Vol 89, No 3 (2018)
Review paper
Published online: 2018-03-30

open access

Page views 2030
Article views/downloads 1527
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Changes in the parameters of the anterior segment of the eye in pregnant women — literature review

Karol Taradaj1, Tomasz Ginda1, Piotr Ciechanowicz1, Piotr Maciejewicz2, Barbara Suchońska2, Iwona Szymusik2, Bożena Kociszewska-Najman2, Mirosław Wielgoś2, Dariusz Kęcik1
Pubmed: 29664553
Ginekol Pol 2018;89(3):169-173.

Abstract

The physiology of pregnancy is a curious issue for specialists from different branches of medicine and science. In this systematic review, the attention was focused on changes in eyes during pregnancy and confinement. To summarise and systematize actual knowledge in eyes’ changes during pregnancy, publications from years 2011–2017 were analysed. Stud­ies about parameters of corneal endothelial cells, corneal biomechanical parameters, keratometric variables, intraocular pressure and biometry of the anterior chamber were compared. The conducted studies demonstrated the unambiguous character of changes only in case of intraocular pressure, which decreased during the II and III trimesters of pregnancy. Inconsistent study methods and low number of examined patients did not enable to draw explicit conclusions in context of other parameters of the anterior segment of the eye in pregnant women. It is indicated to perform further studies on a representative and homogeneous group of female patients.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Yenerel NM, Küçümen RB. Pregnancy and the Eye. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2015; 45(5): 213–219.
  2. Dewundara SS, Wiggs JL, Sullivan DA, et al. Is Estrogen a Therapeutic Target for Glaucoma? Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 31(1-2): 140–146.
  3. Akar Y, Yucel I, Akar ME, et al. Menstrual cycle-dependent changes in visual field analysis of healthy women. Ophthalmologica. 2005; 219(1): 30–35.
  4. Giuffrè G, Di Rosa L, Fiorino F, et al. Variations in central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in women. Cornea. 2007; 26(2): 144–146.
  5. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Pras E, et al. Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(8): 1507–1511.
  6. Suzuki T, Kinoshita Y, Tachibana M, et al. Expression of sex steroid hormone receptors in human cornea. Curr Eye Res. 2001; 22(1): 28–33.
  7. Ataş M, Duru N, Ulusoy DM, et al. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters during and after pregnancy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014; 37(6): 447–450.
  8. Efe YK, Ugurbas SC, Alpay A, et al. The course of corneal and intraocular pressure changes during pregnancy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012; 47(2): 150–154.
  9. Goldich Y, Cooper M, Barkana Y, et al. Ocular anterior segment changes in pregnancy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40(11): 1868–1871.
  10. Sen E, Onaran Y, Nalcacioglu-Yuksekkaya P, et al. Corneal biomechanical parameters during pregnancy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014; 24(3): 314–319.
  11. Naderan M, Jahanrad A. Anterior, posterior and biomechanical parameters of cornea during pregnancy in healthy eyes: a cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; 102(3): 309–312.
  12. Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, et al. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet's layer (Dua's layer). Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(9): 1778–1785.
  13. Naumann GO, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Keratopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome as a cause of corneal endothelial decompensation: a clinicopathologic study. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(6): 1111–1124.
  14. Örnek N, Özcan Dağ Z, Örnek K. Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Morphology in Different Trimesters of Pregnancy. Eye Contact Lens. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
  15. Lee JS, Park WS, Lee SH, et al. A comparative study of corneal endothelial changes induced by different durations of soft contact lens wear. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 239(1): 1–4.
  16. Okafor KC, Brandt JD. Measuring intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015; 26(2): 103–109.
  17. Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Morales-Fernandez L, et al. New technologies for measuring intraocular pressure. Prog Brain Res. 2015; 221: 67–79.
  18. Patwardhan AA, Khan M, Mollan SP, et al. The importance of central corneal thickness measurements and decision making in general ophthalmology clinics: a masked observational study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2008; 8: 1.
  19. Tolunay HE, Özcan SC, Şükür YE, et al. Changes of intraocular pressure in different trimesters of pregnancy among Syrian refugees in Turkey: A cross-sectional study. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 13(2): 67–70.
  20. FUENTE CL, SANCHEZ-CANO A, PINILLA I, et al. Relationship between IOP and biomechanical corneal values obtained by ORA. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012; 90: 0–0.
  21. Karatepe AS, Onay MP, Eğrilmez S, et al. Menstrüel Siklusun Ön Kamara Parametreleri Üzerine Etkisinin Pentacam ile Araştırılması. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi. 2014; 44(1): 15–18.