open access

Vol 79, No 1 (2020)
Original article
Submitted: 2019-03-07
Accepted: 2019-04-15
Published online: 2019-05-10
Get Citation

The analysis of renal artery cross-section area and kidney volume in computed tomography angiography

A. Szczurowska1, M. Guziński1, P. Sobczyk2, J. Silicki3, M. Sąsiadek1
·
Pubmed: 31106842
·
Folia Morphol 2020;79(1):93-97.
Affiliations
  1. Department of General Radiology, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland
  2. Department of Mathematics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
  3. Department of General and Paediatric Radiology, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. M. Curie-Sklodowskiej 68, 50-369 Wroclaw, Poland

open access

Vol 79, No 1 (2020)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2019-03-07
Accepted: 2019-04-15
Published online: 2019-05-10

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between renal artery cross-section area and kidney volume with consideration of anatomical variants of renal arteries, sexual dimorphism and lateralisation. Materials and methods: Two hundred and two patients, 104 women and 98 men, aged 57.3 ± 16 years were examined using computed tomography angiography (CTA) of abdominal aorta for various reasons. The cross-section areas of renal arteries were measured automatically with a vessel tracking programme and summed up on each side in case of the presence of additional renal arteries. The kidneys were measured manually. Results: Additional renal arteries (ARA) were found in 68 (33.7%) patients. Fifty-three (77.9%) of them had one, 11 (16.2%) two and 4 (5.9%) three ARAs. Bilateral ARAs occurred in 10 cases (14.7% patients with ARA). Proximal branching of renal artery occurred in 36 (8.4%) renal arteries. The cross-section area of the largest renal artery depended on the number of ipsilateral renal arteries. Mean cross-section area of the main left renal artery was larger than on the right side (28.52 mm2 vs. 25.36 mm2, p < 0.01) in the whole analysed group. Strong sexual dimorphism in renal artery cross-section area was observed (p < 0.01) in favour of men (31.3 mm2 in men and 22.9 mm2 in women). Mean total renal artery cross-section area has positively correlated with kidney volume (p < 10–13) in both sexes with Pearson correlation value of 0.5. Conclusions: The cross-section area of renal arteries correlated positively with kidney volume in both sexes. Presence of ARAs does not influence the sum of cross-section areas of renal arteries. In case of a difference between left and right renal artery cross-section area with symmetrical kidneys, it is necessary to look for ARA.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between renal artery cross-section area and kidney volume with consideration of anatomical variants of renal arteries, sexual dimorphism and lateralisation. Materials and methods: Two hundred and two patients, 104 women and 98 men, aged 57.3 ± 16 years were examined using computed tomography angiography (CTA) of abdominal aorta for various reasons. The cross-section areas of renal arteries were measured automatically with a vessel tracking programme and summed up on each side in case of the presence of additional renal arteries. The kidneys were measured manually. Results: Additional renal arteries (ARA) were found in 68 (33.7%) patients. Fifty-three (77.9%) of them had one, 11 (16.2%) two and 4 (5.9%) three ARAs. Bilateral ARAs occurred in 10 cases (14.7% patients with ARA). Proximal branching of renal artery occurred in 36 (8.4%) renal arteries. The cross-section area of the largest renal artery depended on the number of ipsilateral renal arteries. Mean cross-section area of the main left renal artery was larger than on the right side (28.52 mm2 vs. 25.36 mm2, p < 0.01) in the whole analysed group. Strong sexual dimorphism in renal artery cross-section area was observed (p < 0.01) in favour of men (31.3 mm2 in men and 22.9 mm2 in women). Mean total renal artery cross-section area has positively correlated with kidney volume (p < 10–13) in both sexes with Pearson correlation value of 0.5. Conclusions: The cross-section area of renal arteries correlated positively with kidney volume in both sexes. Presence of ARAs does not influence the sum of cross-section areas of renal arteries. In case of a difference between left and right renal artery cross-section area with symmetrical kidneys, it is necessary to look for ARA.

