open access
Awareness and practice of ergonomics by gynecological laparoscopists in Turkey
, 1
Affiliations- Antaya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye
open access
Abstract
Objectives: Ergonomics in laparoscopy has been gaining increasing attention. The research literature on ergonomics is
growing worldwide; however, there are no studies or data from Turkey. Our study provides information on the awareness
and use of ergonomics in laparoscopic gynecology in Turkey.
Material and methods: A questionnaire consisting of 25 questions was sent by email to 225 laparoscopists who are
members of the Turkish Society of Gynecological Endoscopy.
Results: In response, 45.7% of the questionnaires were returned. Six respondents (5.9%) had never experienced pain,
and two respondents (1.9%) always experienced pain during or after laparoscopy. The shoulders, neck, and back were the
most common sites where respondents experienced pain. Most of the respondents (64.1%) utilized one monitor during
laparoscopic surgery, and only 2% of respondents utilized a monitor below eye level. Less than 50% of the respondents
were aware of ergonomic guidelines.
Conclusions: Even though less than half of the Turkish gynecological laparoscopist respondents were aware of ergonomic
guidelines, more than half used appropriate visual systems, operating tables, hand instruments, and had large enough
operating rooms. Only the number and level of monitors used by respondents were not in accordance with ergonomic
guidelines.
Abstract
Objectives: Ergonomics in laparoscopy has been gaining increasing attention. The research literature on ergonomics is
growing worldwide; however, there are no studies or data from Turkey. Our study provides information on the awareness
and use of ergonomics in laparoscopic gynecology in Turkey.
Material and methods: A questionnaire consisting of 25 questions was sent by email to 225 laparoscopists who are
members of the Turkish Society of Gynecological Endoscopy.
Results: In response, 45.7% of the questionnaires were returned. Six respondents (5.9%) had never experienced pain,
and two respondents (1.9%) always experienced pain during or after laparoscopy. The shoulders, neck, and back were the
most common sites where respondents experienced pain. Most of the respondents (64.1%) utilized one monitor during
laparoscopic surgery, and only 2% of respondents utilized a monitor below eye level. Less than 50% of the respondents
were aware of ergonomic guidelines.
Conclusions: Even though less than half of the Turkish gynecological laparoscopist respondents were aware of ergonomic
guidelines, more than half used appropriate visual systems, operating tables, hand instruments, and had large enough
operating rooms. Only the number and level of monitors used by respondents were not in accordance with ergonomic
guidelines.
Keywords
ergonomics; laparoscopy; gynecology; Turkey
About this articleTitle
Awareness and practice of ergonomics by gynecological laparoscopists in Turkey
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
175-180
Published online
2020-03-30
Page views
1235
Article views/downloads
997
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2020;91(4):175-180.
Keywords
ergonomics
laparoscopy
gynecology
Turkey
Authors
Esra Tamburacı
Barış Mülayim
References (18)- Wauben LS, van Veelen MA, Gossot D, et al. Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(8): 1268–1274.
- Janki S, Mulder EE, IJzermans JNM, et al. Ergonomics in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(6): 2457–2466.
- van Veelen MA, Nederlof EAL, Goossens RHM, et al. Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(7): 1077–1081.
- Cass GKS, Vyas S, Akande V. Prolonged laparoscopic surgery is associated with an increased risk of vertebral disc prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 34(1): 74–78.
- Alleblas CCJ, de Man AM, van den Haak L, et al. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons Performing Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(6): 905–920.
- Szeto GPY, Cheng SWK, Poon JTC, et al. Surgeons' static posture and movement repetitions in open and laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. 2012; 172(1): e19–e31.
- Supe AN, Kulkarni GV, Supe PA. Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2010; 6(2): 31–36.
- Yeola M, Gode D, Bora A. Ergonomics in Laparoscopy. Int J Recent Surg Med Sci. 2019; 03(02): 102–108.
- Quinn D, Moohan J. Optimal laparoscopic ergonomics in gynaecology. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2015; 17(2): 77–82.
- Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol. 2001; 15(5): 499–503.
- Franasiak J, Ko EM, Kidd J, et al. Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 126(3): 437–442.
- Current state of ergonomics of operating rooms of Dutch hospitals in the endoscopic era. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2004; 13(3): 156–160.
- Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Goossens RHM, et al. Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(4): 674–678.
- van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, et al. Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23(6): 1279–1285.
- El Shallaly G, Cuschieri A. Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(12): 1879–1882.
- Ferzli GS, Fingerhut A. Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198(1): 163–173.
- Manasnayakorn S, Cuschieri A, Hanna GB. Ideal manipulation angle and instrument length in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(4): 924–929.
- Catanzarite T, Tan-Kim J, Whitcomb EL, et al. Ergonomics in Surgery: A Review. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018; 24(1): 1–12.
