Multimedialna platforma wiedzy medycznej Internetowa Księgarnia Medyczna Kalendarium Konferencji
Folia Morphologica
MENU
Shortcuts Submit an article Author Guidelines (new) Ahead Of Print Reviewers 2023

open access

Vol 77, No 2 (2018)
Original article
Submitted: 2017-06-12
Accepted: 2017-07-24
Published online: 2017-08-30
View PDF Download PDF file
Get Citation

Incidental imaging findings of congenital rib abnormalities – a case series and review of developmental concepts

A.M. Aignătoaei1, C.E. Moldoveanu2, I.-D Căruntu1, S.E. Giușcă1, S. Partene Vicoleanu1, A.H. Nedelcu1
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2017.0080
·
Pubmed: 28868608
·
Folia Morphol 2018;77(2):386-392.
Affiliations
  1. University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  2. Pneumology Clinic Hospital, dr Iosif Cihac Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania

open access

Vol 77, No 2 (2018)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2017-06-12
Accepted: 2017-07-24
Published online: 2017-08-30

Abstract

Background: Congenital rib abnormalities are found in approximately 2% of the general population. Usually, they occur in isolation and are rarely symptomatic, but they can also be associated with other malformations.

Materials and methods: We reviewed imaging examinations performed over a period of 2 years (2014–2015), enabling us to identify isolated rib abnormalities in 6 adult patients.

Results: The case series consisted in 3 cases with bilateral cervical ribs and 1 case each with bifid rib, costal fusion and rib pseudarthrosis. In all patients, the costal anomalies were discovered incidentally. All rib malformations were detected at thoracic radiography, except for the rib pseudarthrosis, which was identified at computed tomography (CT) scan. Differential diagnosis was made between cer­vical ribs and abnormalities of the C7 transverse process and of the first rib, while the other costal malformations were distinguished from tumoural, traumatic or inflammatory lesions of the chest wall, lung and pleura. Considering the existing knowledge on rib development, we suggest a classification of the most common types of rib malformations in three categories: (I) results of homeotic transforma­tion, referring to numerical aberrations; (II) segmentation errors, including costal fusion and bridging; (III) anomalies of resegmentation, resulting in bifid ribs.

Conclusions: It is important that radiologists are familiarised with the imaging features of rib abnormalities, since these anomalies can be misinterpreted as lesions with different implications. We are convinced that the developmental classification proposed in this paper can contribute to a better understanding of this pathology. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 2: 386–392)

Abstract

Background: Congenital rib abnormalities are found in approximately 2% of the general population. Usually, they occur in isolation and are rarely symptomatic, but they can also be associated with other malformations.

Materials and methods: We reviewed imaging examinations performed over a period of 2 years (2014–2015), enabling us to identify isolated rib abnormalities in 6 adult patients.

Results: The case series consisted in 3 cases with bilateral cervical ribs and 1 case each with bifid rib, costal fusion and rib pseudarthrosis. In all patients, the costal anomalies were discovered incidentally. All rib malformations were detected at thoracic radiography, except for the rib pseudarthrosis, which was identified at computed tomography (CT) scan. Differential diagnosis was made between cer­vical ribs and abnormalities of the C7 transverse process and of the first rib, while the other costal malformations were distinguished from tumoural, traumatic or inflammatory lesions of the chest wall, lung and pleura. Considering the existing knowledge on rib development, we suggest a classification of the most common types of rib malformations in three categories: (I) results of homeotic transforma­tion, referring to numerical aberrations; (II) segmentation errors, including costal fusion and bridging; (III) anomalies of resegmentation, resulting in bifid ribs.

Conclusions: It is important that radiologists are familiarised with the imaging features of rib abnormalities, since these anomalies can be misinterpreted as lesions with different implications. We are convinced that the developmental classification proposed in this paper can contribute to a better understanding of this pathology. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 2: 386–392)

Full Text:

View PDF Download PDF file
Get Citation

Keywords

rib malformations, classification, homeotic transformation, segmentation, resegmentation

About this article
Title

Incidental imaging findings of congenital rib abnormalities – a case series and review of developmental concepts

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 77, No 2 (2018)

Article type

Original article

Pages

386-392

Published online

2017-08-30

Page views

1977

Article views/downloads

8452

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2017.0080

Pubmed

28868608

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2018;77(2):386-392.

Keywords

rib malformations
classification
homeotic transformation
segmentation
resegmentation

Authors

A.M. Aignătoaei
C.E. Moldoveanu
I.-D Căruntu
S.E. Giușcă
S. Partene Vicoleanu
A.H. Nedelcu

References (31)
  1. Aulehla A, Pourquié O. Signaling gradients during paraxial mesoderm development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2(2): a000869.
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Aoyama H, Asamoto K. The developmental fate of the rostral/caudal half of a somite for vertebra and rib formation: experimental confirmation of the resegmentation theory using chick-quail chimeras. Mech Dev. 2000; 99(1-2): 71–82.
    PubMed
  3. Basarslan F, Bayarogulları H, Tutanc M, et al. Intrathoracic rib associated with pulmonary collapse in a pediatric patient. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(4): 220–222.
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Bots J, Wijnaendts LCD, Delen S, et al. Analysis of cervical ribs in a series of human fetuses. J Anat. 2011; 219(3): 403–409.
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. Castriota-Scanderbeg A, Dallapiccola B. Abnormal Skeletal Phenotypes: From Simple Signs to Complex Diagnoses. Springer, New York. 2005: 124–144.
  6. Cosson MA, Breton S, Aprahamian A, et al. [Unusual presentation of rib malformation]. Arch Pediatr. 2012; 19(11): 1208–1211.
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. Gindes L, Benoit B, Pretorius DH, et al. Abnormal number of fetal ribs on 3-dimensional ultrasonography: associated anomalies and outcomes in 75 fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2008; 27(9): 1263–1271.
    PubMed
  8. Glass RBJ, Norton KI, Mitre SA, et al. Pediatric ribs: a spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics. 2002; 22(1): 87–104.
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Gupta V, Suri RK, Rath G. Synostosis of first and second thoracic ribs: Anatomical and radiological assessment. IJAV. 2009; 2: 131–133.
  10. Guttentag AR, Salwen JK. Keep your eyes on the ribs: the spectrum of normal variants and diseases that involve the ribs. Radiographics. 1999; 19(5): 1125–1142.
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Hershkovitz R. Prenatal diagnosis of isolated abnormal number of ribs. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 32(4): 506–509.
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. Kaneko H, Kitoh H, Mabuchi A, et al. Isolated bifid rib: clinical and radiological findings in children. Pediatr Int. 2012; 54(6): 820–823.
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Kirschbaum A, Palade E, Csatari Z, et al. Venous thoracic outlet syndrome caused by a congenital rib malformation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012; 15(2): 328–329.
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. Kryger M, Kosiak W, Batko T. Bifid rib — usefulness of chest ultrasound. A case report. J Ultrason. 2013; 13(55): 446–450.
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. Leong SC, Karkos PD. A "hard" neck lump. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50(4): e141–e142.
    PubMed
  16. Li Z, Kawasumi M, Zhao B, et al. Transgenic over-expression of growth differentiation factor 11 propeptide in skeleton results in transformation of the seventh cervical vertebra into a thoracic vertebra. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010; 77(11): 990–997.
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. Mahajan PS, Hasan IA, Ahamad N, et al. A unique case of left second supernumerary and left third bifid intrathoracic ribs with block vertebrae and hypoplastic left lung. Case Rep Radiol. 2013; 2013: 620120.
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Mallo M, Vinagre T, Carapuço M. The road to the vertebral formula. Int J Dev Biol. 2009; 53(8-10): 1469–1481.
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Merks JHM, Smets AM, Van Rijn RR, et al. Prevalence of rib anomalies in normal Caucasian children and childhood cancer patients. Eur J Med Genet. 2005; 48(2): 113–129.
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. Morimoto M, Kiso M, Sasaki N, et al. Cooperative Mesp activity is required for normal somitogenesis along the anterior-posterior axis. Dev Biol. 2006; 300(2): 687–698.
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Nunes FD, de Almeida FC, Tucci R, et al. Homeobox genes: a molecular link between development and cancer. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003; 17(1): 94–98.
    PubMed
  22. Reidler JS, Das De S, Schreiber JJ, et al. Thoracic outlet syndrome caused by synostosis of the first and second thoracic ribs: 2 case reports and review of the literature. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(12): 2444–2447.
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. Song WC, Kim SH, Park DK, et al. Bifid rib: anatomical considerations in three cases. Yonsei Med J. 2009; 50(2): 300–303.
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Stevenson RE, Hall JG. Human malformations and related anomalies, second edition. Oxford, New York. 2005: 812–813.
  25. Takahashi Yu, Yasuhiko Y, Takahashi J, et al. Metameric pattern of intervertebral disc/vertebral body is generated independently of Mesp2/Ripply-mediated rostro-caudal patterning of somites in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 2013; 380(2): 172–184.
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. Tyl RW, Chernoff N, Rogers JM. Altered axial skeletal development. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2007; 80(6): 451–472.
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Viertel VG, Intrapiromkul J, Maluf F, et al. Cervical ribs: a common variant overlooked in CT imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(11): 2191–2194.
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Walden MJ, Adin ME, Visagan R, et al. Cervical ribs: identification on MRI and clinical relevance. Clin Imaging. 2013; 37(5): 938–941.
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. Wattanasirichaigoon D, Prasad C, Schneider G, et al. Rib defects in patterns of multiple malformations: a retrospective review and phenotypic analysis of 47 cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2003; 122A(1): 63–69.
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. Wellik DM, Capecchi MR. Hox10 and Hox11 genes are required to globally pattern the mammalian skeleton. Science. 2003; 301(5631): 363–367.
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. Yochum TR, Rowe LJ. 2005. Essentials of skeletal radiology, third edition. Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005: 291-293. : 319–324.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl