open access

Vol 81, No 4 (2022)
Review article
Submitted: 2021-09-21
Accepted: 2021-10-21
Published online: 2021-11-09
Get Citation

Carpal tunnel syndrome: state-of-the-art review

K. Osiak1, P. Elnazir2, J. A. Walocha2, A. Pasternak21
·
Pubmed: 34783004
·
Folia Morphol 2022;81(4):851-862.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Professor W. Orlowski Memorial Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
  2. Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland

open access

Vol 81, No 4 (2022)
REVIEW ARTICLES
Submitted: 2021-09-21
Accepted: 2021-10-21
Published online: 2021-11-09

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment encountered worldwide. The aetiology can be related to repetitive exposure to vibrations or forceful angular motions, genetic predisposition, injury and specific conditions, such as diabetes, pregnancy and morbid obesity. This entity is observed with increased frequency in females and the elderly. The diagnosis is largely clinical and suspected when patients present with typical symptoms such as numbness, tingling, nocturnal paraesthesia and/or neuritic “pins-and-needles” pain in the radial 3.5 digits. Certain provocative manoeuvres can be employed to evoke the symptoms of the disease to guide the diagnosis. Further testing such as electrodiagnostic studies, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging is required in the case of diagnostic uncertainty or if there is a need for objective evaluation whether or not more invasive surgical intervention is required. If the presenting symptoms are mild and discontinuous, non-surgical measures are indicated. However, if the symptoms are moderate to severe, further testing modalities such as nerve conduction studies or needle electromyography are used to determine whether carpal tunnel syndrome is acute or chronic. If significant evidence of axonal injury is identified, surgical treatment may be indicated. Surgical release of the carpal tunnel has evolved over time to become the most common hand surgery procedure.

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment encountered worldwide. The aetiology can be related to repetitive exposure to vibrations or forceful angular motions, genetic predisposition, injury and specific conditions, such as diabetes, pregnancy and morbid obesity. This entity is observed with increased frequency in females and the elderly. The diagnosis is largely clinical and suspected when patients present with typical symptoms such as numbness, tingling, nocturnal paraesthesia and/or neuritic “pins-and-needles” pain in the radial 3.5 digits. Certain provocative manoeuvres can be employed to evoke the symptoms of the disease to guide the diagnosis. Further testing such as electrodiagnostic studies, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging is required in the case of diagnostic uncertainty or if there is a need for objective evaluation whether or not more invasive surgical intervention is required. If the presenting symptoms are mild and discontinuous, non-surgical measures are indicated. However, if the symptoms are moderate to severe, further testing modalities such as nerve conduction studies or needle electromyography are used to determine whether carpal tunnel syndrome is acute or chronic. If significant evidence of axonal injury is identified, surgical treatment may be indicated. Surgical release of the carpal tunnel has evolved over time to become the most common hand surgery procedure.

Get Citation

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome, entrapment neuropathy, median nerve, open carpal tunnel release

About this article
Title

Carpal tunnel syndrome: state-of-the-art review

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 81, No 4 (2022)

Article type

Review article

Pages

851-862

Published online

2021-11-09

Page views

11039

Article views/downloads

7380

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2021.0121

Pubmed

34783004

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2022;81(4):851-862.

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome
entrapment neuropathy
median nerve
open carpal tunnel release

