Vol 88, No 10 (2017)
Research paper
Published online: 2017-10-31

open access

Page views 3145
Article views/downloads 2402
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Dysregulation of microRNAs in triple-negative breast cancer

Sylwia Paszek12, Natalia Gabło12, Edyta Barnaś3, Małgorzata Szybka4, Jan Morawiec5, Agnieszka Kołacińska56, Izabela Zawlik12
Pubmed: 29192413
Ginekol Pol 2017;88(10):530-536.

Abstract

Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. TNBC is usually diagnosed at a relatively young age and is characterized by high risk of developing metastases. Some epigenetic regulation of gene expression is associated with TNBC. Expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) can serve as a potential tool for identifying critical biomarkers in TNBC. The aim of our study is to examine expression of selected miRNAs in TNBC and to assess the relationship between miRNA expression and clinicopathological factors.

Material and methods: Expression levels of 19 selected miRNAs were compared between cancerous and normal breast tissues by use of qPCR method. We have evaluated the relationship between the expression level of miRNAs and clinicopathological factors such as: age, tumor size and lymph node status.

Results: We found that in TNBC tissues, when compared with normal breast tissues, the expression of miR-190a, miR- 136-5p and miR-126-5p was significantly reduced (p = 0.0041, p = 0.0007, p = 0.0007, respectively) whereas expression of miR-135b-5p and miR-182-5p was significantly increased (p = 0.0194, p = 0.0041, respectively). We found a linear trend for tumor size and expression of miR-126-5p (p = 0.0296) and miR-135b-5p (p = 0.0241).

Conclusions: Our study confirms that miRNA expression profile is dysregulated in TNBC patients compared to healthy controls. MiR-190a, miR-136-5p, miR-126-5p, miR-135b-5p and miR-182-5p may be associated with development and progression of TNBC

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014; 64(1): 9–29.
  2. Cheang MCU, Voduc D, Bajdik C, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(5): 1368–1376.
  3. Hudis CA, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need. Oncologist. 2011; 16 Suppl 1: 1–11.
  4. Godfrey SS, Moses MM, Rorie CJ. Cancer Associated MicroRNAs are Differentially Expressed in Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Normal Breast Cells. Int J Surg Res. 2015: 4–78.
  5. Boyle P. Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological considerations and recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23 Suppl 6: vi7–v12.
  6. Anders C, Carey LA. Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008; 22(11): 1233–9; discussion 1239.
  7. O'Reilly EA, Gubbins L, Sharma S, et al. The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). BBA Clin. 2015; 3: 257–275.
  8. D'Ippolito E, Iorio MV. MicroRNAs and triple negative breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14(11): 22202–22220.
  9. Pillai RS. MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RNA. 2005; 11(12): 1753–1761.
  10. Dvinge H, Git A, Gräf S, et al. The shaping and functional consequences of the microRNA landscape in breast cancer. Nature. 2013; 497(7449): 378–382.
  11. Ha TY. MicroRNAs in Human Diseases: From Cancer to Cardiovascular Disease. Immune Netw. 2011; 11(3): 135–154.
  12. Irshad S, Ellis P, Tutt A. Molecular heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer and its clinical implications. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011; 23(6): 566–577.
  13. Hsu YH, Yao J, Chan LC, et al. Definition of PKC-α, CDK6, and MET as therapeutic targets in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2014; 74(17): 4822–4835.
  14. Avery-Kiejda KA, Braye SG, Mathe A, et al. Decreased expression of key tumour suppressor microRNAs is associated with lymph node metastases in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 51.
  15. Matamala N, Vargas MT, González-Cámpora R, et al. MicroRNA deregulation in triple negative breast cancer reveals a role of miR-498 in regulating BRCA1 expression. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(15): 20068–20079.
  16. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(15): 5245–5250.
  17. Chou CH, Chang NW, Shrestha S, et al. miRTarBase 2016: updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(D1): D239–D247.
  18. Wang F, Zhong S, Zhang H, et al. Prognostic Value of MicroRNA-182 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis. Dis Markers. 2015; 2015: 482146.
  19. Medimegh I, Omrane I, Privat M, et al. MicroRNAs expression in triple negative vs non triple negative breast cancer in Tunisia: interaction with clinical outcome. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e111877.
  20. Wei Q, Lei R, Hu G. Roles of miR-182 in sensory organ development and cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2015; 6(1): 2–9.
  21. Moskwa P, Buffa FM, Pan Y, et al. miR-182-mediated downregulation of BRCA1 impacts DNA repair and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Mol Cell. 2011; 41(2): 210–220.
  22. Severson TM, Peeters J, Majewski I, et al. BRCA1-like signature in triple negative breast cancer: Molecular and clinical characterization reveals subgroups with therapeutic potential. Mol Oncol. 2015; 9(8): 1528–1538.
  23. de Ruijter TC, Veeck J, de Hoon JPJ, et al. Characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011; 137(2): 183–192.
  24. Krishnan K, Steptoe AL, Martin HC, et al. MicroRNA-182-5p targets a network of genes involved in DNA repair. RNA. 2013; 19(2): 230–242.
  25. Arigoni M, Barutello G, Riccardo F, et al. miR-135b coordinates progression of ErbB2-driven mammary carcinomas through suppression of MID1 and MTCH2. Am J Pathol. 2013; 182(6): 2058–2070.
  26. Muñoz-Rodríguez JL, Vrba L, Futscher BW, et al. Differentially expressed microRNAs in postpartum breast cancer in Hispanic women. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4): e0124340.
  27. Hua K, Jin J, Zhao J, et al. miR-135b, upregulated in breast cancer, promotes cell growth and disrupts the cell cycle by regulating LATS2. Int J Oncol. 2016; 48(5): 1997–2006.
  28. Hao Y, Yang J, Yin S, et al. The synergistic regulation of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis through miR-190 and target genes. RNA. 2014; 20(8): 1328–1336.
  29. Chu HW, Cheng CW, Chou WC, et al. A novel estrogen receptor-microRNA 190a-PAR-1-pathway regulates breast cancer progression, a finding initially suggested by genome-wide analysis of loci associated with lymph-node metastasis. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23(2): 355–367.
  30. Yang J, Lan H, Huang X, et al. MicroRNA-126 inhibits tumor cell growth and its expression level correlates with poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e42978.
  31. Wang CZ, Yuan P, Li Y. MiR-126 regulated breast cancer cell invasion by targeting ADAM9. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8(6): 6547–6553.
  32. Tavazoie SF, Alarcón C, Oskarsson T, et al. Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2008; 451(7175): 147–152.
  33. Liu Xi, Sempere LF, Ouyang H, et al. MicroRNA-31 functions as an oncogenic microRNA in mouse and human lung cancer cells by repressing specific tumor suppressors. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(4): 1298–1309.
  34. Zhao H, Liu S, Wang G, et al. Expression of miR-136 is associated with the primary cisplatin resistance of human epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2015; 33(2): 591–598.
  35. Yan M, Li X, Tong D, et al. miR-136 suppresses tumor invasion and metastasis by targeting RASAL2 in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2016; 36(1): 65–71.