Get Citation

Keywords

renal dimensions, renal vasculature, accessory renal arteries

About this article
Title

The analysis of renal artery cross-section area and kidney volume in computed tomography angiography

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 79, No 1 (2020)

Article type

Original article

Pages

93-97

Published online

2019-05-10

Page views

2766

Article views/downloads

672

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0060

Pubmed

31106842

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2020;79(1):93-97.

Keywords

renal dimensions
renal vasculature
accessory renal arteries

Authors

A. Szczurowska
M. Guziński
P. Sobczyk
J. Silicki
M. Sąsiadek

References (19)
  1. Antoniou GA, Karkos CD, Antoniou SA, et al. Can an accessory renal artery be safely covered during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013; 17(6): 1025–1027.
  2. Aytac SK, Yigit H, Sancak T, et al. Correlation between the diameter of the main renal artery and the presence of an accessory renal artery: sonographic and angiographic evaluation. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(5): 433–9; quiz 440.
  3. Bordei P, Sapte E, Iliescu D. Double renal arteries originating from the aorta. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004; 26(6): 474–479.
  4. Budhiraja V, Rastogi R, Anjankar V, et al. Supernumerary renal arteries and their embryological and clinical correlation: a cadaveric study from north India. ISRN Anat. 2013; 2013: 405712.
  5. Canyigit M, Hidiroglu M, Uguz E, et al. Iliorenal periscope graft to maintain blood flow to accessory renal artery. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015; 21(4): 334–337.
  6. Carter JT, Freise CE, McTaggart RA, et al. Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5(6): 1312–1318.
  7. Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, et al. Kidney dimensions at sonography: correlation with age, sex, and habitus in 665 adult volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160(1): 83–86.
  8. Glodny B, Rapf K, Unterholzner V, et al. Accessory or additional renal arteries show no relevant effects on the width of the upper urinary tract: a 64-slice multidetector CT study in 1072 patients with 2132 kidneys. Br J Radiol. 2011; 84(998): 145–152.
  9. Glodny B, Unterholzner V, Taferner B, et al. Normal kidney size and its influencing factors - a 64-slice MDCT study of 1.040 asymptomatic patients. BMC Urol. 2009; 9: 19.
  10. He B, Mitchell A. A novel technique for reconstruction of multiple renal arteries in live donor kidney transplantation: a case report and literature review. Transplant Proc. 2012; 44(10): 3055–3058.
  11. Id D, Kaltenbach B, Bertog SC, et al. Does the presence of accessory renal arteries affect the efficacy of renal denervation? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6(10): 1085–1091.
  12. Juluru K, Rotman JA, Masi P, et al. Semiautomated CT-based quantification of donor kidney volume applied to a predictive model of outcomes in renal transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204(5): W566–W572.
  13. Kornafel O, Baran B, Pawlikowska I, et al. Analysis of anatomical variations of the main arteries branching from the abdominal aorta, with 64-detector computed tomography. Pol J Radiol. 2010; 75(2): 38–45.
  14. Mersa B, Gürkan A, Ozçelik B, et al. Anastomosis of accessory arteries via microsurgical technique in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43(3): 819–821.
  15. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2015.
  16. Ramadan SU, Yiğit H, Gökharman D, et al. Can renal dimensions and the main renal artery diameter indicate the presence of an accessory renal artery? A 64-slice CT study. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011; 17(3): 266–271.
  17. Raza M, Hameed A, Khan MI. Ultrasonographic assessment of renal size and its correlation with body mass index in adults without known renal disease. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011; 23(3): 64–68.
  18. Tarzamni MK, Nezami N, Rashid RJ, et al. Anatomical differences in the right and left renal arterial patterns. Folia Morphol. 2008; 67(2): 104–110.
  19. Zhao XY, Tian J, Ru YH, et al. Application value of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of renal artery variation in living donor kidney transplantation. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(1): 314–322.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl