open access

Ahead of Print
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2020-01-27
Submitted: 2019-10-02
Accepted: 2020-01-19
Get Citation

Anatomical characterization of the kidneys of Didelphis aurita (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae)

S. V. Peçanha, R. Dünkel-Duarte, F. C. S. Bernardes, T. M. Estruc, R. M. do Nascimento, C. A. dos Santos-Sousa, Paulo de Souza Junior, M. Abidu-Figueiredo
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0006
·
Pubmed: 32020581

open access

Ahead of Print
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2020-01-27
Submitted: 2019-10-02
Accepted: 2020-01-19

Abstract

Didelphis aurita is a marsupial with wide distribution in the South American continent and highly adapted to urban centers. The objective of this study was to describe the measurements and skeletopy of the kidneys and renal vascularization of this species. With this aim, 29 cadavers (14 males and 15 females) of D. aurita collected on highways were analyzed. The rostrum-sacral length of specimens, kidney measurements (length, width and thickness) and the length of the renal vessels were measured and the renal skeletopy registered. In the right kidney, average length, width, thickness and ellipsoid volume were 28.6±5.0 mm, 15.6±2.9 mm, 12.8±3.0mm e 3.3±2.4cm3, respectively; in the left kidney, 31.0±3.8 mm, 14.5±3.6 mm, 12.6±2.6 mm e 3.2±2.2cm3, respectively. There was no significant difference in the comparison of averages of renal dimensions between sexes and between antimeres. The right renal artery (13.2±2.6 mm) was significantly longer (p < 0.01) than the left renal artery (10.7±2.3mm). Oposely, the left renal vein (13.9±3.5 mm) was longer (p < 0.01) than the right renal vein (7.0±2.3 mm). The skeletopy of the right kidney predominated between T13-L1 in 58.6% of the cases and the skeletopy of the left kidney between L1-L3 in 41.4%. The average length of the kidneys corresponded to 6 to 8% of the rostrum-sacral length of the specimens. The data of the present study characterized the measurements and topography of kidneys and renal vessels in D. aurita and can support the interpretation of clinical, experimental and pathological findings in this species.

Abstract

Didelphis aurita is a marsupial with wide distribution in the South American continent and highly adapted to urban centers. The objective of this study was to describe the measurements and skeletopy of the kidneys and renal vascularization of this species. With this aim, 29 cadavers (14 males and 15 females) of D. aurita collected on highways were analyzed. The rostrum-sacral length of specimens, kidney measurements (length, width and thickness) and the length of the renal vessels were measured and the renal skeletopy registered. In the right kidney, average length, width, thickness and ellipsoid volume were 28.6±5.0 mm, 15.6±2.9 mm, 12.8±3.0mm e 3.3±2.4cm3, respectively; in the left kidney, 31.0±3.8 mm, 14.5±3.6 mm, 12.6±2.6 mm e 3.2±2.2cm3, respectively. There was no significant difference in the comparison of averages of renal dimensions between sexes and between antimeres. The right renal artery (13.2±2.6 mm) was significantly longer (p < 0.01) than the left renal artery (10.7±2.3mm). Oposely, the left renal vein (13.9±3.5 mm) was longer (p < 0.01) than the right renal vein (7.0±2.3 mm). The skeletopy of the right kidney predominated between T13-L1 in 58.6% of the cases and the skeletopy of the left kidney between L1-L3 in 41.4%. The average length of the kidneys corresponded to 6 to 8% of the rostrum-sacral length of the specimens. The data of the present study characterized the measurements and topography of kidneys and renal vessels in D. aurita and can support the interpretation of clinical, experimental and pathological findings in this species.

Get Citation

Keywords

animal anatomy, big-eared opossum, marsupial, nephrology, urogenital system

About this article
Title

Anatomical characterization of the kidneys of Didelphis aurita (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae)

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Ahead of Print

Published online

2020-01-27

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2020.0006

Pubmed

32020581

Keywords

animal anatomy
big-eared opossum
marsupial
nephrology
urogenital system

Authors

S. V. Peçanha
R. Dünkel-Duarte
F. C. S. Bernardes
T. M. Estruc
R. M. do Nascimento
C. A. dos Santos-Sousa
Paulo de Souza Junior
M. Abidu-Figueiredo

References (33)
  1. Ahasan A, Islam MS, Kabria A, et al. Major variation in branches of the abdominal aorta in New Zealand white rabbit (Orycotolagus cuniculus). Int J Nat Sci. 2013; 2(4): 91–98.
  2. Barone R. Comparative anatomy of domestic mammals: Angiology. 2nd ed. Vigot, Paris 1996.
  3. Bolat D, Bahar S, Selçuk ML, et al. Morphometric investigations of fresh and fixed rabbit kidney. Eurasian J Vet Sci. 2011; 27(3): 149–154.
  4. Brown BE. Atlas of new world marsupials. Fieldiana Zoology New Series, Chicago 2004.
  5. Cáceres NC, Monteiro-Filho ELA. Reproductive biology of the common opossum, Didelphis marsupialis (Mammalia, Marsupialia), in southern Brazil. Brenesia. 1997; 47: 117–122.
  6. Cerqueira R, Lemos B. Morphometric differentiation between Neotropical black-eared opossums, Didelphis marsupialis and D. aurita (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae). Mammalia. 2000; 64(3).
  7. Culau POV, Azambuja RC, Campos R. Ramos colaterais viscerais da artéria aorta abdominal em Myocastor coypus (nutria). Acta Sci Vet. 2008; 36(3): 241–247.
  8. D´Andrea PS, Roque ALR, Teixeira BR. Alternativas para Animais de Laboratório: uso de animais não-convencionais – roedores silvestres. In: Andrade A, Pinto SC, Oliveira RS (Eds.). Animais de Laboratório: criação e experimentação. Editora Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 2002: 353–360.
  9. Elkin M. Radiology of the urinary system. Little, Brown and Company, Boston 1980.
  10. Evans H, An N. Anatomy of the Ferret. Biology and Diseases of the Ferret. Wiley Online Library, Hoboken. 2014: 23–67.
  11. Evans HE, DeLahunta A. Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 4ª ed. Elsevier, St. Louis 2013.
  12. Fernandes MM, Lemos CC, Lopes GS, et al. Normal renal dimensions in a specific population. Int Braz J Urol. 2002; 28(6): 510–515.
  13. Fonseca GAB, Herrman G, Leite YLR, Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Patton JL. Lista anotada dos mamíferos do Brasil. 4º Ed. Conservation International & Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte 1996.
  14. Gardner AL. Order Didelphimorphia. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM. (Eds.) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. 2nd ed. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC 1993: 15–23.
  15. Graipel ME, Santos-Filhos M. Reprodução e dinâmica populacional de Didelphis aurita Wied-Neuwied (Mammalia: Didelphimorphia) em ambiente periurbano na Ilha de Santa Catarina, Sul do Brasil. Biotemas. 2006; 19(1): 65–73.
  16. Gupta S, Devi ND, Sinam SS, et al. Ultrasonographic renal dimensions in normal adult population of North-East India. Int J Med Health Sci. 2013; 2(4): 433–437.
  17. König HE, Maierl J, Liebich HG. Sistema Urinário (Systema Urinarium). In: Liebich HG (eds.). Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos: Texto e atlas colorido. 6 Ed. Artmed, Porto Alegre 2016: 399–412.
  18. Lemos B, Cerqueira R. Morphological differentiation in the white-eared opossum group (Didelphidae: Didelphis). J Mammal. 2002; 83(2): 354–369, doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0354:mditwe>2.0.co;2.
  19. Liapis H, Vogler G, Steinhardt GF. North American opossum Didelphis virginiana as a fetal nephrotoxicity model: histologic and ultrastructural assessment of uranyl nitrate (UN)-induced damage. Microsc Res Tech. 1997; 39(3): 285–296, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19971101)39:3<285::AID-JEMT7>3.0.CO;2-J.
  20. Möell H. Size of normal kidneys. Acta Radiol. 1956; 46(5): 640–645.
  21. Oyuela-Carrasco J, Rodríguez-Castellanos F, Kimura E, et al. [Renal length measured by ultrasound in adult mexican population]. Nefrologia. 2009; 29(1): 30–34.
  22. Paglia AP, Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Herrmann G, Aguiar LMS, Chiarello AG, Leite YLR, Costa LP, Siciliano S, Kierulff MCM, Mendes SL, Tavares VC, Mittermeier RA, Patton JL. Lista Anotada dos Mamíferos do Brasil / Annotated Cheklist of Brazilian Mammals. 2ª ed. Conservation International, Arlington 2012.
  23. Peters M, Jäncke L, Zilles K. Comparison of overall brain volume and midsagittal corpus callosum surface area as obtained from NMR scans and direct anatomical measures: a within-subject study on autopsy brains. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(10): 1375–1381.
  24. Reis NR, Peracchi AL, Pedro WA, Lima IP. Mamíferos do Brasil. Nelio Reis, Londrina 2006.
  25. Sampaio FJ, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA. [Morphometry of the kidney. Applied study in urology and imaging]. J Urol (Paris). 1989; 95(2): 77–80.
  26. Sampaio FJ. Theoretical kidney volume versus real kidney volume: comparative evaluation in fetuses. Surg Radiol Anat. 1995; 17(1): 71–75.
  27. Sampaio K, Araújo RB. Ultra-sonografia de características lineares e estimativas do volume de rins de cães. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2002; 54(3): 248–254.
  28. Santos-Sousa CA, Stocco AV, Mencalha R, et al. Morphometry and vascularization of the rabbit kidneys (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(4): 1293–1298.
  29. Sisson S. Sistema urogenital do suíno. In: Getty R. (Ed.) Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos. 5. ed. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro 1986: 1216–1221.
  30. Souza EC, Leao Neto LF, Santos EAR, et al. Caracterización anatómica de los riñones del Zorro Pampeano (Lycalopex gymnocercus): morfometría y vasos renales. Rev Electrón Vet. 2018; 19: 1–8.
  31. Steinhardt G, Salinas-Madrigal L, Farber R, et al. Experimental Ureteral Obstruction in the Fetal Opossum. I. Renal Functional Assessment. J Urol. 1990; 144(2 Part 2): 564–566.
  32. Stocco AV, Sousa C, Gomes MS, et al. Is there a difference between the right and left kidney? A macroscopic approach in Brazilian Shorthair Cat. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2016; 68(5): 1137–1144.
  33. Ventura J, Salazar M, Pérez-Hernández R, et al. Morphometrics of the genus didelphis (didelphimorphia: didelphidae) in venezuela. J Mammal. 2002; 83(4): 1087–1096, doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<1087:motgdd>2.0.co;2.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl