Vol 77, No 1 (2018)
Original article
Published online: 2017-07-06

open access

Page views 2484
Article views/downloads 2271
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The size of the foramen ovale regarding to the presence and absence of the emissary sphenoidal foramen: is there any relationship between them?

K. Natsis, M. Piagkou, E. Repousi, T. Tegos, A. Gkioka, M. Loukas
Pubmed: 28703850
Folia Morphol 2018;77(1):90-98.

Abstract

Background: The study investigates the size of the foramen ovale (FO) in relation to the presence and absence of the emissary sphenoidal foramen (ESF). Any possible alteration of the FO size in relation to the ESF (unilateral or bilateral) presence and absence was also examined.

Materials and methods: One-hundred and ninety-five (117 male and 78 female) Greek adult dry skulls were investigated.

Results: The ESF was present in 40% of the skulls (21.5% bilaterally and 18.5% unilaterally). No statistical significant difference was detected between ESF presence or absence and its unilateral or bilateral occurrence. The ESF existence had no relation to the FO size.

Conclusions: The ESF absence or presence has no effect on FO size. The emissary sphenoidal vein is an additional venous pathway connecting cavernous sinus with the pterygoid venous plexus. These findings enhance that the venous plexus of the FO is a constant trait. The meticulous knowledge of the middle cranial fossa anatomy is of paramount importance during transovale procedures, as the outcome of cannulation may be affected by the existence of ESF, the confluence FO-ESF, the existence of osseous spurs and bridging into the FO. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 1: 90–98)  

