open access

Vol 81, No 3 (2022)
Original article
Submitted: 2021-05-09
Accepted: 2021-06-17
Published online: 2021-06-29
Get Citation

A computed tomography comprehensive evaluation of the ostium of the sphenoid sinus and its clinical significance

J. Jaworek-Troć12, J. A. Walocha1, J. Skrzat1, J. Iwanaga3, R. S. Tubbs3, M. Mazur1, M. Lipski1, A. Curlej-Wądrzyk4, T. Gładysz5, R. Chrzan2, A. Urbanik2, M. P. Zarzecki1
·
Pubmed: 34219216
·
Folia Morphol 2022;81(3):694-700.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  2. Department of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
  4. Department of Integrated Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  5. Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland

open access

Vol 81, No 3 (2022)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2021-05-09
Accepted: 2021-06-17
Published online: 2021-06-29

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the size of the sphenoid sinuses’ ostia, the distance between them and the distance between the medial margin of the ostia and the median line in the Polish adult population.
Materials and methods: The analysis was undertaken as a retrospective study of 296 computed tomography (CT) scans of patients (147 females, 149 males) with no comorbidities in their sphenoid sinuses. The paranasal sinuses were investigated by using Spiral CT Scanner (Siemens Somatom Sensation 16), in the option Siemens CARE Dose 4D, without administering any contrast medium. Having obtained transverse planes, multiplans reconstruction tool was used in order to glean sagittal and frontal planes.
Results: The average size of both sphenoid sinus ostia was 0.31 cm for both genders (for females ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 cm and from 0.1 to 0.6 cm for males). The mean distance between both sphenoid sinus ostia was 0.6 cm for both genders (the range for females was 0.1–1.4 cm, whereas 0.1–1.8 cm for males). The average distance between the medial margin of the ostium and the median line was 0.32 cm for both genders (0.31 cm for females in the range of 0–0.9 cm and 0.32 cm for males in the range of 0–1 cm).
Conclusions: Intraoperative identification of the sphenoid sinus ostia might prove difficult and their inadequate excision could lead to potential iatrogenic complications, hence detailed anatomical descriptions are still warranted in specific populations in order to perform safe and effective procedures.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the size of the sphenoid sinuses’ ostia, the distance between them and the distance between the medial margin of the ostia and the median line in the Polish adult population.
Materials and methods: The analysis was undertaken as a retrospective study of 296 computed tomography (CT) scans of patients (147 females, 149 males) with no comorbidities in their sphenoid sinuses. The paranasal sinuses were investigated by using Spiral CT Scanner (Siemens Somatom Sensation 16), in the option Siemens CARE Dose 4D, without administering any contrast medium. Having obtained transverse planes, multiplans reconstruction tool was used in order to glean sagittal and frontal planes.
Results: The average size of both sphenoid sinus ostia was 0.31 cm for both genders (for females ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 cm and from 0.1 to 0.6 cm for males). The mean distance between both sphenoid sinus ostia was 0.6 cm for both genders (the range for females was 0.1–1.4 cm, whereas 0.1–1.8 cm for males). The average distance between the medial margin of the ostium and the median line was 0.32 cm for both genders (0.31 cm for females in the range of 0–0.9 cm and 0.32 cm for males in the range of 0–1 cm).
Conclusions: Intraoperative identification of the sphenoid sinus ostia might prove difficult and their inadequate excision could lead to potential iatrogenic complications, hence detailed anatomical descriptions are still warranted in specific populations in order to perform safe and effective procedures.

Get Citation

Keywords

sphenoid sinus, sphenoid sinus ostium, anatomy

About this article
Title

A computed tomography comprehensive evaluation of the ostium of the sphenoid sinus and its clinical significance

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 81, No 3 (2022)

Article type

Original article

Pages

694-700

Published online

2021-06-29

Page views

4405

Article views/downloads

991

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2021.0063

Pubmed

34219216

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2022;81(3):694-700.

