population based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ. 2018; 360: k207.
  14. Gupta S, Natarajan G, Gupta D, et al. Variability in Apgar score assignment among clinicians: role of a simple clarification. Am J Perinatol. 2017; 34(1): 8–13.
  15. Razaz N, Cnattingius S, Joseph KS. Association between Apgar scores of 7 to 9 and neonatal mortality and morbidity: population based cohort study of term infants in Sweden. BMJ. 2019; 365: l1656.
  16. Razaz N, Boyce WT, Brownell M, et al. Five-minute Apgar score as a marker for developmental vulnerability at 5 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016; 101(2): F114–F120.
  17. van Tetering AAC, van de Ven J, Fransen AF, et al. Risk factors of incomplete Apgar score and umbilical cord blood gas analysis: a retrospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30(21): 2539–2544.
  18. Malin GL, Morris RK, Khan KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010; 340: c1471.
  19. Westgate J, Garibaldi JM, Greene KR. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101(12): 1054–1063.
  20. Yeomans ER, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, et al. Umbilical cord pH, PCO2, and bicarbonate following uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151(6): 798–800.
  21. Ross MG, Gala R. Use of umbilical artery base excess: algorithm for the timing of hypoxic injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187(1): 1–9.
  22. Cunningham FG, Leveno K, Bloom S, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Williams Obstetrics: 23rd edition. The McGraw-Hill Education / Medical 2009: 595–598.
  23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, Second Edition. , Washington 2014.
  24. Low JA, Lindsay BG, Derrick EJ. Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with newborn complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177(6): 1391–1394.
  25. Low JA. Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004; 30(4): 276–286.
  26. MacLennan A. A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ. 1999; 319(7216): 1054–1059.
  27. Executive summary: neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second ediction. Report of the american college of obstetricians and gynecologists' task force on neonatal encephalopathy. Obset Gynecol. 2014; 123(4): 896–901.
  28. Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Pazera G, et al. Cerebral palsy and obstetric-neonatological interventions. Ginekol Pol. 2019; 90(12): 722–727.