Vol 76, No 1 (2017)
Original article
Published online: 2016-08-29

open access

Page views 2104
Article views/downloads 1723
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

A new insight into the fabella at knee: the foetal development and evolution

Z. W. Jin, S. Shibata, H. Abe, Y. Jin, X. W. Li, G. Murakami
Pubmed: 27665955
Folia Morphol 2017;76(1):87-93.

Abstract

Using longitudinal semiserial sections of 12 lower extremities from 8 human foetuses at 15–18 weeks, we compared foetal morphologies of the knee in specimens with and without fabellae. We also compared the fabella, if present, with the hallucal sesamoid in the same foetus. Cartilaginous fabella, positive for versican and tenascin by immunohistochemistry, was found in 5 of the 8 foetuses. This structure was embedded in a thick and tight lateral fibrous band, providing a common origin of the plantaris muscle and the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle. The plantaris was covered by the lateral head of the gastrocnemius, but these 2 muscles were separated by a distinct fascia or space. Notably, the foetal fabella did not attach to the joint capsule. In the 3 specimens without fabellae, the lateral fibrous band was thin, containing a fibrous mass, negative for versican and tenascin, in place of the fabella. The “medial” head of the gastrocnemius faced or covered the plantaris, while the lateral head was continuous with the plantaris. A hallucal cartilaginous sesamoid, positive for versican and tenascin, was present in all 8 specimens. It carried a flat surface facing the joint cavity and was covered by tendons of the short muscles of the foot. Because of the difference in topographical relation of muscles between specimens with or without fabella, rather than mechanical stress to the tendon, fabella development may require a distinct plantaris muscle independent of the gastrocnemius. We discussed about an evolutionary aspect of the fabella and plantaris muscle.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Benjamin M, Qin S, Ralphs JR. Fibrocartilage associated with human tendons and their pulleys. J Anat. 1995; 187 ( Pt 3): 625–633.
  2. Benjamin M, Ralphs JR. Fibrocartilage in tendons and ligaments--an adaptation to compressive load. J Anat. 1998; 193 ( Pt 4): 481–494.
  3. Chew CP, Lee KH, Koh JS, et al. Incidence and radiological characteristics of fabellae in an Asian population. Singapore Med J. 2014; 55(4): 198–201.
  4. Eyal S, Blitz E, Shwartz Y, et al. On the development of the patella. Development. 2015; 142(10): 1831–1839.
  5. Frohse F, Fränkel M. Die Muskeln des menschlichen Beines. In: von Bardeleben K (ed). Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1913; pp. 561–564.
  6. Gray DJ, Gardner E. Prenatal development of the human knee and superior tibiofibular joints. Am J Anat. 1950; 86(2): 235–287.
  7. Hayashi S, Kim JH, Hwang SE, et al. Interface between intramembranous and endochondral ossification in human foetuses. Folia Morphol. 2014; 73(2): 199–205.
  8. Kawashima T, Takeishi H, Yoshitomi S, et al. Anatomical study of the fabella, fabellar complex and its clinical implications. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29(8): 611–616.
  9. Mérida-Velasco J, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Espín-Ferra J, et al. Development of the human knee joint. Anat Rec. 1997; 248(2): 269–278, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0185(199706)248:2<269::aid-ar14>3.0.co;2-n.
  10. Milz S, Benjamin M, Putz R. Molecular parameters indicating adaptation to mechanical stress in fibrous connective tissue. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2005; 178: 1–71.
  11. Minowa T, Murakami G, Kura H, et al. Does the fabella contribute to the reinforcement of the posterolateral corner of the knee by inducing the development of associated ligaments? J Orthop Sci. 2004; 9(1): 59–65.
  12. Nakamura T, Suzuki D, Murakami G, et al. Human fetal anatomy of the posterior semimembranosus complex at the knee with special reference to the gastrocnemio-semimembranosus bursa. Knee. 2011; 18(4): 271–277.
  13. Phukubye P, Oyedele O. The incidence and structure of the fabella in a South African cadaver sample. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(1): 84–90.
  14. Pritchett JW. The incidence of fabellae in osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(9): 1379–1380.
  15. Robertson A, Jones SCE, Paes R, et al. The fabella: a forgotten source of knee pain? Knee. 2004; 11(3): 243–245.
  16. Sarin VK, Erickson GM, Giori NJ, et al. Coincident development of sesamoid bones and clues to their evolution. Anat Rec. 1999; 257(5): 174–180, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0185(19991015)257:5<174::aid-ar6>3.0.co;2-o.
  17. Seebacher JR, Inglis AE, Marshall JL, et al. The structure of the posterolateral aspect of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(4): 536–541.
  18. Shibata S, Fukada K, Imai H, et al. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry of versican, aggrecan and link protein, and histochemistry of hyaluronan in the developing mouse limb bud cartilage. J Anat. 2003; 203(4): 425–432.
  19. Theodorou SJ, Theodorou DJ, Resnick D. Painful stress fractures of the fabella in patients with total knee arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(5): 1141–1144.
  20. Uchiyama E, Kim JiH, Abe H, et al. Fetal development of ligaments around the tarsal bones with special reference to contribution of muscles. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(3): 389–398.
  21. Warburton N, Yakovleff M, Malric A. Anatomical adaptations of the hind limb musculature of tree-kangaroos for arboreal locomotion (Marsupialia : Macropodinae). Austr J Zool. 2012; 60(4): 246.
  22. Williams PL. Gray’s Anatomy. 38th ed., Churchill Livingstone, London, 1995.
  23. Yammine K. The sesamoids of the feet in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int. 2015; 90(3): 144–160.
  24. Zeng SX, Dong XL, Dang RS, et al. Anatomic study of fabella and its surrounding structures in a Chinese population. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012; 34(1): 65–71.