Location and course of the mandibular canal in dentate patients: morphometric study using cone-beam computed tomography
Abstract
Background: The morphometric characteristics of the mandibular canal (MC) may vary according to the characteristics of the population studied. Correct location of the MC is fundamental for the indication and planning of different dental treatments, and it is therefore essential to have clinical parameters indicating its approximate location. The aim of this study was to describe the location and course of the MC by morphometric relations in the mandibular body, from the mental foramen to distal of the first molar, in dentate adult patients.
Materials and methods: We analysed 55 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of male and female patients, aged over 18 years and with fully dentate to the first molar. In each CBCT we selected five coronal sections (A–E) of the mandibular body at different levels using the teeth as references. We determined different morphometric measurements in each section to relate the MC with the corticals of the mandibular body (m1, m2, m3, m4), their orientation to lingual (F) and the thickness of the mandibular corticals (B1, B2 and B3).
Results: The distance between the MC and the alveolar crests was greater in males than in females in all the sections. In general, in all the hemiarches, the MC courses away from the vestibular cortical of the mandible (and in some cases significantly towards the lingual cortical) from anterior to posterior in the mandibular body. In the left hemiarch of dentate females the MC describes a descent in the molar zone within the mandibular body. Any intervention in the mandible must be carried out with extreme caution to avoid damaging the vasculo-nervous bundle which passes through the MC.
Conclusions: Cone-beam computed tomography is the best tool currently available for the planning and execution of surgical procedures, and is the only tool in clinical use which allows the precise course of the MC to be identified.
Keywords: mandibular canalcone-beam computed tomographyChilean populationlocalisation
References
- Aksoy U, Aksoy S, Orhan K. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the anatomical relationships between mandibular teeth and the mandibular canal, with a review of the current literature. Microsc Res Tech. 2017; 81(3): 308–314.
- Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Thomas S, et al. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66(10): 2130–2135.
- Azcárate-Velázquez F, Bertos-Quilez J, Marmesat-Guerrero F, et al. Fiabilidad del uso de la tomografía computarizada de haz cónico en la localización y medida del conducto mandibular en la planificación de técnicas quirúrgicas en el cuerpo mandibular. Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial. 2015; 37(4): 182–187.
- Domínguez J, Ruge O, Aguilar G, et al. Análisis de la posición y trayectoria del conducto alveolar inferior (CAI) en tomografía volumétrica computarizada (TC Cone Beam - TCCB). Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2010; 22(1): 12–22.
- Figún M, Garino R. Anatomía Odontológica Funcional y Aplicada. 2da ed. El Ateneo, Buenos Aires. 2001.
- Fuentes R, Flores T, Dias F, et al. Localization of the mental foramen through digital panoramic radiographs in a chilean population. Int J Morphol. 2017; 35(4): 1309–1315.
- Gungor E, Aglarci OS, Unal M, et al. Evaluation of mental foramen location in the 10-70 years age range using cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20(1): 88–92.
- Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, et al. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016; 45(2): 20150310.
- Karamifar K, Shahidi S, Tondari A. Bilateral bifid mandibular canal: report of two cases. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20(2): 235–237.
- Kawashima Y, Sakai O, Shosho D, et al. Proximity of the mandibular canal to teeth and cortical bone. J Endod. 2016; 42(2): 221–224.
- Kilic C, Kamburoğlu K, Ozen T, et al. The position of the mandibular canal and histologic feature of the inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Anat. 2010; 23(1): 34–42.
- Koivisto T, Chiona D, Milroy LL, et al. Mandibular canal location: cone-beam computed tomography examination. J Endod. 2016; 42(7): 1018–1021.
- Kuczynski A, Kucharski W, Franco A, et al. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs: a maxillofacial surgical scope. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(9): 847–850.
- Mizbah K, Gerlach N, Maal TJ, et al. The clinical relevance of bifid and trifid mandibular canals. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 16(1): 147–151.
- Montaño M. Tomografia cone beam 3D su aplicación en odontología. Rev Act Clin Med. 2013; 38(38): 1897–1901.
- Muñoz G, Dias F, Weber B, et al. Anatomic relationships of mandibular canal. A cone beam CT study. Int J Morphol. 2017; 35(4): 1243–1248.
- Nortjé CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg. 1977; 15(1): 55–63.
- Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza AL, Dezzoti MS, et al. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19(3): 240–243.
- Roa I, Arriagada O. Variaciones del canal mandibular con importancia clínica: reporte de caso. Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(3): 971–974.
- Rouvière H, Delmas A. Anatomía Humana Descriptiva, Topográfica y Funcional. 10a ed. Masson, Barcelona. 1999.
- Sánchez B, Díaz J, Villanueva-Vilchis M, et al. Morphometric relationships between the mandibular canal and the molar teeth: a tomographic analysis report. Int J Morphol. 2017; 35(2): 564–570.
- Sîrbu VD, Perlea P, Nimigean VR, et al. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in dentate subjects. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017; 58(4): 1401–1408.
- Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(2): 253–259.
- White S, Pharoah M. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 7a ed. Elseiver, Riverport Ln. 2014.
- Zmyslowska-Polakowska E, Radwanski M, Ledzion S, et al. Evaluation of Size and Location of a Mental Foramen in the Polish Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 1659476.
