Vol 78, No 2 (2019)
Original article
Published online: 2018-09-25

open access

Page views 2865
Article views/downloads 2278
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Assessment of paranasal sinus parameters according to ancient skulls’ gender and age by using cone-beam computed tomography

K.O. Demiralp1, S. Kursun Cakmak1, S. Aksoy2, S. Bayrak3, K. Orhan4, P. Demir5
Pubmed: 30280374
Folia Morphol 2019;78(2):344-350.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether paranasal sinus dimensions and volume can be useful to identify gender and age estimation for ancient skulls using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. 

Materials and methods: CBCT scans of 32 ancient skulls of approximately 1000 years of age were included in this retrospective study. The gender and age estimation of the skulls were made by an independent anthropologist, which was considered as the gold standard. Paranasal sinuses’ dimensions (width and height) and volumes of each sinus were measured from the CBCT data set that was linked to the three-dimensional rendering software (Anatomage, Invivo 5.2). All measurements were performed by an independent observer. Intra-observer analysis was made. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare paranasal sinus parameters in terms of age estimation and gender (p < 0.05). 

Results: The results demonstrated no statistically significant difference between measurements (p < 0.05). The measurements were found to be highly reprodu- cible. The mean volumes of frontal and sphenoid sinus were found to be higher in males. The distance from anterior-posterior wall of sphenoid sinus in axial sec- tions is larger in males (p > 0.05). The frontal sinus width and volume increased statistically with age above 60 years of age (p > 0.05). 

Conclusions: The paranasal volume and dimensions’ measurements from CBCT data can be a promising technique to determine gender and age of ancient skulls because of its lower voxel sizes and higher resolution. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Amin MF, Hassan EI. Sex identification in Egyptian population using Multidetector Computed Tomography of the maxillary sinus. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012; 19(2): 65–69.
  2. Belaldavar C, Kotrashetti VS, Hallikerimath SR, et al. Assessment of frontal sinus dimensions to determine sexual dimorphism among Indian adults. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014; 6(1): 25–30.
  3. Brothwell DR. Diggingupbones: theexcavation, treatment, andstudy of humanskeletalremains: Cornell University Press. 1981.
  4. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, et al. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(1): 150–157.
  5. Buckland-Wright JC. A radiographic examination of frontal sinuses in early British populations. Man. 1970; 5(3): 512.
  6. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at theFieldMuseum of Natural History. 1994.
  7. Cox M, Malcolm M, Fairgrieve SI. A new digital method for the objective comparison of frontal sinuses for identification. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54(4): 761–772.
  8. David MP, Saxena R. Use of frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns as an aid in personal identification: A digital radiographic pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010; 2(2): 77–80.
  9. del SenoFrontal VA Anatomicalvariations of thefrontalsinus Int J Morphol. 2008; 26: 803–808.
  10. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(2): 257–265.
  11. Günay Y, Altinkök M. The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med. 2000; 7(3): 147–149.
  12. Kanthem RK, Guttikonda VR, Yeluri S, et al. Sex determination using maxillary sinus. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015; 7(2): 163–167.
  13. Kawarai Y, Fukushima K, Ogawa T, et al. Volume quantification of healthy paranasal cavity by three-dimensional CT imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1999; 540: 45–49.
  14. Krogman WM. Determination of sexandparturition. Thehumanskeleton in forensicmedicine. 1986: 208–259.
  15. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5): 291–294.
  16. Licata M, Borgo M, Armocida G, et al. New paleoradiological investigations of ancient human remains from North West Lombardy archaeological excavations. Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45(3): 323–331.
  17. Márquez-Grant N. An overview of age estimation in forensic anthropology: perspectives and practical considerations. Ann Hum Biol. 2015; 42(4): 308–322.
  18. Michel J, Paganelli A, Varoquaux A, et al. Determination of sex: interest of frontal sinus 3D reconstructions. J Forensic Sci. 2015; 60(2): 269–273.
  19. Moreira CR, Sales MAO, Lopes PML, et al. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108(3): 430–436.
  20. Prabhat M, Rai S, Kaur M, et al. Computed tomography based forensic gender determination by measuring the size and volume of the maxillary sinuses. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016; 8(1): 40–46.
  21. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, et al. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(2): e117–e127.
  22. Tatlisumak E, Ovali GY, Asirdizer M, et al. CT study on morphometry of frontal sinus. Clin Anat. 2008; 21(4): 287–293.
  23. Teke HY, Duran S, Canturk N, et al. Determination of gender by measuring the size of the maxillary sinuses in computerized tomography scans. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29(1): 9–13.
  24. Ubelaker D, Grant L. Human skeletal remains: Preservation or reburial? Am J Physical Anthropology. 1989; 32(S10): 249–287.
  25. Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Naaimi AS, et al. Evaluation of frontal sinus and skull measurements using spiral CT scanning: an aid in unknown person identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 197(1-3): 124.e1–124.e7.
  26. Uthman A, Al-Rawi N, Al-Naaimi A, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination using helical CT scanning. J Forensic Scien. 2011; 56(2): 403–408.
  27. van Vlijmen OJC, Bergé SJ, Swennen GRJ, et al. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(1): 92–97.
  28. Yoshino M, Miyasaka S, Sato H, et al. Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 1987; 34(4): 289–299.