Vol 77, No 3 (2018)
Original article
Published online: 2017-12-13

open access

Page views 2354
Article views/downloads 1369
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Facial soft tissue thicknesses in Bulgarian adults: relation to sex, body mass index and bilateral asymmetry

D. Toneva1, S. Nikolova1, I. Georgiev23, S. Harizanov23, D. Zlatareva4, V. Hadjidekov4, N. Lazarov45
Pubmed: 29235090
Folia Morphol 2018;77(3):570-582.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to measure the facial soft tissue thicknesses (STTs) in Bulgarians, to evaluate the relation of the STTs to the nutritional status, sex and bilateral asymmetry, and to examine the correlations between the separate STTs as well as between the STTs and body weight, height, and body mass index (BMI). In the present study, the facial STTs were measured on computed tomography scans of the head of Bulgarian adults. Materials and methods: The STTs were measured at 7 midline and 9 bilateral landmarks. The measurements were performed in the free software InVesalius in the axial and sagittal planes. The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values, median and coefficient of variation were reported for the STT at each landmark according to the sex and BMI category. The BMI, sex and bilateral differences were assessed for statistical significance. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to assess the strength and direction of the relationships between the STTs and body height, weight and BMI, as well as between separate STTs. Results and Conclusions: The facial soft tissues in Bulgarian adults changed in accordance with the nutritional status of the individual and in both sexes all STTs augmented with the increasing BMI. For both normal and overweight BMI categories, males had more soft tissue at the majority of facial points than females, as the only exceptions were observed in the cheek zone, where STTs were thicker in females. Significant bilateral differences were observed in either sex and BMI category. Stronger correlations were established for the STTs in the jaw region and between the cheek and jaw soft tissues. Besides, the correlations between the homologous bilateral landmarks were among the strongest ones.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Aulsebrook WA, Becker PJ, Işcan MY. Facial soft-tissue thicknesses in the adult male Zulu. Forensic Sci Int. 1996; 79(2): 83–102.
  2. Bulut O, Sipahioglu S, Hekimoglu B. Facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction in the Turkish adult population. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 242: 44–61.
  3. Cavanagh D, Steyn M. Facial reconstruction: soft tissue thickness values for South African black females. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 206(1-3): 215.e1–215.e7.
  4. Chan WN, Listi GA, Manhein MH. In vivo facial tissue depth study of Chinese-American adults in New York City. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(2): 350–358.
  5. Codinha S. Facial soft tissue thicknesses for the Portuguese adult population. Forensic Sci Int. 2009; 184(1-3): 80.e1–80.e7.
  6. De Greef S, Claes P, Vandermeulen D, et al. Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 2006; 159 Suppl 1: S126–S146.
  7. De Greef S, Vandermeulen D, Claes P, et al. The influence of sex, age and body mass index on facial soft tissue depths. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009; 5(2): 60–65.
  8. Domaracki M, Stephan CN. Facial soft tissue thicknesses in Australian adult cadavers. J Forensic Sci. 2006; 51(1): 5–10.
  9. Dong Y, Huang Li, Feng Z, et al. Influence of sex and body mass index on facial soft tissue thickness measurements of the northern Chinese adult population. Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 222(1-3): 396.e1–396.e7.
  10. Drgáčová A, Dupej J, Velemínská J. Facial soft tissue thicknesses in the present Czech Population. Forensic Sci Int. 2016; 260: 106.e1–106.e7.
  11. Dumont ER. Mid-facial tissue depths of white children: an aid in facial feature reconstruction. J Forensic Sci. 1986; 31(4): 1463–1469.
  12. Dumont T, Simon E, Stricker M, et al. [Facial fat: descriptive and functional anatomy, from a review of literature and dissections of 10 split-faces]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2007; 52(1): 51–61.
  13. El-Mehallawi IH, Soliman EM. Ultrasonic assessment of facial soft tissue thicknesses in adult Egyptians. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 117(1-2): 99–107.
  14. George R. The Lateral Craniographic Method of Facial Reconstruction. J Forensic Sci. 1987; 32(5).
  15. Guyomarc'h P, Santos F, Dutailly B, et al. Facial soft tissue depths in French adults: variability, specificity and estimation. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 231(1-3): 411.e1–411.10.
  16. Hwang HS, Park MK, Lee WJ, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction in Korean adults. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 57(6): 1442–1447.
  17. Kurkcuoglu A, Pelin C, Ozener B, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness in individuals with different occlusion patterns in adult Turkish subjects. HOMO. 2011; 62(4): 288–297.
  18. Masoume J, Farzad E, Mohaddeseh MM. Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in North-West of Iran. Adv Biosci Clin Med. 2014; 3(1): 29–34.
  19. Panenková P, Beňuš R, Masnicová S, et al. Facial soft tissue thicknesses of the mid-face for Slovak population. Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 220(1-3): 293.e1–293.e6.
  20. Phillips VM, Smuts NA. Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population. Forensic Sci Int. 1996; 83(1): 51–59.
  21. Rhine JS, Campbell HR. Thickness of facial tissues in American blacks. J Forensic Sci. 1980; 25(4): 847–858.
  22. Ruiz NEP. Facial soft tissue thickness of Colombian adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 229(1-3): 160.e1–160.e9.
  23. Sahni D, Singh G, Jit I, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness in northwest Indian adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 176(2-3): 137–146.
  24. Simpson E, Henneberg M. Variation in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 118(2): 121–133.
  25. Starbuck JM, Ward RE. The affect of tissue depth variation on craniofacial reconstructions. Forensic Sci Int. 2007; 172(2-3): 130–136.
  26. Stephan CN, Norris RM, Henneberg M. Does sexual dimorphism in facial soft tissue depths justify sex distinction in craniofacial identification? J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50(3): 513–518.
  27. Suazo GIC, Cantín LM, Zavando MDA, et al. Comparisons in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face in fresh and embalmed corpses using needle puncture method. Int J Morpho. 2008; 26(1): 165–169.
  28. Sutton PR. Bizygomatic diameter: the thickness of the soft tissues over the zygions. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1969; 30(2): 303–310.
  29. Suzuki K. On the thickness of the soft parts of the Japanese face. The Journal of Anthropological Society of Nippon. 1948; 60(1): 7–11.
  30. Tedeshi-Oliveira SV, Haltenhoff RF, Haddad NH, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness of Brazilian adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2009; 193: 127.e1-127.e.7.
  31. Thiemann N, Keil V, Roy U. In vivo facial soft tissue depths of a modern adult population from Germany. Int J Legal Med. 2017; 131(5): 1455–1488.
  32. Torres MSR, Cantín M, Pérez RFJ, et al. Evaluation of facial asymmetry using soft-tissue thickness for forensic purposes. Int J Morphol. 2011; 29(3): 1033–1039.
  33. Wilkinson CM. In vivo facial tissue depth measurements for white British children. J Forensic Sci. 2002; 47(3): 459–465.