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Agarwal DR, Gupta SBA. Morphometeric analysis of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum of human sphenoid bone in the south gujarat population: vital for medical practitioners in cases of trigeminal neuralgia. JARBS. 2012; 4: 243–245.
  2. Arrese I, Lobato RD, Alén JF, et al. Acute subdural and intratemporal hematoma as a complication of percutaneous compression of the gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005; 16(2): 177–182.
  3. Arrese I, Urculo E. Needle insertion in the foramen ovale. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011; 153(1): 201; author reply 202.
  4. Berge JK, Bergman RA. Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull. Clin Anat. 2001; 14(6): 406–413.
  5. Bohnstedt BN, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA. The use of intraoperative navigation for percutaneous procedures at the skull base including a difficult-to-access foramen ovale. Neurosurgery. 2012; 70(2 Suppl Operative): 177–180.
  6. Boyd GI. The emissary foramina of the cranium in man and the anthropoids. J Anat. 1930; 65(Pt 1): 108–121.
  7. Daimi SR, Siddiqui AU, Gill SS. Analysis of foramen ovale with special emphasis on pterygoalar bar and pterygoalar foramen. Folia Morphol. 2011; 70(3): 149–153.
  8. Di Ieva A, Bruner E, Haider T, et al. Skull base embryology: a multidisciplinary review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014; 30(6): 991–1000.
  9. Dogan NU, Fazliogullari Z, Uysal I, et al. Anatomical examination of the foramens of the middle cranial fossa. Int J Morphol. 2014; 32(1): 43–48.
  10. Ginsberg LE, Pruett SW, Chen MY, et al. Skull-base foramina of the middle cranial fossa: reassessment of normal variation with high-resolution CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994; 15(2): 283–291.
  11. Guo Z, Wu B, Du C, et al. Stereotactic approach combined with 3D CT reconstruction for difficult-to-access foramen ovale on radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Med. 2016; 17(9): 1704–1716.
  12. Gupta N, Yadav D, Thomas P, et al. Incidence of Foramen Vesalius in Adult Human North Indian Crania. IOSR J Dental Med Scien. 2014; 13(5): 34–38.
  13. Hayashi N, Sato H, Tsuboi Y, et al. Consequences of preoperative evaluation of patterns of drainage of the cavernous sinus in patients treated using the anterior transpetrosal approach. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2010; 50(5): 373–377.
  14. Henderson WR. A note on the relationship of the human maxillary nerve to the cavernous sinus and to an emissary sinus passing through the foramen ovale. J Anat. 1966; 100(Pt 4): 905–908.
  15. James TM, Presley R, Steel FL. The foramen ovale and sphenoidal angle in man. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1980; 160(1): 93–104.
  16. Kaplan M, Erol FS, Ozveren MF, et al. Review of complications due to foramen ovale puncture. J Clin Neurosci. 2007; 14(6): 563–568.
  17. Lang J, Maier R, Schafhauser O. [Postnatal enlargement of the foramina rotundum, ovale et spinosum and their topographical changes]. Anat Anz. 1984; 156(5): 351–387.
  18. Lazarus L, Naidoo N, Satyapal KS. An osteometric evaluation of the foramen spinosum and venosum. Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(2): 452–458.
  19. Liang L, Diao Y, Xu Q, et al. Transcranial segment of the trigeminal nerve: macro-/microscopic anatomical study using sheet plastination. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156(3): 605–612.
  20. Lin MHC, Lee MH, Wang TC, et al. Foramen ovale cannulation guided by intra-operative computed tomography with integrated neuronavigation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011; 153(8): 1593–1599.
  21. Murlimanju BV, Reddy GR, Latha VP, et al. Foramen of vesalius: prevalence, morphology, embryological basis and clinical implications. J Surg Academia. 2015; 5: 24–28.
  22. Murugan M, Saheb S. Morphometric and morphological study on foramen ovale. Int J Anat Res. 2014; 2(4): 664–667.
  23. Natsis K, Repousi E, Sofidis G, et al. The osseous structures in the infratemporal fossa: foramen ovale, bony spurs, ossified ligaments and their contribution to the trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015; 157(1): 101–103.
  24. Nemzek WR, Brodie HA, Hecht ST, et al. MR, CT, and plain film imaging of the developing skull base in fetal specimens. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(9): 1699–1706.
  25. Ozer MA, Govsa F. Measurement accuracy of foramen of vesalius for safe percutaneous techniques using computer-assisted three-dimensional landmarks. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(2): 147–154.
  26. Padget DH. The development of the cranial venous system in man, from the viewpoint of comparative anatomy. Contrib Embryol. 1957; 36: 79–140.
  27. Patil J, Kumar N, K G MR, et al. The foramen ovale morphometry of sphenoid bone in South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7(12): 2668–2670.
  28. Raval BB, Singh PR, Rajguru J. A morphologic and morphometric study of foramen vesalius in dry adult human skulls of gujarat region. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(2): AC04–AC07.
  29. Ray B, Gupta N, Ghose S. Anatomic variations of foramen ovale. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005; 3(1): 64–68.
  30. Rossi AC, Freire AR, Prado FB, et al. Morphological characteristics of foramen of Vesalius and its relationship with clinical implications. J Morphol Scien. 2010; 27: 26–29.
  31. Schmalfuss IM, Camp M. Skull base: pseudolesion or true lesion? Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(6): 1232–1243.
  32. Sharma NA, Garud RS. Morphometric evaluation and a report on the aberrations of the foramina in the intermediate region of the human cranial base: A study of an Indian population. Eur J Anat. 2011; 15: 140–149.
  33. Shinohara AL, de Souza Melo CG, Silveira EM, et al. Incidence, morphology and morphometry of the foramen of Vesalius: complementary study for a safer planning and execution of the trigeminal rhizotomy technique. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010; 32(2): 159–164.
  34. Skrzat J, Walocha J, Srodek R. An anatomical study of the pterygoalar bar and the pterygoalar foramen. Folia Morphol. 2005; 64(2): 92–96.
  35. Skrzat J, Walocha J, Srodek R, et al. An atypical position of the foramen ovale. Folia Morphol. 2006; 65(4): 396–399.
  36. Skrzat J, Walocha J, Zawiliński J. Accessory spine of the foramen ovale. Folia Morphol. 2012; 71(4): 263–266.
  37. Somesh MS, Sridevi HB, Prabhu LV, et al. A morphometric study of foramen ovale. Turk Neurosurg. 2011; 21(3): 378–383.
  38. Srimani P, Mukherjee P, Sarkar M, et al. Foramina in alisphenoid. Observational study on their osseomorphology and morphometry. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2014; 3: 1–6.
  39. Standring S. he Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. In Gray’s Anatomy, 41th Edition. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, London 2015.
  40. Tubbs RS, Dixon J, Loukas M, et al. Regional vascular relationships to the foramen ovale: an anatomical study with application to approaches to the external skull base with an emphasis on transcutaneous procedures for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2010; 113(3): 493–497.
  41. Williams LS, Schmalfuss IM, Sistrom CL, et al. MR imaging of the trigeminal ganglion, nerve, and the perineural vascular plexus: normal appearance and variants with correlation to cadaver specimens. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(7): 1317–1323.
  42. Wood-Jones F. The Non-metrical Morphological Characters of the Skull as Criteria for Racial Diagnosis: Part I: General Discussion of the Morphological Characters Employed in Racial Diagnosis. J Anat. 1931; 65(Pt 2): 179–195.
  43. Yanagi S. [Developmental studies on the foramen rotundum, foramen ovale and foramen spinosum of the human sphenoid bone]. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1987; 62(3): 485–496.