Keywords

sphenoid sinus
sphenoid sinus ostium
anatomy

Authors

J. Jaworek-Troć
J. A. Walocha
J. Skrzat
J. Iwanaga
R. S. Tubbs
M. Mazur
M. Lipski
A. Curlej-Wądrzyk
T. Gładysz
R. Chrzan
A. Urbanik
M. P. Zarzecki

References (25)
  1. Ahmadipour Y, Lemonas E, Maslehaty H, et al. Critical analysis of anatomical landmarks within the sphenoid sinus for transsphenoidal surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 273(11): 3929–3936.
  2. Beale TJ, Madani G, Morley SJ. Imaging of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity: normal anatomy and clinically relevant anatomical variants. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2009; 30(1): 2–16.
  3. Campero A, Emmerich J, Socolovsky M, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the sphenoid ostia. J Clin Neurosci. 2010; 17(10): 1298–1300.
  4. Carvey M, Baek W, Hage R. Bridging the divide: The widening gap between basic science and clinical research. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 24: 100117.
  5. Ecevit MC, Zeybek G, Kiray A, et al. Sphenovomerine suture: a useful landmark for locating sphenoid sinus ostium. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26(1): 264–267.
  6. Elwany S, Elsaeid I, Thabet H. Endoscopic anatomy of the sphenoid sinus. J Laryngol Otol. 1999; 113(2): 122–126.
  7. Elwany S, Yacout YM, Talaat M, et al. Surgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus. J Laryngol Otol. 1983; 97(3): 227–241.
  8. García-Garrigós E, Arenas-Jiménez JJ, Monjas-Cánovas I, et al. Transsphenoidal approach in endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base lesions: what radiologists and surgeons need to know. Radiographics. 2015; 35(4): 1170–1185.
  9. Göçmez C, Göya C, Hamidi C, et al. Evaluation of the surgical anatomy of sphenoid ostium with 3D computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(8): 783–788.
  10. Jaworek-Troć J, Iwanaga J, Chrzan R, et al. Anatomical variations of the main septum of the sphenoidal sinus and its importance during transsphenoidal approaches to the sella turcica. Transl Res Anat. 2020; 21: 100079.
  11. Jaworek-Troć J, Walocha JA, Chrzan R, et al. Protrusion of the carotid canal into the sphenoid sinuses: evaluation before endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(3): 642–649.
  12. Jaworek-Troć J, Walocha JA, Loukas M, et al. Extensive pneumatisation of the sphenoid bone: anatomical investigation of the recesses of the sphenoid sinuses and their clinical importance. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(4): 935–946.
  13. Jaworek-Troć J, Zarzecki M, Bonczar A, et al. Sphenoid bone and its sinus - anatomo-clinical review of the literature including application to FESS. Folia Med Cracov. 2019; 59(2): 45–59.
  14. Jaworek-Troć J, Zarzecki M, Mróz I, et al. The total number of septa and antra in the sphenoid sinuses - evaluation before the FESS. Folia Med Cracov. 2018; 58(3): 67–81.
  15. Jaworek-Troć J, Zarzecki M, Zamojska I, et al. The height and type of the main septum in the sphenoid sinuses — evaluation before the fess. Folia Med Cracov. 2020; 60(3): 65–74.
  16. Jaworek-Troć J, Zarzecki M, Zamojska I, et al. The dimensions of the sphenoid sinuses: evaluation before the functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(2): 275–282.
  17. Krzeski A, Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E, Szwedowicz P, et al. Chirurgia endoskopowa w leczeniu guzów jam nosa i zatok przynosowych. Mag ORL. 2004; 3(3): 79–84.
  18. Mutlu C, Unlu HH, Goktan C, et al. Radiologic anatomy of the sphenoid sinus for intranasal surgery. Rhinology. 2001; 39(3): 128–132.
  19. Sareen D, Agarwal AK, Kaul JM, et al. Study of sphenoid sinus anatomy in relation to endoscopic surgery. Int J Morphol. 2005; 23(3).
  20. Sinha S, Shetty A, Nayak K. The morphology of sella turcica in individuals with different skeletal malocclusions – a cephalometric study. Transl Res Anat. 2020; 18: 100054.
  21. Stecco A, Boccafoschi F, Falaschi Z, et al. Virtual dissection table in diagnosis and classification of Le Fort fractures: A retrospective study of feasibility. Transl Res Anat. 2020; 18: 100060.
  22. Tesfaye S, Hamba N, Gerbi A, et al. Radio-anatomic variability in sphenoid sinus pneumatization with its relationship to adjacent anatomical structures and their impact upon reduction of complications following endonasal transsphenoidal surgeries. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 24: 100126.
  23. Twigg V, Carr SD, Balakumar R, et al. Radiological features for the approach in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. Pituitary. 2017; 20(4): 395–402.
  24. Vidić B. The postnatal development of the sphenoidal sinus and its spread into the dorsum sellae and posterior clinoid processes. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1968; 104(1): 177–183.
  25. Yonetsu K, Watanabe M, Nakamura T. Age-related expansion and reduction in aeration of the sphenoid sinus: volume assessment by helical CT scanning. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(1): 179–182.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl