open access

Vol 77, No 1 (2018)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2017-08-18
Submitted: 2017-04-14
Accepted: 2017-05-31
Get Citation

Assessment of the orbit morphometry on West Anatolian dry skulls

G. N. Yonguc, N. Gocmen-Mas, F. Aksu, M. Edizer, S. P. Akyer, S. Karabekir
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2017.0071
·
Pubmed: 28832086
·
Folia Morphol 2018;77(1):105-109.

open access

Vol 77, No 1 (2018)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2017-08-18
Submitted: 2017-04-14
Accepted: 2017-05-31

Abstract

The orbit is very frequently damaged by traumas which result in not only bone deficits, but also functional deformities if reconstruction is not appropriate. Anatomical exposure of the bony orbit is of importance for both anatomists and surgeons who perform operation on this area. The current study evaluated the group of morphometrical parameters on 74 adult West Anatolian dry skulls and stereological surface area on the dry skull orbits while describing the clinical importance. Surface areas on the orbital base of the skulls were also evaluated using stereological method, bilaterally. Anthropological assessment of orbital base (in terms of width and height) revealed no significant difference between right and left sides. Both width and height of the optic foramen were significantly higher on the right side compared to left. The distances between the margins (medial, lateral, superior, inferior) of the orbital base and the optic foramen were longer on the right side compared to left, except the distances between the lateral margins. There was no significant difference among the subjects between right and left sides with respect to the orbital base in terms of stereological area calculation. The results are significant because there are no recorded anatomical data on West Anatolian skulls at previous researches. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 1: 105–109)

Abstract

The orbit is very frequently damaged by traumas which result in not only bone deficits, but also functional deformities if reconstruction is not appropriate. Anatomical exposure of the bony orbit is of importance for both anatomists and surgeons who perform operation on this area. The current study evaluated the group of morphometrical parameters on 74 adult West Anatolian dry skulls and stereological surface area on the dry skull orbits while describing the clinical importance. Surface areas on the orbital base of the skulls were also evaluated using stereological method, bilaterally. Anthropological assessment of orbital base (in terms of width and height) revealed no significant difference between right and left sides. Both width and height of the optic foramen were significantly higher on the right side compared to left. The distances between the margins (medial, lateral, superior, inferior) of the orbital base and the optic foramen were longer on the right side compared to left, except the distances between the lateral margins. There was no significant difference among the subjects between right and left sides with respect to the orbital base in terms of stereological area calculation. The results are significant because there are no recorded anatomical data on West Anatolian skulls at previous researches. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 1: 105–109)

Get Citation

Keywords

orbit, morphometry, asymmetry, skull, stereology

About this article
Title

Assessment of the orbit morphometry on West Anatolian dry skulls

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 77, No 1 (2018)

Pages

105-109

Published online

2017-08-18

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2017.0071

Pubmed

28832086

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2018;77(1):105-109.

Keywords

orbit
morphometry
asymmetry
skull
stereology

Authors

G. N. Yonguc
N. Gocmen-Mas
F. Aksu
M. Edizer
S. P. Akyer
S. Karabekir

References (32)
  1. Acer N, Sahin B, Usanmaz M, et al. Comparison of point counting and planimetry methods for the assessment of cerebellar volume in human using magnetic resonance imaging: a stereological study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008; 30(4): 335–339.
  2. Altunkaynak B, Onger M, Altunkaynak M, et al. A Brief Introduction to Stereology and Sampling Strategies: Basic Concepts of Stereology. NeuroQuantology. 2011; 10(1).
  3. Barone CM, Jimenez DF, Laskey A, et al. Bony orbital distances among the Filipino population. J Craniofac Surg. 2002; 13(2): 258–261.
  4. Bas O, Acer N, Mas N, et al. Stereological evaluation of the volume and volume fraction of intracranial structures in magnetic resonance images of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Ann Anat. 2009; 191(2): 186–195.
  5. Berlis A, Putz R, Schumacher M. [Measurements and variations in the region of the optic canal. CT and anatomy]. Radiologe. 1992; 32(9): 436–440.
  6. Canan S, Şahin B, Odacı E, et al. Estimation of the reference volume, volume density and volume ratios by a stereological method: Cavalieri’s principle. T Klin J Med Sci. 2002; 22: 7–14.
  7. Carls FR, Josca R, Sailer HF. [The measurement of orbital volume in reconstruction of the orbital walls]. Minerva Stomatol. 1996; 45(11): 493–499.
  8. Charteris DG, Chan CH, Whitehouse RW, et al. Orbital volume measurement in the management of pure blowout fractures of the orbital floor. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77(2): 100–102.
  9. Chebib FS, Chamma AM. Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51(3): 214–226.
  10. Cook T. Ocular and periocular injuries from orbital fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195(6): 831–834.
  11. Deveci M, Oztürk S, Sengezer M, et al. Measurement of orbital volume by a 3-dimensional software program: an experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58(6): 645–648.
  12. Ezaldein HH, Metzler P, Persing JA, et al. Three-dimensional orbital dysmorphology in metopic synostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67(7): 900–905.
  13. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, et al. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 103(4): 327–337.
  14. Gocmen-Mas N, Pelin C, Canan S, et al. Stereological evaluation of volumetric asymmetry in healthy human cerebellum. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(3): 177–181.
  15. Gong QY, Tan LT, Romaniuk CS, et al. Determination of tumour regression rates during radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma by serial MRI: comparison of two measurement techniques and examination of intraobserver and interobserver variability. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72(853): 62–72.
  16. Gundersen H, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, et al. Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS. 1988; 96(1-6): 379–394.
  17. Ji Y, Qian Z, Dong Y, et al. Quantitative morphometry of the orbit in Chinese adults based on a three-dimensional reconstruction method. J Anat. 2010; 217(5): 501–506.
  18. Kahveci OK, Gocmen-Mas N, Okur N, et al. Investigation of temporal bone asymmetry in cases with unilateral tinnitus: morphometric and multicentric clinical study. Folia Morphol. 2013; 72(1): 22–28.
  19. Karabekir HS, Gocmen-Mas N, Emel E, et al. Ocular and periocular injuries associated with an isolated orbital fracture depending on a blunt cranial trauma: anatomical and surgical aspects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40(7): e189–e193.
  20. Lukats O, Vízkelety T, Markella Z, et al. Measurement of orbital volume after enucleation and orbital implantation. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e50333.
  21. Mağden A, Kaynak S. Bilateral duplication of the optic canals. Ann Anat. 1996; 178(1): 61–64.
  22. McEvoy F. An application of image processing techniques in computed tomography image analysis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007; 48(6): 528–534.
  23. Mulick JF. An investigation of craniofacial asymmetry using the serial twin-study method. Am J Orthod. 1965; 51: 112–129.
  24. Patil GV, Kolagi S, Padmavathi G, et al. The duplication of the optic canals in human skulls. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011; 5: 536–537.
  25. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(4): 381–385.
  26. Ruskell GL. The orbit and its content. Chapter 41. In: Standring S (Chief ed.). Gray’s anatomy head and neck. 39th ed. Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2005: 681–700.
  27. Sahin B, Ergur H. Assessment of the optimum section thickness for the estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance images: a stereological gold standard study. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 57(1): 96–101.
  28. Seiji F, Moreira RS, De Angelis MA, et al. Orbital asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Orbit. 2009; 28(6): 342–346.
  29. Selva D, White VA, O'Connell JX, et al. Primary bone tumors of the orbit. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49(3): 328–342.
  30. Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod. 1978; 48(2): 141–148.
  31. West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJ. Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in thesubdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec. 1991; 231(4): 482–497.
  32. Yilmaz I, Adiguzel E, Akdogan I, et al. Effects of second generation tetracyclines on penicillin-epilepsy-induced hippocampal neuronal loss and motor incoordination in rats. Life Sci. 2006; 79(8): 784–790.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl