Vol 77, No 3 (2018)
Original article
Published online: 2018-01-15

open access

Page views 3213
Article views/downloads 1726
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Anatomical characteristics of the lingual foramen in ancient skulls: a cone beam computed tomography study in an Anatolian population

K.O. Demiralp1, S. Bayrak2, M. Orhan3, A. Alan1, E. S. Kursun Cakmak1, K. Orhan4
Pubmed: 29345723
Folia Morphol 2018;77(3):514-520.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the anatomical features of lingual foramina and their bony canals in Anatolian ancient mandibles (9–10th century) by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: Fifty-eight ancient dry mandibles were scanned with CBCT. Lingual foramina were grouped into midline, paramedian, posterior foramina and combination of these groups. Midline group was also classified according to internal surface of the mandible (gonial tubercles [GTs]). The incidence, vertical distance and diameter of lingual foramina were measured according to age groups and gender. Results: The incidence of the lingual foramen was 96.6%. Midline of the symphysis had the highest incidence (34.4%) of foramina (p < 0.05), followed by both midline and paramedian type (32.8%; p < 0.05). Classification in terms of GT represented class 3 as the most encountered group (28.6%). Number of foramina observed in the mandibles ranged from 0 to 6 with the incidence of 3.4% and 32.8%, respectively. The male and < 35 years groups presented larger measurement values in midline region (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Mandibular lingual foramina and bony canals are frequently present in ancient mandibles. When compared with modern subjects, similar findings are observed according to published literatures. CBCT is also proved to be an effective imaging modality in the detection of lingual foramina and canals in anthropological studies.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Aoun G, Nasseh I, Sokhn S, et al. Lingual foramina and canals of the mandible: anatomic variations in a lebanese population. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2017; 7: 16.
  2. Arx von T, Lozanoff S. Lingual foramina and canals. Clinical Oral Anat. 2016: 463–487.
  3. Babiuc I, Tărlungeanu I, Păuna M. Cone beam computed tomography observations of the lingual foramina and their bony canals in the median region of the mandible. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011; 52(3): 827–829.
  4. Bernardi S, Bianchi S, Continenza MA, et al. Frequency and anatomical features of the mandibular lingual foramina: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 39(12): 1349–1357.
  5. Denny C, Natarajan S, Ahmed J, et al. Anatomic Variation in Lingual Foramen: A Cone beam Computed Tomography Study. World J Dent. 2016; 7(4): 179–181.
  6. Gahleitner A, Hofschneider U, Tepper G, et al. Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: evaluation with dental CT. Radiology. 2001; 220(1): 186–189.
  7. He X, Jiang J, Cai W, et al. Assessment of the appearance, location and morphology of mandibular lingual foramina using cone beam computed tomography. Int Dent J. 2016; 66(5): 272–279.
  8. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999; 195 ( Pt 4): 491–513.
  9. Katakami K, Mishima A, Kuribayashi A, et al. Anatomical characteristics of the mandibular lingual foramina observed on limited cone-beam CT images. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(4): 386–390.
  10. Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, et al. Classification of the lingual foramina and their bony canals in the median region of the mandible: cone beam computed tomography observations of dry Japanese mandibles. Oral Radiol. 2007; 23(2): 42–48.
  11. Liang X, Jacobs R, Corpas LS, et al. Chronologic and geographic variability of neurovascular structures in the human mandible. Forensic Sci Int. 2009; 190(1-3): 24–32.
  12. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, et al. Microanatomical and histological assessment of the content of superior genial spinal foramen and its bony canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34(6): 362–368.
  13. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I. An assessment on spiral CT scan of the superior and inferior genial spinal foramina and canals. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006; 28(1): 98–104.
  14. Lycett SJ, Collard M. Do homoiologies impede phylogenetic analyses of the fossil hominids? An assessment based on extant papionin craniodental morphology. J Hum Evol. 2005; 49(5): 618–642.
  15. McDonnell D, Reza Nouri M, Todd ME. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat. 1994; 184 ( Pt 2): 363–369.
  16. Patil S, Matsuda Y, Okano T. Accessory mandibular foramina: a CT study of 300 cases. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013; 35(4): 323–330.
  17. Sekerci AE, Sisman Y, Payveren MA. Evaluation of location and dimensions of mandibular lingual foramina using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(9): 857–864.
  18. Sheikhi M, Mosavat F, Ahmadi A. Assessing the anatomical variations of lingual foramen and its bony canals with CBCT taken from 102 patients in Isfahan. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012; 9(Suppl 1): S45–S51.
  19. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, et al. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16(1): 68–72.
  20. Vandewalle G, Liang X, Jacobs R, et al. Macroanatomic and radiologic characteristics of the superior genial spinal foramen and its bony canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21(4): 581–586.
  21. Yildirim YD, Güncü GN, Galindo-Moreno P, et al. Evaluation of mandibular lingual foramina related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a multicenter clinical study. Implant Dent. 2014; 23(1): 57–63.