Vol 83, No 1 (2024): Folia Morphologica
Original article
Published online: 2023-03-02

open access

Page views 744
Article views/downloads 855
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Analysis of the regional anatomy of the retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery and surrounding structures

Shigeyuki Esumi1, Yoshihiro Kumagai1, Yoshikazu Koba1, Takaichi Fukuda1
Pubmed: 36896645
Folia Morphol 2024;83(1):44-52.

Abstract

Background: The retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (RRSA) is a congenital anomalous branching of the arch of the aorta. Because its incidence is very low, it has not been fully understood how the RRSA develops during embryogenesis, and thus accumulation of observed findings in newly found cases is important to elucidate the aetiology of the RRSA.

Materials and methods: We encountered a case of the RRSA during the course of gross anatomy dissection for medical students.

Results: The main findings in the present observations are that (a) the RRSA arose from the right side wall of the arch of the aorta as its last branch; (b) the detected RRSA was directed to the right and upward between the oesophagus and vertebral column; (c) the right vertebral artery branched from the RRSA and entered the sixth cervical foramen transversarium; (d) the suprema intercostal artery branched from the costocervical trunk on both sides and its distal branches were distributed to the first and second intercostal spaces; and (e) both sides of bronchial arteries originated from the thoracic aorta.

Conclusions: The present study gives further information about the morphological details of the RRSA leading to better understanding of its developmental process.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Folia Morphol.

Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 44–52

DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2023.0017

Copyright © 2024 Via Medica

ISSN 0015–5659

eISSN 1644–3284

journals.viamedica.pl

Analysis of the regional anatomy of the retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery and surrounding structures

Shigeyuki Esumi*Yoshihiro Kumagai*Yoshikazu KobaTakaichi Fukuda
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan

[Received: 24 January 2023; Accepted: 1 March 2023; Early publication date: 2 March 2023]

Address for correspondence: Dr. Shigeyuki Esumi, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan, e-mail: esumi@kumamoto-u.ac.jp

*Authors with equal contribution to this work.

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Background: The retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (RRSA) is a congenital anomalous branching of the arch of the aorta. Because its incidence is very low, it has not been fully understood how the RRSA develops during embryogenesis, and thus accumulation of observed findings in newly found cases is important to elucidate the aetiology of the RRSA.
Materials and methods: We encountered a case of the RRSA during the course of gross anatomy dissection for medical students.
Results: The main findings in the present observations are that (a) the RRSA arose from the right side wall of the arch of the aorta as its last branch; (b) the detected RRSA was directed to the right and upward between the oesophagus and vertebral column; (c) the right vertebral artery branched from the RRSA and entered the sixth cervical foramen transversarium; (d) the suprema intercostal artery branched from the costocervical trunk on both sides and its distal branches were distributed to the first and second intercostal spaces; and (e) both sides of bronchial arteries originated from the thoracic aorta.
Conclusions: The present study gives further information about the morphological details of the RRSA leading to better understanding of its developmental process. (Folia Morphol 2024; 83, 1: 44–52)
Key words: gross anatomy, arteria lusoria, bronchial artery, dorsal aorta, non-recurrent laryngeal nerve

INTRODUCTION

Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA), also named the arteria lusoria, is an embryologically derived rare variations of aortic arch branching that arises directly from the aortic arch as fourth branch. The reported incidence of ARSA ranges from 0.2% to 1.6% in Japanese [2, 9, 10, 13, 14, 23, 26] and 0.2% to 4.4% of population in other countries [1, 3–5, 7, 11, 12, 15, 19–22, 24, 25, 27, 28]. The retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (RRSA) is one of the variations of ARSA. RRSA, is an embryological variation that can be detected as the terminal branch of the arch of the aorta passing dorsal to the oesophagus and taking a course toward the right axilla as the usual subclavian artery. The RRSA has been thought to be part of the right dorsal aorta that is normally eliminated by birth. It has been reported that ~80% of ARSA crosses behind the oesophagus [3, 12] as RRSA. Here we report a case of RRSA encountered in student dissection at Kumamoto University School of Medicine during the period from 2018 to 2022. According to previous studies, the general idea about the origin of RRSA is that it develops from the regression of the embryotic fourth aortic arch and a portion of the right dorsal aorta cranial to the seventh intersegmental artery, accompanied with the persistence of the normally regressed segment of the right dorsal aorta caudal to the seventh intersegmental artery. However, the pattern of elimination and persistence of the components of the aortic arch complex is not always the same, showing some inconformity with the influential idea [13]. Thus, the traditional view of the process of RRSA development should be reconsidered based upon detailed observations and analysis of the regional anatomy including branches of RRSA and surrounding structures. Because the incidence of RRSA is very low, it is worth examining how morphological details of the newly found case in the present study can be related to findings in previous observations. Moreover, close observations of this anomaly can give useful knowledge for certain clinical applications such as possible defect of the right recurrent nerve that often accompanies the RRSA and thus requires careful manipulations of cervical structures during surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The RRSA was found in a donated cadaver of a 62-year-old Japanese male, who had died from kidney cancer, during routine medical student gross anatomy dissection at Kumamoto University School of Medicine. The incidence was 0.7% (1/141 bodies studied from 2018 to 2022). The cadaver was injected with 10% formalin solution from the radial artery by gravity flow and preserved in 30% alcohol. This anomalous case was observed carefully and sketched in detail, and three-dimensional photographs were taken. The protocol for this study did not include any specific issue needed to be approved by Ethics Committee of Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, and the study conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki in 1995 (as revised in Fortaleza 2013).

RESULTS

The origin of the RRSA

The RRSA arose from the right side of the most distal part of the arch of the aorta as its fourth branch, following bifurcations of the right common carotid, left common carotid, and left subclavian artery (Figs. 1–6). The RRSA emerged from the arch of the aorta at the level of the third thoracic vertebra. The diameter of the RRSA in its proximal part and that of the left subclavian artery were 2 cm and 1 cm, respectively (Figs. 3, 4). The RRSA was initially directed to the right and upward, passing through the space between the oesophagus and the vertebral column of the level from the second to the third thoracic vertebrae. Thereafter, the RRSA extended to the right side of the oesophagus (Figs. 5, 6). There was no Kommerell diverticulum that was previously described in the proximal part of RRSA [10, 29]. We considered this case as Adachi’s G-type [2].

Figure 1. Cross-vision stereophotographs of a case of retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery; A. Right anterior view of cervix and mediastinum with retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (asterisk); B. The superior vena cava is pulled above, and the right vagus nerve is held by tweezer; AA — arch of aorta; Az — azygos vein; Es — oesophagus; PN — phrenic nerve; RCC — right common carotid artery; SVC — superior vena cava; Tr — trachea.
Figure 2. A schematic drawing of the retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (asterisk) and branches of the arch of the aorta after removal of lungs and heart; AA — arch of aorta; Az — azygos vein; CN — cervical nerve; Co — costa; DS — dorsal scapular artery; Es — oesophagus; LBc — left brachiocephalic vein; NRLN — non-recurrent laryngeal nerve; PN — phrenic nerve; RBc — right brachiocephalic vein; RCC — right common carotid artery; SL — superior laryngeal nerve; Ss — suprascapular artery; ST — sympathetic trunk; Tc — thyrocervical trunk; TG — thyroid gland; Tr — trachea; Ve — vertebral artery; X — vagus nerve.
Figure 3. Cross-vision stereophotograph showing the overview of the retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (RRSA) (asterisk). The arch of the aorta is pulled to the left for observation of the whole RRSA. Lungs, oesophagus, heart, and trachea were removed; Az — azygos vein; TA — thoracic aorta; TD — thoracic duct.
Figure 4. A schematic drawing of the whole retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (asterisk) arising from the arch of the aorta as its last branch. Lungs, oesophagus, heart, and trachea were removed for demonstration; Az — azygos vein; CN — cervical nerve; Co — costa; CV — cervical vertebra; DS — dorsal scapular artery; IT — internal thoracic artery; LSc — left subclavian artery; SA — scalenus anterior; ST — sympathetic trunk; TA — thoracic aorta; TD — thoracic duct; TN — thoracic nerve; TV — thoracic vertebra; Ve — vertebral artery.
Figure 5. Cross-vision stereophotograph of left and right bronchial arteries (dot) arising from the thoracic aorta in the present case having the retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery. Three lines drawn to the white dot represents bronchial arteries; AA — arch of aorta; Es — oesophagus; SVC — superior vena cava; TG — thyroid gland; Tr — trachea; X — vagus nerve.
Figure 6. A schematic drawing of right and left bronchial arteries (dots), cervical structure and mediastinum in this retro-oesophageal right subclavian artery (asterisk) case. One of the two right bronchial arteries branches from the thoracic aorta. Another right bronchial artery is bifurcated from a trunk that is branched from the thoracic aorta and gives rise to two left bronchial arteries. Arrow represents the branch that is anastomosed with the branches of the left gastric artery; AA — arch of aorta; Co — costa; Es — oesophagus; LCC — left common carotid artery; RCC — right common carotid artery; SA — scalenus anterior; ST — sympathetic trunk; SVC — superior vena cava; TG — thyroid gland; Tr — trachea; X — vagus nerve.
Branches of the RRSA

The right vertebral artery and the right costocervical trunk were branches of the RRSA in the present case. The right vertebral artery entered the cervical foramen transversarium of the sixth cervical vertebra, whereas the left vertebral artery arising from the left subclavian artery entered the fifth cervical foramen transversarium (Figs. 3, 4). Both of the thyrocervical trunk and the internal thoracic artery branched off from the RRSA just before it passed through the scalene space (Fig. 4). The right dorsal scapular artery branched from the RRSA at the position deep to the scalenus anterior muscle. The artery then passed under the C7 nerve root, became located dorsal to the C5–C6 nerve root (superior trunk of the brachial plexus), and reached the position medial to the border of the levator scapulae and serratus anterior muscles before entering the deep muscle layer (Figs. 2, 4). The suprascapular artery branched from the RRSA in the so-called third part of the subclavian artery at the inferior edge of the first costa (Fig. 2). This artery passed anterior to the C5–C6 nerve root and posterior to a thin branch accompanying the superior trunk, then it entered the suprascapular notch. The RRSA followed the expected path as a right axillary artery.

The highest posterior intercostal artery arising from the thoracic aorta

The suprema intercostal artery branched from the costocervical trunk on both sides and bifurcated into the first and second intercostal arteries. The third and fourth posterior intercostal arteries arose from the thoracic aorta as a common trunk of the highest posterior intercostal artery on both sides (Figs. 3, 4).

The right bronchial artery arising from the thoracic aorta

The bronchial arteries branched from the right anterior part of the thoracic aorta, located distal to the RRSA branching point, at the level of the fourth thoracic vertebra. It then extended toward the anterior hilum of the lung, along with the right main bronchus. Another bronchial artery that was also directed to the hilum of the right lung originated from the caudal common trunk that arose from the anterior surface of the thoracic aorta at the position 3.5 cm distal to the bifurcation of the first bronchial artery. Then, this caudal common trunk bifurcated into two branches (rostral and caudal). The rostral branch further divided into two distal branches, which were directed toward to the hilum of the left lung, taking the course along the ventral and dorsal walls of the left main bronchus. The caudal branch of the common trunk also bifurcated into two distal branches. The rostral bronchial artery that above mentioned extended to the right direction, passing between the left main bronchus and the oesophagus and further along the dorsal wall of the right main bronchus. It finally reached the hilum of the right lung. The other branch descended anteriorly and passed through the oesophageal hiatus. Finally, it connected with a branch of the left gastric artery.

The thoracic duct

The thoracic duct ascended between the thoracic aorta and the azygos vein, passed dorsal to the RRSA and ventral to the left vertebral artery/vein (Figs. 3, 4). Finally, it reached the left venous angle by passing through the usual route between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery.

Non-recurrent laryngeal nerve

The recurrent laryngeal nerve is a branch of the vagus nerve. The right recurrent laryngeal nerve loops under the subclavian artery and supplies to larynx. Non-recurrent laryngeal inferior nerve (NRLN) is a very rare anatomic variation that originates from the vagus nerve and directly provides the branch to the larynx. It has been reported that the NRLN is related to vascular anomalies of the branches of the arch of aorta. The right vagus nerve descended with the right common carotid artery and branched directly into the larynx without recurrence (NRLN) in RRSA [8, 17, 18, 30]. In the normal developmental process, the persistence of right fourth aortic arch leads to the recurrence of the laryngeal nerve of this level. In contrast, the laryngeal branch of the vagus nerve becomes directly connected to the larynx when the right fourth aortic arch disappears in RRSA [8, 17, 18, 30]. In this case, the right vagus nerve branched into the NRLN at the level of the sixth cervical vertebra (Figs. 1, 7). On the left side of the present material, a typical recurrent laryngeal nerve was observed. Our observations are consistent to previous finding and support the hypothesis.

Figure 7. A case of non-recurrent laryngeal nerve on the right side; A. Right non-recurrent laryngeal nerve is shown by arrow; B. Left recurrent laryngeal nerve (arrow), held by tweezer, is taking a usual course passing dorsal beneath the aortic arch; AA — arch of aorta; RCC — right common carotid artery; RCC — right common carotid artery; TG — thyroid gland.

DISCUSSION

This study describes the morphology of the RRSA and its associated structures. Because RRSA is a rare anomaly, accumulation of findings in newly found cases will lead to better understanding of the process of forming RRSA. Previous studies have suggested that the proximal part of the RRSA is the persistent of the distal part of the right dorsal aorta, whereas the fourth aortic arch of the right side, which usually remains in the proximal part of the right subclavian artery, is eliminated during the genesis of the RRSA. However, the fourth right aortic arch persists in some RRSA cases [13]. This variability is associated with the morphological variation of the right vertebral artery in two ways: one is the position of branching from the parent artery and the other is the level of the cervical foramen transversarium to which the right vertebral artery is introduced. In the present case, the right vertebral artery arose from the right subclavian artery and entered the foramen at the sixth cervical vertebra as in usual cases. In the previous study focusing this issue [13], three out of five RRSA cases also showed the same pattern (Case No. 2, 3, 4). In these three cases, both the fourth aortic arch and part of right dorsal aorta cranial to the seventh intersegmental artery are thought to be eliminated during the developmental process, and this is in conformity with the traditional view of the process of RRSA genesis. However, in Case No. 1 and 5 of the same study, the right vertebral artery arose from not RRSA but the right common carotid artery [13]. Moreover, the right vertebral artery entered the foramen at the fourth cervical vertebra in both cases; the foramen of the fifth vertebra was also targeted in Case No. 5. The patterns in these two cases can be interpreted as the result of the persistence of the fourth aortic arch and some cranial portion of the right dorsal aorta, which violates the traditional view. The vasculature morphology in the present case corresponds to the pattern in Case No. 2, 3, 4 mentioned above. The observation in another study also revealed a similar pattern regarding the right vertebral artery arising from the RRSA [23]. Because the number of the bodies analysed is rather small, it is uncertain whether disappearance of the fourth aortic arch, as suggested by the present case, is the dominant form of the RRSA. Judging from the previous observations of multiple cases in which the fourth aortic arch persists, it can at least be said that the theory regarding the mechanism of generating the RRSA needs to be modified to explain heterogeneous vasculature patterns in a consistent manner, which might also give perspective to understand the morphogenesis of aortic arches and related arteries in both normal and variant cases.

Because information about the morphology of bronchial arteries in RRSA is limited in previous studies of RRSA, we concentrated on them in this report. It has been reported that 97% of left bronchial arteries originate from the thoracic aorta, whereas the right posterior intercostal artery supplies 89% of the right bronchial artery [6, 16]. In the study of the RRSA, the right posterior intercostal artery was the origin of the right bronchial artery in four out of five cases, whereas the RRSA was the origin of the right bronchial artery in the remaining one case [13]. It was postulated there that branching of the bronchial artery, which can be the visceral branch of the aorta, from the RRSA is compatible with the traditional view that the most proximal part of the RRSA is derived from the dorsal aorta of the right side. It should be noted here that the origin of the right bronchial artery in the present case was neither the posterior intercostal artery nor the RRSA: the right bronchus was targeted by two branches of the thoracic aorta.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report suggests that there is a variability regarding the vascular pattern in structures surrounding the RRSA that can become the origin of the right bronchial artery. This also suggests the necessity of further study to reconsider the mechanism of RRSA development by accumulating findings in this anomaly in future studies.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind’s overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude.

We would like to thank Dr. Katsushi Kawai for giving us a lot of advice.

Conflict of interest: None declared

REFERENCES

  1. Abhaichand RK, Louvard Y, Gobeil JF, et al. The problem of arteria lusoria in right transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001; 54(2): 196–201, doi: 10.1002/ccd.1266, indexed in Pubmed: 11590683.
  2. Adachi B. Das Arteriensystem der Japaner, Bd.1. Maruzen, Kyoto 1928: 35–41.
  3. Alghamdi MA, Al-Eitan LN, Elsy B, et al. Aberrant right subclavian artery in a cadaver: a case report of an aortic arch anomaly. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(3): 726–729, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0081, indexed in Pubmed: 32748949.
  4. De Luca L, Bergman JJ, Tytgat GN, et al. EUS imaging of the arteria lusoria: case series and review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 52(5): 670–673, doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.109808, indexed in Pubmed: 11060196.
  5. Dong S, Alarhayem AQ, Meier G, et al. Contemporary management and natural history of aberrant right subclavian artery. J Vasc Surg. 2022; 75(4): 1343–1348.e2, doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.051, indexed in Pubmed: 34838611.
  6. Fei QL, Zhou YY, Yuan YX, et al. An applied anatomical study of bronchial artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40(1): 55–61, doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1918-8, indexed in Pubmed: 28942519.
  7. Haesemeyer SW, Gavant ML. Imaging of acute traumatic aortic tear in patients with an aberrant right subclavian artery. Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(1): 117–120, doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888750, indexed in Pubmed: 9888750.
  8. Henry BM, Sanna S, Graves MJ, et al. The non-recurrent laryngeal nerve: a meta-analysis and clinical considerations. Peer J. 2017; 5: e3012, doi: 10.7717/peerj.3012, indexed in Pubmed: 28344898.
  9. Iimura A, Oguchi T, Tou M, et al. The retroesophageal right subclavian artery - A case report and review. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2017; 94(3): 75–80, doi: 10.2535/ofaj.94.75, indexed in Pubmed: 29681591.
  10. Ito T, Itoh A, Kiyoshima D, et al. Anatomical characteristics of two cases of aberrant right subclavian artery. Anat Sci Int. 2022; 97(4): 423–427, doi: 10.1007/s12565-022-00658-7, indexed in Pubmed: 35316514.
  11. Jahangeer S, Bashir M, Harky A, et al. Aberrant subclavian: new face of an old disease. J Vis Surg. 2018; 4: 108, doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.05.11, indexed in Pubmed: 29963397.
  12. Kau T, Sinzig M, Gasser J, et al. Aortic development and anomalies. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007; 24(2): 141–152, doi: 10.1055/s-2007-980040, indexed in Pubmed: 21326792.
  13. Kawai K, Honma S, Kumagai Y, et al. A schematic diagram showing the various components of the embryonic aortic arch complex in the retroesophageal right subclavian artery. Anat Sci Int. 2011; 86(3): 135–145, doi: 10.1007/s12565-010-0101-7, indexed in Pubmed: 21246420.
  14. Kawashima T, Sasaki H. Topological changes of the human autonomic cardiac nervous system in individuals with a retroesophageal right subclavian artery: two case reports and a brief review. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005; 210(4): 327–334, doi: 10.1007/s00429-005-0052-2, indexed in Pubmed: 16222543.
  15. Kelly MD. Endoscopy and the aberrant right subclavian artery. Am Surg. 2007; 73(12): 1259–1261, indexed in Pubmed: 18186385.
  16. Kodama K. Bronchial artery. In: Anatomic Variations in Japanese. In: Sato T, Akita K (eds) (in Japanese). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo 2000: 237–239 .
  17. Lee JY, Won DY, Oh SH, et al. Three concurrent variations of the aberrant right subclavian artery, the non-recurrent laryngeal nerve and the right thoracic duct. Folia Morphol. 2016; 75(4): 560–564, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0025, indexed in Pubmed: 27830894.
  18. Lu Y, Deng C, Lan N, et al. The nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve without abnormal subclavian artery: report of two cases and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 [Epub ahead of print]: 1455613211056547, doi: 10.1177/01455613211056547, indexed in Pubmed: 34935547.
  19. Mirande MH, Durhman MR, Smith HF. Anatomic investigation of two cases of aberrant right subclavian artery syndrome, including the effects on external vascular dimensions. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(8), doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080592, indexed in Pubmed: 32823848.
  20. Natsis K, Didagelos M, Gkiouliava A, et al. The aberrant right subclavian artery: cadaveric study and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 39(5): 559–565, doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1796-5, indexed in Pubmed: 27999944.
  21. Natsis KI, Tsitouridis IA, Didagelos MV, et al. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: clinical significance and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(5): 319–323, doi: 10.1007/s00276-008-0442-2, indexed in Pubmed: 19034377.
  22. Nie B, Zhou Yj, Li Gz, et al. Clinical study of arterial anatomic variations for transradial coronary procedure in Chinese population. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009; 122(18): 2097–2102, indexed in Pubmed: 19781291.
  23. Okamoto K, Wakebe T, Saiki K, et al. A case of retroesophageal right subclavian artery, with special reference to the second intercostal artery, retroesophageal right vertebral artery, and thoracic duct. Anat Sci Int. 2013; 88(4): 234–238, doi: 10.1007/s12565-013-0178-x, indexed in Pubmed: 23677877.
  24. Ostrowski P, Bonczar M, Przybycień W, et al. An aberrant right subclavian artery in a 63-year-old male cadaver. Folia Morphol. 2023; 82(3): 726–731, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2022.0085, indexed in Pubmed: 36178279.
  25. Polguj M, Chrzanowski Ł, Kasprzak JD, et al. The aberrant right subclavian artery (arteria lusoria): the morphological and clinical aspects of one of the most important variations--a systematic study of 141 reports. Scientific World J. 2014; 2014: 292734, doi: 10.1155/2014/292734, indexed in Pubmed: 25105156.
  26. Saito T, Tamatsukuri Y, Hitosugi T, et al. Three cases of retroesophageal right subclavian artery. J Nippon Med Sch. 2005; 72(6): 375–382, doi: 10.1272/jnms.72.375, indexed in Pubmed: 16415518.
  27. Sangam MR, Anasuya K. Arch of aorta with bi-carotid trunk, left subclavian artery, and retroesophageal right subclavian artery. Folia Morphol. 2010; 69(3): 184–186, indexed in Pubmed: 21154291.
  28. Tallarita T, Rogers RT, Bower TC, et al. Characterization and surgical management of aberrant subclavian arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2023; 77(4): 1006–1015, doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.018, indexed in Pubmed: 36565775.
  29. van Son JA, Konstantinov IE, Burckhard F. Kommerell and Kommerell’s diverticulum. Tex Heart Inst J. 2002; 29(2): 109–112, indexed in Pubmed: 12075866.
  30. Wang Yu, Ji Q, Li D, et al. Preoperative CT diagnosis of right nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve. Head Neck. 2011; 33(2): 232–238, doi: 10.1002/hed.21434, indexed in Pubmed: 20848443.