Authors

K. Osiak
P. Elnazir
J. A. Walocha
A. Pasternak

References (85)
  1. Ahcan U, Arnez ZM, Bajrović F, et al. Surgical technique to reduce scar discomfort after carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2002; 27(5): 821–827.
  2. Alanazy MH. Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: approach and pitfalls. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2017; 22(3): 169–180.
  3. Amadio PC. The first carpal tunnel release? J Hand Surg Br. 1995; 20(1): 40–41.
  4. Andreu JL, Ly-Pen D, Millán I, et al. Local injection versus surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: neurophysiologic outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125(7): 1479–1484.
  5. Ashworth NL, Bland JDP, Marshall S, et al. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; 48(4): CD001554–126.
  6. Athlani L, Haloua JP. Strickland's hypothenar fat pad flap for revision surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: Prospective study of 34 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2017; 36(3): 202–207.
  7. Atroshi I, Tadjerbashi K, McCabe SJ, et al. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with wrist splinting: study protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2019; 20(1): 531.
  8. Bland JDP. Carpal tunnel syndrome. BMJ. 2007; 335(7615): 343–346.
  9. Boeckstyns ME, Sørensen AI. Does endoscopic carpal tunnel release have a higher rate of complications than open carpal tunnel release? An analysis of published series. J Hand Surg Br. 1999; 24(1): 9–15.
  10. Boya H, Özcan Ö, Özteki N HH. Long-term complications of open carpal tunnel release. Muscle Nerve. 2008; 38(5): 1443–1446.
  11. Chandra PS, Singh PK, Goyal V, et al. Early versus delayed endoscopic surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective randomized study. World Neurosurg. 2013; 79(5-6): 767–772.
  12. Chen L, Duan X, Huang X, et al. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel decompression. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134(4): 585–593.
  13. Cheng CJ, Mackinnon-Patterson B, Beck JL, et al. Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33(9): 1518–1524.
  14. Cheung K, Klausmeyer MA, Jupiter JB. Abductor digiti minimi flap for vascularized coverage in the surgical management of complex regional pain syndrome following carpal tunnel release. Hand (N Y). 2017; 12(6): 546–550.
  15. Crnković T, Bilić R, Trkulja V, et al. The effect of epineurotomy on the median nerve volume after the carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(9): 1885–1892.
  16. Dengler J, Stephens JD, Bamberger HB, et al. Mimickers of carpal tunnel syndrome. JBJS Rev. 2020; 8(2): e0087.
  17. Dickinson JC, Kleinert JM. Acute carpal-tunnel syndrome caused by a calcified median artery. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(4): 610–611.
  18. Donnelly JP, Hanna M, Sperry BW, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a potential early, red-flag sign of amyloidosis. J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44(10): 868–876.
  19. Duncan S, Bhate O, Mustaly H. Pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Related Median Neuropathies. 2017: 13–29.
  20. Elsaftawy A, Gworys B, Jabłecki J, et al. "Dangerous" anatomic varieties of recurrent motor branch of median nerve. Pol Przegl Chir. 2013; 85(8): 419–423.
  21. Ferry S, Pritchard T, Keenan J, et al. Estimating the prevalence of delayed median nerve conduction in the general population. Br J Rheumatol. 1998; 37(6): 630–635.
  22. Foulkes GD, Atkinson RE, Beuchel C, et al. Outcome following epineurotomy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19(4): 539–547.
  23. Fowler JR. Nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome: gold standard or unnecessary evil? Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3): 141–142.
  24. Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(4): 1089–1094.
  25. Franklin GM, Friedman AS. Work-Related carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis and treatment guideline. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015; 26(3): 523–537.
  26. Gerritsen AAM, de Vet HCW, Scholten RJ, et al. Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288(10): 1245–1251.
  27. Gillig JD, White SD, Rachel JN. Acute carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of current literature. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016; 47(3): 599–607.
  28. Goldberg G, Zeckser JM, Mummaneni R, et al. Electrosonodiagnosis in carpal tunnel syndrome: a proposed diagnostic algorithm based on an analytic literature review. PM R. 2016; 8(5): 463–474.
  29. Huynh MNQ, Karir A, Bennett A. Scratch collapse test for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6(9): e1933.
  30. Iskra T, Mizia E, Musial A, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: anatomical and clinical correlations. Folia Med Cracov. 2013; 53(2): 5–13.
  31. Ismatullah I. Local steroid injection or carpal tunnel release for carpal tunnel syndrome: Which is more effective? J Postgrad Med Inst. 2013; 27(2): 194–199.
  32. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, et al. Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2002; 58(11): 1589–1592.
  33. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, et al. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: Summary statement. Muscle Nerve. 2002; 25(6): 918–922.
  34. Jarvik JG, Comstock BA, Kliot M, et al. Surgery versus non-surgical therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomised parallel-group trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9695): 1074–1081.
  35. Kahn LC, Yee A, Mackinnon SE. Important details in performing and interpreting the scratch collapse test. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141(2): 399–407.
  36. Kim PT, Lee HJ, Kim TG, et al. Current approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014; 6(3): 253–257.
  37. Krześniak NE, Noszczyk BH. Autologous fat transfer in secondary carpal tunnel release. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3(5): e401.
  38. Krzesniak NE, Sarnowska A, Figiel-Dabrowska A, et al. Secondary release of the peripheral nerve with autologous fat derivates benefits for functional and sensory recovery. Neural Regen Res. 2021; 16(5): 856–864.
  39. Kumari A, Singh S, Garg A, et al. Tingling hand: magnetic resonance imaging of median nerve pathologies within the carpal tunnel. Pol J Radiol. 2019; 84: e484–e490.
  40. Lane JCE, Craig RS, Rees JL, et al. Serious postoperative complications and reoperation after carpal tunnel decompression surgery in England: a nationwide cohort analysis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021; 3(1): e49–e57.
  41. Lanz U. Anatomical variations of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. J Hand Surg Am. 1977; 2(1): 44–53.
  42. Larsen MB, Sørensen AI, Crone KL, et al. Carpal tunnel release: a randomized comparison of three surgical methods. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013; 38(6): 646–650.
  43. Lawson IJ. Is carpal tunnel syndrome caused by work with vibrating tools? Occup Med (Lond). 2020; 70(1): 8–10.
  44. Leinberry CF, Hammond NL, Siegfried JW. The role of epineurotomy in the operative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79(4): 555–557.
  45. Li C, Wang Ni, Schäffer AA, et al. Mutations in COMP cause familial carpal tunnel syndrome. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1): 3642.
  46. Ly-Pen D, Andréu JL, Millán I, et al. [Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005; 125(15): 585–589.
  47. Ly-Pen D, Andréu JL, Millán I, et al. Comparison of surgical decompression and local steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: 2-year clinical results from a randomized trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012; 51(8): 1447–1454.
  48. MacDermid JC, Wessel J. Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004; 17(2): 309–319.
  49. Mahmoud M, El Shafie S, Coppola EE, et al. Perforator-based radial forearm fascial flap for management of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38(11): 2151–2158.
  50. Marquardt TL, Evans PJ, Seitz WH, et al. Carpal arch and median nerve changes during radioulnar wrist compression in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. J Orthop Res. 2016; 34(7): 1234–1240.
  51. Marquardt TL, Gabra JN, Evans PJ, et al. Thickness and stiffness adaptations of the transverse carpal ligament associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Musculoskelet Res. 2016; 19(4).
  52. Michelotti B, Romanowsky D, Hauck RM. Prospective, randomized evaluation of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an interim analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 73 Suppl 2: S157–S160.
  53. Olney RK. Carpal tunnel syndrome: complex issues with a "simple" condition. Neurology. 2001; 56(11): 1431–1432.
  54. Osiak K, Elnazir P, Mazurek A, et al. Prevalence of the persistent median artery in patients undergoing surgical open carpal tunnel release: A case series. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 23.
  55. Osiak K, Mazurek A, Pękala P, et al. Electrodiagnostic studies in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(12).
  56. Ostergaard PJ, Meyer MA, Earp BE. Non-operative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020; 13(2): 141–147.
  57. Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15(12): 1273–1284.
  58. Padua L, Padua R, Lo Monaco M, et al. Multiperspective assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a multicenter study. Italian CTS Study Group. Neurology. 1999; 53(8): 1654–1659.
  59. Paget J. Lectures on surgical pathology. 2nd Americ. Lindsay & Blakiston, Philadelphia 1860.
  60. Patel P, Antoniou G, Clark D, et al. Screening for carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis. J Child Neurol. 2020; 35(6): 410–417.
  61. Poisel S. Ursprung und Verlauf des Ramusmuscularis des N. digitalis palmaris communis I (N. medianus). Chir Prax. 1974; 18: 471–474.
  62. Puchalski P, Szlosser Z, Żyluk A. Familial occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2019; 53(1): 43–46.
  63. Rosario NB, De Jesus O. Electrodiagnostic Evaluation Of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2021.
  64. Sandin KJ, Asch SM, Jablecki CK, et al. Clinical quality measures for electrodiagnosis in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2010; 41(4): 444–452.
  65. Santosa KB, Chung KC, Waljee JF. Complications of compressive neuropathy: prevention and management strategies. Hand Clin. 2015; 31(2): 139–149.
  66. Sayegh ET, Strauch RJ. Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(3): 1120–1132.
  67. Shen ZL, Li ZM. Ultrasound assessment of transverse carpal ligament thickness: a validity and reliability study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012; 38(6): 982–988.
  68. Shin EK. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019; 12(4): 509–514.
  69. Shinya K, Lanzetta M, Conolly WB. Risk and complications in endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br. 1995; 20(2): 222–227.
  70. Sonoo M, Menkes DL, Bland JDP, et al. Nerve conduction studies and EMG in carpal tunnel syndrome: Do they add value? Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2018; 3: 78–88.
  71. Spinner RJ, Dellon AL. Emanuel B. Kaplan, M.D. (1894-1980): A Legendary Anatomist and Hand Surgeon. Clin Anat. 2018; 31(8): 1104–1108.
  72. Steiner CA, Maggard-Gibbons M, Raetzman SO, et al. Extended Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Open vs Endoscopic Release Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. JAMA. 2015; 314(13): 1399–1401.
  73. Tai TW, Wu CY, Su FC, et al. Ultrasonography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012; 38(7): 1121–1128.
  74. Trehan SK, Lyman S, Ge Y, et al. Incidence of nerve repair following endoscopic carpal tunnel release is higher compared to open release in New York state. HSS J. 2019; 15(2): 143–146.
  75. Trybus M, Koziej M, Belka M, et al. The Polish version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire: Associations between patient-rated outcome measures and nerve conduction studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72(6): 924–932.
  76. Tulipan J, Ilyas A. Carpal tunnel syndrome surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8(3): e2692.
  77. Tung T, Mackinnon S. Secondary carpal tunnel surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107(7): 1830–1843.
  78. Walker WC, Metzler M, Cifu DX, et al. Neutral wrist splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison of night-only versus full-time wear instructions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(4): 424–429.
  79. Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113(9): 1373–1381.
  80. Wright AR, Atkinson RE. Carpal tunnel syndrome: an update for the primary care physician. Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2019; 78(11 Suppl 2): 6–10.
  81. Wulle C. The synovial flap as treatment of the recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clinics. 1996; 12(2): 379–388.
  82. Yunoki M, Kanda T, Suzuki K, et al. Importance of recognizing carpal tunnel syndrome for neurosurgeons: a review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017; 57(4): 172–183.
  83. Zivkovic S, Gruener G, Arnold M, et al. Quality measures in electrodiagnosis: Carpal tunnel syndrome-An AANEM Quality Measure Set. Muscle Nerve. 2020; 61(4): 460–465.
  84. Żyluk A. The role of genetic factors in carpal tunnel syndrome etiology: A review. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020; 29(5): 623–628.
  85. Żytkowski A, Tubbs R, Iwanaga J, et al. Anatomical normality and variability: Historical perspective and methodological considerations. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 23: 100105.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl